When I trained in taekwondo at America's Best Karate in Chandler, Arizona in the late 1990s, one of my instructors was the late Tony Williams. Mr. Williams was a black belt in kajukenbo, was well-known in competition circles, and preferred to go by his nickname, "Satch." Satch taught sparring (though he'd call it "fighting") and our classes invariably included a significant amount of conditioning. Any of my fellow students reading this probably scoffed at my use of the word "significant" as that is probably a significant understatement. Satch could often be heard yelling "THE MIND GIVES UP BEFORE THE BODY DOES!" and "EMPTY YOUR CUP!!" I knew what he meant by the first one, but had to ask him to explain the second. What did "Empty your cup!" mean?
If you've got a cup and you want a drink, you're going to want to fill that cup. But if your cup is already full of something else, then you won't be able to use it. Makes sense. Your brain is the cup and the "something else" is your preconceived notions and/or past experiences that are getting in the way of your learning something new (the drink you want). If you "empty your cup" before training then you're setting aside what you already know (or think you know) and making yourself ready to learn something new. This, of course, doesn't apply just to martial arts training. In any potential learning situation, the less you have in your cup, the more ready you are to learn. Bruce Lee said it best:
It doesn't matter what's in your cup! At the risk of being immodest, I've been trained pretty well so what's in my cup is pretty good. After decades of training in karate and taekwondo, I know how to do certain things. If someone throws a punch at me, there are several ways I might react to protect myself and I'm pretty confident that the one I choose will work with devastating effect. The same is true if someone were to try to grab me and take me down. I don't know much about Brazilian Jiu Jitsu, though, so if I show up to BJJ class and my cup is full of karate and taekwondo, there won't be any room for something new. Sure, I might seem more successful in the short term, but in the future I'll look back on what I've done and realize that I didn't really learn anything...because I'll still be trying to apply my previous training to new situations.
Before each class, I focus on emptying my cup so it's ready to receive something new. So, the next time you're struggling to learn something new, ask yourself, "How full is my cup?" If you find that it's full, then empty it and try again...
Yosemite Samurai
Father, Brother, Son; Martial Artist, Tech Geek, Blogger; Unschooler, Liberal, Environmentalist; MBA, DTM, PMP...
Saturday, February 09, 2013
Friday, June 29, 2012
The Man in the Mirror
How do you see yourself? I don't mean this in a "Do you see yourself as a good person?" kind of way. I mean: When you are practicing your martial art, what are you doing with your eyes? Are you looking at yourself, or are you looking elsewhere?
Most martial arts have some kind of forms or patterns as part of the system. I learned many kata in Isshinryu and Kenpo, and many hyung in Taekwondo. I'm currently learning the basic form in Tai Chi class. During the learning process, it's natural (and necessary) to watch what someone else (usually the instructor) is doing. This is how visual learners learn. (I published a post on learning styles in 2008. You can find it here.) What do you do after you know the pattern?
The obvious answer is: To make sure I'm doing the techniques properly. Yes, but why use the mirror to do this? I shouldn't need a mirror to see myself, right? If I want to know whether my fist is shoulder height, I shouldn't look at the man in the mirror, I should look at my fist. The benefits to doing this are twofold: First, and most obviously, I don't become dependent on the mirror. I've seen many students totally confused trying to do their forms in a different location, or by simply turning them to face in a different direction.
Second, and more importantly, it means I'm more likely to be looking in the "right" direction as required by the form. Forms are supposed to simulate self-defense situations. This means that your eyes should be focused on where your imaginary attacker is, not off in the distance at your own reflection. Think about it: If you're practicing 15 feet from a mirror, and you're looking at yourself in that mirror, then you are focusing on an object that appears to be 30 feet away! This is not conducive to focusing on an attacker who is right in front of you.
If you're looking at the man in the mirror, then I'm asking you to change your ways. I don't think I can make this message any clearer. If you want to make your forms better, then take a look at yourself and make a change! (Apologies to Michael Jackson.) Thanks!
Most martial arts have some kind of forms or patterns as part of the system. I learned many kata in Isshinryu and Kenpo, and many hyung in Taekwondo. I'm currently learning the basic form in Tai Chi class. During the learning process, it's natural (and necessary) to watch what someone else (usually the instructor) is doing. This is how visual learners learn. (I published a post on learning styles in 2008. You can find it here.) What do you do after you know the pattern?
Many martial arts training floors (in my experience) are walled, at least in part, by mirrors. I think this is very helpful to the learning process. I have often found myself unable to see what's going on except in reflection...and sometimes multiple reflections! The problem is that I find myself continuing to use the mirror even after I know the pattern. I'm not looking at the instructor, I'm looking at myself. Why?
Second, and more importantly, it means I'm more likely to be looking in the "right" direction as required by the form. Forms are supposed to simulate self-defense situations. This means that your eyes should be focused on where your imaginary attacker is, not off in the distance at your own reflection. Think about it: If you're practicing 15 feet from a mirror, and you're looking at yourself in that mirror, then you are focusing on an object that appears to be 30 feet away! This is not conducive to focusing on an attacker who is right in front of you.
If you're looking at the man in the mirror, then I'm asking you to change your ways. I don't think I can make this message any clearer. If you want to make your forms better, then take a look at yourself and make a change! (Apologies to Michael Jackson.) Thanks!
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Balance
I had an epiphany in Tai Chi class today. In fact, my class just ended about 15 minutes ago and I went straight to my computer to write. My epiphany was regarding balance. It's no surprise that martial arts training requires one to think about balance. This is true regardless of whether one's style is Tai Chi or Karate, Aikido or Taekwondo. The subject of my epiphany, is not whether balance is important, but rather how that balance is achieved and maintained...
Imagine you want to carry a 10' log. It's not so heavy that you can't lift it, but not so light that you can easily carry it with one hand. What do you do? Having been in this situation many times over the past year, I can confidently answer that the most effective way to carry such a log is to hoist it on your shoulder at its midpoint. Or rather, at its balance point. Once balance is achieved, it's relatively easy to maintain with minor adjustments, as you walk.
Now think of your body and limbs as logs that you want to move. In martial arts, we are often focused on the ends: hands, feet, knees, elbows, and head. This makes sense from the perspective of technique, but it makes balance more difficult to maintain. After my epiphany, I started from a ready position and began to think about moving my "logs" from their balance points. I don't mean simply keeping my center of gravity over some imaginary point between my feet. I mean, as I move my forearm, focusing on moving it from it's balance point.
The difference was immediate and profound. I was no longer thinking about one end of my forearm needing to be somewhere, then considering where the other end needed to be to maintain balance. I simply moved my balanced forearm to where I wanted it to be. The feeling was the same with my legs. I was no longer burdened by having to think about balance as a second-order consideration to movement. I wasn't moving, while trying to maintain balance. Balance was a given. I was balanced AND I was moving.
Give it a try. I hope you have an epiphany, too...
Daniel-san first had to learn balance
Imagine you want to carry a 10' log. It's not so heavy that you can't lift it, but not so light that you can easily carry it with one hand. What do you do? Having been in this situation many times over the past year, I can confidently answer that the most effective way to carry such a log is to hoist it on your shoulder at its midpoint. Or rather, at its balance point. Once balance is achieved, it's relatively easy to maintain with minor adjustments, as you walk.
Now think of your body and limbs as logs that you want to move. In martial arts, we are often focused on the ends: hands, feet, knees, elbows, and head. This makes sense from the perspective of technique, but it makes balance more difficult to maintain. After my epiphany, I started from a ready position and began to think about moving my "logs" from their balance points. I don't mean simply keeping my center of gravity over some imaginary point between my feet. I mean, as I move my forearm, focusing on moving it from it's balance point.
The difference was immediate and profound. I was no longer thinking about one end of my forearm needing to be somewhere, then considering where the other end needed to be to maintain balance. I simply moved my balanced forearm to where I wanted it to be. The feeling was the same with my legs. I was no longer burdened by having to think about balance as a second-order consideration to movement. I wasn't moving, while trying to maintain balance. Balance was a given. I was balanced AND I was moving.
Give it a try. I hope you have an epiphany, too...
Saturday, November 05, 2011
Feel the Pain
This post is about pain, a feeling with which I have become more familiar over the past couple of week. On Sunday, 10/23/11, I hit my fingers with the blade of my mitre saw while attempting to cut a small piece of log. For those of you who don't know what a mitre saw is, I took the picture below of mine right after we got back from the ER. The piece of redwood jammed behind the blade is the piece I was trying to cut. When it slipped, so did my hand...
As you can imagine, such a blade has the potential to wreak havoc on fingers. I felt the sting of 10,000 paper cuts, then almost nothing. I yelled for my wife, then started walking into the house and up the stairs. I don't normally yell, so she was quick to know something was wrong. She met me with some towels and then started getting herself and the kids ready for a trip to the ER. She told me to get into the car right away, in case I passed out. I didn't think that was likely, but I did walk out onto our front deck, which isn't a way to the car...so she might have had a point.
The purpose of this post isn't to give you a play-by-play recap of our trip to the ER, so I'll be brief... X-rays showed no bone damage, and I could still move the joints, so it was just a flesh wound. The PA shot some local anesthetic into my knuckles, let it kick in, then cleaned me out and sewed me up. I left with prescriptions for pain meds and antibiotics, and mummy fingers:
Most people I tell about this can relate to cutting their finger with a knife, perhaps in the kitchen. They say they can't imagine how much more painful it is to be cut with a power saw. What I say next usually surprises: It didn't really hurt that much. Honestly, if the pain of 10,000 paper cuts had been continuous, I'd have been writhing on the ground screaming. Our bodies have an amazing ability to shut out pain following trauma. I suspect the event was more traumatic for Brandi and the kids. This "shock" is so we can function well enough to get care. (Full disclosure: The Lidocaine injections into my knuckles hurt like a son-of-a-bitch.) Shortly after we got home (via Chipotle and CVS), I'd eaten and taken the first of my pain meds, which were described as "double-strength Vicodin;" I was feeling pretty good. (Chipotle always does that for me.)
Sermon time: Pain is our body's way of saying, "Stop that!" or "Don't do that again!" I didn't need to continuously feel the pain to know that it'd be a good idea to avoid touching moving saw blades in the future... Pain meds (IMO) are not intended, and should not be used, for the complete removal of pain. Thanks to the meds, I wasn't in a lot of pain during my first week, but that doesn't mean I felt good. Narcotic pain killers are serious stuff. I was depressed. I was tired. I didn't eat right. Basically, I felt like crap.
I had back surgery in 2001 and was given a narcotic pain med prescription afterwards. I didn't even finish it out of fear that I'd get used to it. I found myself being able to relate to people who get addicted to pain pills since it would have been so easy just to keep taking them... My recent injury simply re-affirmed that relation. I could have had my prescription refilled, but I didn't want to. I wanted to feel the pain. It is (has been) manageable -- occasionally distracting, but not so much so that I truly need narcotic help to reduce it. Because pain is a form of behavior modification, I think it's important to feel it. There are certain things we just don't do (or as often) because it hurts.
The problem with not feeling the pain is that you stop being able to feel anything. We need to feel. Feeling is good. Even painful feelings, as long as they're manageable, are better than none. I've been describing physical pain, but I believe this applies to emotional pain as well. Pain is a learning experience. I believe in natural consequences as a learning tool and it doesn't get more natural than pain!
I have learned that I need to protect myself better when using my saw, and will come up with tools, rules, and strategies to make it so. Perhaps you were (or are) in a relationship with someone who causes you pain, and you need to find a way to protect yourself better, too. Deadening the pain just makes it easier to justify repeating the behaviors that led to it. I say FEEL THE PAIN! Then, learn from it and come up with ways to avoid it, or at least minimize its impact. As Westley said, "Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something." Don't buy it! Feel the pain and live your life!
As you can imagine, such a blade has the potential to wreak havoc on fingers. I felt the sting of 10,000 paper cuts, then almost nothing. I yelled for my wife, then started walking into the house and up the stairs. I don't normally yell, so she was quick to know something was wrong. She met me with some towels and then started getting herself and the kids ready for a trip to the ER. She told me to get into the car right away, in case I passed out. I didn't think that was likely, but I did walk out onto our front deck, which isn't a way to the car...so she might have had a point.
The purpose of this post isn't to give you a play-by-play recap of our trip to the ER, so I'll be brief... X-rays showed no bone damage, and I could still move the joints, so it was just a flesh wound. The PA shot some local anesthetic into my knuckles, let it kick in, then cleaned me out and sewed me up. I left with prescriptions for pain meds and antibiotics, and mummy fingers:
Most people I tell about this can relate to cutting their finger with a knife, perhaps in the kitchen. They say they can't imagine how much more painful it is to be cut with a power saw. What I say next usually surprises: It didn't really hurt that much. Honestly, if the pain of 10,000 paper cuts had been continuous, I'd have been writhing on the ground screaming. Our bodies have an amazing ability to shut out pain following trauma. I suspect the event was more traumatic for Brandi and the kids. This "shock" is so we can function well enough to get care. (Full disclosure: The Lidocaine injections into my knuckles hurt like a son-of-a-bitch.) Shortly after we got home (via Chipotle and CVS), I'd eaten and taken the first of my pain meds, which were described as "double-strength Vicodin;" I was feeling pretty good. (Chipotle always does that for me.)
Sermon time: Pain is our body's way of saying, "Stop that!" or "Don't do that again!" I didn't need to continuously feel the pain to know that it'd be a good idea to avoid touching moving saw blades in the future... Pain meds (IMO) are not intended, and should not be used, for the complete removal of pain. Thanks to the meds, I wasn't in a lot of pain during my first week, but that doesn't mean I felt good. Narcotic pain killers are serious stuff. I was depressed. I was tired. I didn't eat right. Basically, I felt like crap.
I had back surgery in 2001 and was given a narcotic pain med prescription afterwards. I didn't even finish it out of fear that I'd get used to it. I found myself being able to relate to people who get addicted to pain pills since it would have been so easy just to keep taking them... My recent injury simply re-affirmed that relation. I could have had my prescription refilled, but I didn't want to. I wanted to feel the pain. It is (has been) manageable -- occasionally distracting, but not so much so that I truly need narcotic help to reduce it. Because pain is a form of behavior modification, I think it's important to feel it. There are certain things we just don't do (or as often) because it hurts.
The problem with not feeling the pain is that you stop being able to feel anything. We need to feel. Feeling is good. Even painful feelings, as long as they're manageable, are better than none. I've been describing physical pain, but I believe this applies to emotional pain as well. Pain is a learning experience. I believe in natural consequences as a learning tool and it doesn't get more natural than pain!
I have learned that I need to protect myself better when using my saw, and will come up with tools, rules, and strategies to make it so. Perhaps you were (or are) in a relationship with someone who causes you pain, and you need to find a way to protect yourself better, too. Deadening the pain just makes it easier to justify repeating the behaviors that led to it. I say FEEL THE PAIN! Then, learn from it and come up with ways to avoid it, or at least minimize its impact. As Westley said, "Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something." Don't buy it! Feel the pain and live your life!
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Lesson Learned
All parents have been in a position to teach their kids a lesson. What defines us as parents, really, what defines our relationship with our kids, is what lesson we choose to teach them when this opportunity arises... A few weeks ago, one of my carpool mates was telling us about a car accident her son had been in on Highway 17, which we drive to work every day. Highway 17, also called the Santa Cruz Highway, is a mountain road that connects San Jose with Santa Cruz. It is the main route folks like me use to get to work, and the main route valley dwellers take to the beach on the weekends.
Highway 17 is a relatively dangerous drive. It's not Ice Road Truckers dangerous by any stretch, but it does take some getting used to...and when the sign says slow down you'd best be slowing down, especially in the rain. Anyway, the son, who I think is around 20, was driving too fast, in the rain, and spun his car around into the median. Fortunately, or perhaps miraculously, he wasn't hurt and no other cars were involved. The damage to his car wasn't too bad, probably because it is an older car, but it wasn't minor either. I think she said they got an estimate for a couple of thousand bucks. A lot of money, to be sure, but not THAT much...
The discussion in our carpool that ensued, but in which I did not participate, was how much of the cost should the son be required to pay to ensure that he "learned his lesson."
This brought me back to my younger years, which, I'm not too ashamed to admit, were NOT free of vehicular folly. One incident, as I recall, occurred at the intersection of Routes 42 and 69 in the Connecticut River Valley, a heavily wooded area not totally unlike Highway 17. There's a traffic light there now, but there wasn't back then...
Like the son of my carpool mate, I learned a lesson that day: Car accidents are REALLY freakin' scary! They don't happen in slow motion, like in the movies. They're quick, and violent, and you don't have any idea what's going on until it's over. After the car stops moving, your heart is still racing, your hands are shaking, and all you really want to do is close your eyes and cry. It's horrible! If you're lucky, like I was, then that's the worst of it...
I'm sure all parents' first thought is hoping their kid is unhurt, then hoping everyone else involved is okay, too. What a parent does next is what writes the next lesson learned. My parents understood that I was scared, and embarrassed, and no amount of yelling or financial burden was going to make that first lesson any stronger.
The lesson my parents taught me was this: They had my back, no matter what! Most parents will tell you that they'd support their kids through think and thin. Choosing to impose a well-crafted, but still arbitrary, punishment, and calling it a "lesson" wouldn't have taught me anything about safe driving. Now, I'm not saying that there shouldn't be consequences, but that's not the same thing. The fact is that my parents chose to use something horrible as an opportunity to "walk the talk" and that's a lesson I'll never forget...
Highway 17 is a relatively dangerous drive. It's not Ice Road Truckers dangerous by any stretch, but it does take some getting used to...and when the sign says slow down you'd best be slowing down, especially in the rain. Anyway, the son, who I think is around 20, was driving too fast, in the rain, and spun his car around into the median. Fortunately, or perhaps miraculously, he wasn't hurt and no other cars were involved. The damage to his car wasn't too bad, probably because it is an older car, but it wasn't minor either. I think she said they got an estimate for a couple of thousand bucks. A lot of money, to be sure, but not THAT much...
The discussion in our carpool that ensued, but in which I did not participate, was how much of the cost should the son be required to pay to ensure that he "learned his lesson."
This brought me back to my younger years, which, I'm not too ashamed to admit, were NOT free of vehicular folly. One incident, as I recall, occurred at the intersection of Routes 42 and 69 in the Connecticut River Valley, a heavily wooded area not totally unlike Highway 17. There's a traffic light there now, but there wasn't back then...
Like the son of my carpool mate, I learned a lesson that day: Car accidents are REALLY freakin' scary! They don't happen in slow motion, like in the movies. They're quick, and violent, and you don't have any idea what's going on until it's over. After the car stops moving, your heart is still racing, your hands are shaking, and all you really want to do is close your eyes and cry. It's horrible! If you're lucky, like I was, then that's the worst of it...
I'm sure all parents' first thought is hoping their kid is unhurt, then hoping everyone else involved is okay, too. What a parent does next is what writes the next lesson learned. My parents understood that I was scared, and embarrassed, and no amount of yelling or financial burden was going to make that first lesson any stronger.
The lesson my parents taught me was this: They had my back, no matter what! Most parents will tell you that they'd support their kids through think and thin. Choosing to impose a well-crafted, but still arbitrary, punishment, and calling it a "lesson" wouldn't have taught me anything about safe driving. Now, I'm not saying that there shouldn't be consequences, but that's not the same thing. The fact is that my parents chose to use something horrible as an opportunity to "walk the talk" and that's a lesson I'll never forget...
Saturday, June 11, 2011
An Open Letter to Canucks Fans (and maybe some Mavs fans, too)
Congratulations! Your team is on the verge of its first Stanley Cup in the franchise's over 40 years! You're really excited, but also pretty nervous. I know how you feel. You see, I'm a Boston Red Sox fan. I've been there. I know how you feel. I was lying on my living room floor, watching the 1986 World Series, and wondering how high I'd be able to jump when they made the final out. Would I hit the ceiling? Would it hurt? Would I care? Of course, thanks to Bill Buckner's error in game 6 and the Mets' comeback in game 7, I never got the find out...
Of course, they finally broke through in 2004. Coming back from 0-3 against the Yankees in the ALCS only made the victory that much sweeter!! I listened to the end of game 4 of that World Series (the Sox won the first three games) over St. Louis on the radio in the parking lot of the Tempe Public Library. I yelled and screamed when the game was over, and drove home listening to the post-game show.
I spent much of the next week or so reading articles and watching highlights. I particularly enjoyed watching highlights of game 3 of the ALCS. The Red Sox sucked that game and Yankees won big. It sure was nice being able to look back at that as an irrelevant game in the story of the season. Who was the losing pitcher for Boston? Did anyone make any errors? Who cares?!?!! They won the series and that's all that matters...
When the 2005 season started, I realized that what I had been telling my older brother all these years was true. That was last year, it's history; stop living in the past! You see, my brother, father, and uncles are Yankees fans. (I have four uncles and can only speak for the two who lived closest to us.) I can't say for sure why I became a Red Sox fan, though I heard it had something to do with my brother and I not trying to collect the same baseball cards. Seems like a stupid reason to root for a team. Just as stupid is living near the team's home stadium, or being from that area...
A friend of mine once said that rooting for sport teams these days is nothing more than rooting for laundry. The players are rarely "local boy made good" types because the best players go where the money is. A team wins or loses based primarily on the owners' willingness to invest in a winner...and star players' belief that the franchise wants to win. I didn't really think about sports in this way until after the Sox won again in 2007. It just wasn't that big of a deal. In fact, because they were so heavily favored, it was more of a relief that they didn't blow it than a joy that they won it all. (This may explain why Yankees fans are generally such jerks. No real joy when they win, just crap from the rest of the world when they lose.)
It was at this point that I started wondering how my life would have been different had I been raised a Yankees fan. Now, this may be traitorous coming from a citizen of Red Sox Nation, but it was a legitimate question for me since I was surrounded by Yankees fans at home. The truth is that my life (as a sports fan anyway) would have been much better if I'd been rooting for the Yankees. All those games in the Bronx or Fenway I went to with my family could have been real bonding experiences! I never had that. My father and I never talked about baseball, because the team he wanted to talk about was a team I hated!
My brother and father went to the 2001 World Series games in Arizona. I didn't want to go. My excuse (and it's a good one) was that my wife was over eight months pregnant, but the real reason was that I didn't want the conflict that would come from being with Yankees fans and rooting for the Diamondbacks. If the Yankees won, I'd hate them for being happy. If the Yankees lost, I'd have to stifle my joy. (My brother bought my unborn son a baseball bat at game 6. I am sure that he expected to be able to say that he bought that the night he saw the Yankees win the World Series in person. Alas, the Yankees were epically crushed in game 6!)
You see! I still take some degree of pleasure in thinking about a game that happened almost 10 years ago...I also read with glee news of Joba Chamberlain's season-ending surgery. It's sad... It's too late to switch now, but I know I'd be much better off had I been a Yankees fan from the start. I'd probably have been at those World Series games and would have had a great bonding experience with my brother and father. Also, my daughter was born the night the 2003 ALCS ended, which would have been a great family story. Who know? Maybe we would have named her Mariana...
The point I'm trying to make is that it's not whether "your team" wins or loses that matters. What matters is who you get to share the experience with and how it strengthens your relationships. I happen to know that some Cubs fans are pretty happy, well-adjusted people...but you could never guess that based on the Cubs' post-season record. I'm sure the same is true of Detroit Lions fans...assuming there actually are some. I hope the Canucks win, I really do. (Boston fans will be okay. Between the Red Sox, the Patriots, the Celtics, and the Bruins, they've had plenty of practice at both winning and losing.)Bringing Lord Stanley's Cup to Vancouver would be historic! Seeing the victory parade will give you another shining moment to share with loved ones...and then it'll be all over and you'll look around and see what really matters...
In the meantime...get it done!
Of course, they finally broke through in 2004. Coming back from 0-3 against the Yankees in the ALCS only made the victory that much sweeter!! I listened to the end of game 4 of that World Series (the Sox won the first three games) over St. Louis on the radio in the parking lot of the Tempe Public Library. I yelled and screamed when the game was over, and drove home listening to the post-game show.
I spent much of the next week or so reading articles and watching highlights. I particularly enjoyed watching highlights of game 3 of the ALCS. The Red Sox sucked that game and Yankees won big. It sure was nice being able to look back at that as an irrelevant game in the story of the season. Who was the losing pitcher for Boston? Did anyone make any errors? Who cares?!?!! They won the series and that's all that matters...
When the 2005 season started, I realized that what I had been telling my older brother all these years was true. That was last year, it's history; stop living in the past! You see, my brother, father, and uncles are Yankees fans. (I have four uncles and can only speak for the two who lived closest to us.) I can't say for sure why I became a Red Sox fan, though I heard it had something to do with my brother and I not trying to collect the same baseball cards. Seems like a stupid reason to root for a team. Just as stupid is living near the team's home stadium, or being from that area...
A friend of mine once said that rooting for sport teams these days is nothing more than rooting for laundry. The players are rarely "local boy made good" types because the best players go where the money is. A team wins or loses based primarily on the owners' willingness to invest in a winner...and star players' belief that the franchise wants to win. I didn't really think about sports in this way until after the Sox won again in 2007. It just wasn't that big of a deal. In fact, because they were so heavily favored, it was more of a relief that they didn't blow it than a joy that they won it all. (This may explain why Yankees fans are generally such jerks. No real joy when they win, just crap from the rest of the world when they lose.)
It was at this point that I started wondering how my life would have been different had I been raised a Yankees fan. Now, this may be traitorous coming from a citizen of Red Sox Nation, but it was a legitimate question for me since I was surrounded by Yankees fans at home. The truth is that my life (as a sports fan anyway) would have been much better if I'd been rooting for the Yankees. All those games in the Bronx or Fenway I went to with my family could have been real bonding experiences! I never had that. My father and I never talked about baseball, because the team he wanted to talk about was a team I hated!
My brother and father went to the 2001 World Series games in Arizona. I didn't want to go. My excuse (and it's a good one) was that my wife was over eight months pregnant, but the real reason was that I didn't want the conflict that would come from being with Yankees fans and rooting for the Diamondbacks. If the Yankees won, I'd hate them for being happy. If the Yankees lost, I'd have to stifle my joy. (My brother bought my unborn son a baseball bat at game 6. I am sure that he expected to be able to say that he bought that the night he saw the Yankees win the World Series in person. Alas, the Yankees were epically crushed in game 6!)
You see! I still take some degree of pleasure in thinking about a game that happened almost 10 years ago...I also read with glee news of Joba Chamberlain's season-ending surgery. It's sad... It's too late to switch now, but I know I'd be much better off had I been a Yankees fan from the start. I'd probably have been at those World Series games and would have had a great bonding experience with my brother and father. Also, my daughter was born the night the 2003 ALCS ended, which would have been a great family story. Who know? Maybe we would have named her Mariana...
The point I'm trying to make is that it's not whether "your team" wins or loses that matters. What matters is who you get to share the experience with and how it strengthens your relationships. I happen to know that some Cubs fans are pretty happy, well-adjusted people...but you could never guess that based on the Cubs' post-season record. I'm sure the same is true of Detroit Lions fans...assuming there actually are some. I hope the Canucks win, I really do. (Boston fans will be okay. Between the Red Sox, the Patriots, the Celtics, and the Bruins, they've had plenty of practice at both winning and losing.)Bringing Lord Stanley's Cup to Vancouver would be historic! Seeing the victory parade will give you another shining moment to share with loved ones...and then it'll be all over and you'll look around and see what really matters...
In the meantime...get it done!
Friday, April 22, 2011
Old As You Feel
When I tell people I'm a martial artist, one of the responses I often get is "I'd love to do that, but I'm too old to start..." Nonsense. You're never too old to begin, though you may have to choose a different style if you're starting at age 60 versus age 16. A few years ago, I published a post on how to choose a martial arts school. You can find it in my blog's archive. This post is similar, but more about how my training has changed over the years...and how I've had to adjust as I've gotten older.
I started my martial arts training in 1991, when I was 18-years old. As an adult (technically speaking), I didn't have the flexibility that the kids had, but I trained hard. I was, after all, still a teenager and karate was my outlet from school. (I was a freshman at RIT when I started training in Isshinryu Karate.) There were days when I was pretty sore following a tough workout...and it felt great!
Fast-forward to 2000... I am training in TKD and still pushing myself pretty hard. The result was a herniated disk injury that changed my life. I blogged about that here. The bottom line is that I had to make a lot of adjustments to my training since I couldn't push myself as hard physically because it would mean a lot of down time afterwards...
Fast-forward again to 2011... I'm not training as much as I'd like, but it's mostly due to competing priorities following a move (new home, new job, new life). I haven't given up on Okinawan Kenpo Karate Kobudo (OKKK), but started taking Tai Chi classes at work. None of my other style switches (Isshinryu to TKD to OKKK) were really *that* different. Tai Chi is...different. I love it! (I haven't trained long enough to want to blog about those differences, so stay tuned!)
I'm not sure I would have loved it at 18, though. At 38, I have a lot more respect for my body. I can't think of any other way to describe it. When I was 18, I was (like all teenagers) invincible. The bumps and bruises I got from training were like badges of honor. Now, I'm much more honored to have gotten through class, learned something, and be able to function the following day.
I'm not suggesting that anyone who is training in a hard style (like TKD or OKKK) quit and take up Tai Chi. The key is to know your body and train in a way that is consistent with your long-term goals. I have a friend who is in his 40's, but still trains like he's 22. (If you're reading this, you know who you are!) He's almost always beat up. If something's not hurting, then he trains until something is. That, in my opinion, is no way to train. Our training should have a positive effect on our health and well-being!
This is true whether you're 18, 28, 38, 48, or more! Know your limits! But, be true to yourself at the same time. Don't use "I know my limits" as an excuse to take it easy all the time. I've been guilty of that, so I'm not just pointing fingers. It was really easy for me to say that my back was hurting when I just didn't feel like pushing myself. Sometimes it was true, but sometimes it was just an excuse. Knowing your limits will not only allow you to avoid injuring yourself, but will also allow you to push yourself appropriately.
You're only as old as you feel! The goal of martial arts training, in my opinion, is to get your "feel" age to advance more slowly than real time...
I started my martial arts training in 1991, when I was 18-years old. As an adult (technically speaking), I didn't have the flexibility that the kids had, but I trained hard. I was, after all, still a teenager and karate was my outlet from school. (I was a freshman at RIT when I started training in Isshinryu Karate.) There were days when I was pretty sore following a tough workout...and it felt great!
Fast-forward to 2000... I am training in TKD and still pushing myself pretty hard. The result was a herniated disk injury that changed my life. I blogged about that here. The bottom line is that I had to make a lot of adjustments to my training since I couldn't push myself as hard physically because it would mean a lot of down time afterwards...
Fast-forward again to 2011... I'm not training as much as I'd like, but it's mostly due to competing priorities following a move (new home, new job, new life). I haven't given up on Okinawan Kenpo Karate Kobudo (OKKK), but started taking Tai Chi classes at work. None of my other style switches (Isshinryu to TKD to OKKK) were really *that* different. Tai Chi is...different. I love it! (I haven't trained long enough to want to blog about those differences, so stay tuned!)
I'm not sure I would have loved it at 18, though. At 38, I have a lot more respect for my body. I can't think of any other way to describe it. When I was 18, I was (like all teenagers) invincible. The bumps and bruises I got from training were like badges of honor. Now, I'm much more honored to have gotten through class, learned something, and be able to function the following day.
I'm not suggesting that anyone who is training in a hard style (like TKD or OKKK) quit and take up Tai Chi. The key is to know your body and train in a way that is consistent with your long-term goals. I have a friend who is in his 40's, but still trains like he's 22. (If you're reading this, you know who you are!) He's almost always beat up. If something's not hurting, then he trains until something is. That, in my opinion, is no way to train. Our training should have a positive effect on our health and well-being!
This is true whether you're 18, 28, 38, 48, or more! Know your limits! But, be true to yourself at the same time. Don't use "I know my limits" as an excuse to take it easy all the time. I've been guilty of that, so I'm not just pointing fingers. It was really easy for me to say that my back was hurting when I just didn't feel like pushing myself. Sometimes it was true, but sometimes it was just an excuse. Knowing your limits will not only allow you to avoid injuring yourself, but will also allow you to push yourself appropriately.
You're only as old as you feel! The goal of martial arts training, in my opinion, is to get your "feel" age to advance more slowly than real time...
Saturday, January 01, 2011
No More Excuses
For most of the past few years and certainly throughout early 2010, I had what I felt were great excuses why I didn't...fill-in-the-blank. I was busy with school. I didn't like my job. I wanted to move. Now that I've graduated, changed jobs to one I really enjoy, and have moved to California...I have no more excuses. At the risk of this post being another New Year's Resolutions post, I'd like to publicly explain two things that I want to do differently in 2011. Of course, I want to exercise more and eat better. Most people do, so I'm not going to bother giving those resolutions any explanation... Here's my top two:
I, Matt Jones, hereby resolve to spend more time playing video games. This morning and last night, I was at the Loucks' place and watched Pucky play on the Xbox 360. He played Black Ops, a trial version of a creepy little game called Limbo, and an obstacle course game that's a lot harder than it looks. Sometimes we all (including the kids) were watching him, sometimes we weren't. It didn't seem to matter to Pucky. He really seemed to be enjoying himself and I couldn't think of a good reason why I shouldn't enjoy playing video games, too. My family sure doesm and we have the systems to prove it: Two Nintendo Wiis, two Xbox 360s, a PS3, and a PS2...not to mention the PCs, laptops, and handheld devices... Why don't I use them? I don't know, but as of today I'm going start. I loved playing video games as a kid and there's no reason I shouldn't play them as an adult. No more excuses...
I, Matt Jones, hereby resolve to put relationships first. Here's what I mean: I have a tendency to put a lot of emphasis on "getting things done." (This may also be why I don't spend enough time playing video games.) There will ALWAYS be stuff to do. Not just chores, but also projects around the house...some necessary, some created by my own ambitions. Putting relationships first means never making anyone, especially my family, feel they're less important than the stuff to do. I can't completely ignore the stuff to do, but I don't have to put it first. As Sandra Dodd has said, you don't HAVE to do the dishes. They'll wait. You can also use paper plates, or (the greener option) have every eat right out of the pan... My best days aren't when I get the most done, so why do I look to have more of those days? My best days are when I strenghthen my relationships, so those are the days I'm going to have more often. No more excuses...
I'm sure I'll post more about this, but will try not to do it in the form of lame "resolution updates" like I did in 2009. Just look for evidence that I'm making progress. In the meantime, look for me on Xbox Live. My gamertag is RedwoodRocker...
I, Matt Jones, hereby resolve to spend more time playing video games. This morning and last night, I was at the Loucks' place and watched Pucky play on the Xbox 360. He played Black Ops, a trial version of a creepy little game called Limbo, and an obstacle course game that's a lot harder than it looks. Sometimes we all (including the kids) were watching him, sometimes we weren't. It didn't seem to matter to Pucky. He really seemed to be enjoying himself and I couldn't think of a good reason why I shouldn't enjoy playing video games, too. My family sure doesm and we have the systems to prove it: Two Nintendo Wiis, two Xbox 360s, a PS3, and a PS2...not to mention the PCs, laptops, and handheld devices... Why don't I use them? I don't know, but as of today I'm going start. I loved playing video games as a kid and there's no reason I shouldn't play them as an adult. No more excuses...
I, Matt Jones, hereby resolve to put relationships first. Here's what I mean: I have a tendency to put a lot of emphasis on "getting things done." (This may also be why I don't spend enough time playing video games.) There will ALWAYS be stuff to do. Not just chores, but also projects around the house...some necessary, some created by my own ambitions. Putting relationships first means never making anyone, especially my family, feel they're less important than the stuff to do. I can't completely ignore the stuff to do, but I don't have to put it first. As Sandra Dodd has said, you don't HAVE to do the dishes. They'll wait. You can also use paper plates, or (the greener option) have every eat right out of the pan... My best days aren't when I get the most done, so why do I look to have more of those days? My best days are when I strenghthen my relationships, so those are the days I'm going to have more often. No more excuses...
I'm sure I'll post more about this, but will try not to do it in the form of lame "resolution updates" like I did in 2009. Just look for evidence that I'm making progress. In the meantime, look for me on Xbox Live. My gamertag is RedwoodRocker...
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Addiction for the Next Generation
I wrote this 10 years ago, but it's just as interesting today, I think...
Back in the 1950’s a lot of people smoked, and many of them did not understand the risks. There are a lot of lawsuits currently going on that claim the cigarette industry knew the risks and ignored them to make a buck. The main issue of these lawsuits is that the industry not only ignored the risks and aided in keeping the public ignorant of these risks, but also took steps to increase the addictive nature of cigarettes. Furthermore, it is said that they targeted children to insure that they’ll have another generation of smokers to keep the profits coming after the current generation dies off.
It seems to me that the key issue in these lawsuits is not whether cigarettes are unhealthy, because I can’t imagine somebody could think otherwise of burning something and sucking the smoke into their lungs…but since we live in a society that used to attach leaches to sick people to “bleed out” the illness then I guess I’ll have to let that one go. The issue seems to be whether the tobacco industry knew about these extent of the health risks, which range from cancer in the smoker to chronic asthma in the children of smokers, and hid this information from the public. Beyond that, however, is the question of whether cigarette makers also made their product more addictive by inflating the level of nicotine, the addictive drug in cigarettes. Forget about tobacco being a “tumor-causing, teeth-staining, smelling, puking, habit;” it’s an addiction, plain and simple. I have a habit of running my fingers through my hair when I’m thinking, but I’ve never said, “I’ve got to go outside in the freezing-cold because I need to run my fingers through my hair.”
The result of much of the so-called “tobacco legislation” is that tobacco companies now have to put larger warning labels on their products. They have to take steps to discourage underage smoking…sort of like having a “marketing” and an “anti-marketing” department. (How would you like to work in an industry that MUST take steps to discourage people from buying your product?) They’re also making billion-dollar donations to states in order to subsidize health-care costs for tobacco-related illness.
Back in the 50’s many people smoked because it was considered “cool.” How cool James Dean would have been as a 70-year-old cancer patient instead of a Rebel Without a Cause is something we’ll never know. Nevertheless, cigarettes were portrayed as something “cool” people had and if you weren’t smoking you were “square.” These days fewer cool people smoke because the health risks are clear, but there’s one thing they do have and that’s CELL PHONES!! Cell phones are not at all like cigarettes, right? They pose no health risks, right? Cellular phone companies don’t target children, right? Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
Many families have microwave ovens in their homes. Microwaves are used to cook food and the ovens provide excellent protection from the harmful radiation with all sorts of seals and automatic-shut-off mechanisms; but what about cellular phones? These phones also produce microwaves and the most common way to use them is to put one against your head. Most people wouldn’t dream of putting their head in a microwave oven, then again most people wouldn’t dream of wrapping their lips around the exhaust pipe of a running automobile, but inhaling the carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke amounts to a similar analogy.
In recent studies, mice exposed to microwaves mimicking the effect of cellular phones have had significant memory loss to the tune of forgetting how to swim; so if follows that putting a microwave-emitting device against one’s head is not particularly wise, but hey, as long as it’s “cool” right? What the heck…if the cool people of the 50’s could ignore the possibility of lung cancer why can’t the cool people of the 90’s ignore the possibility of brain cancer?
This danger seems to be greater with children because studies show that the penetration of radiation from the antenna goes deeper into a child’s brain because their heads and brains are smaller, but also because the conductivity properties of those tissues that are still developing differ, and it facilitates more of an exposure. Regardless, the cell-phone industry appears to be targeting young people with phone models bearing the likeness of various Disney characters and communications providers are encouraging people to switch to cellular-only calling plans. In the words of CNN anchor, Wolf Blitzer, “What the cellular-phone industry is now doing is what the tobacco industry did with its Joe Camel ads.”
Without much research savvy, you can find conflicting evidence about whether cellular phones pose health risks, much in the same way you can find conflicting evidence about tobacco. The similarities do not end there, though. Much of the research conducted that concluded that cigarettes do not pose a health risk, was (surprise!) funded by the tobacco industry. So when I read a quote stating, “We believe that wireless phones are safe, including use by children.” I’m not surprised to also read that it was a spokesman for AT&T Wireless that made it.
Do the companies who manufacture and sell cellular phones and calling plans know that microwave radiation is harmful? Sure. Do they sell them anyway in hopes that they’ll make a buck? You bet. So now that we’ve got the addiction for the next generation underway, we can look forward to the lawsuits continuing…but next time the defendants won’t be Philip Morris and R. J. Reynolds, they’ll be Motorola, Nokia, and Ericsson.
Back in the 1950’s a lot of people smoked, and many of them did not understand the risks. There are a lot of lawsuits currently going on that claim the cigarette industry knew the risks and ignored them to make a buck. The main issue of these lawsuits is that the industry not only ignored the risks and aided in keeping the public ignorant of these risks, but also took steps to increase the addictive nature of cigarettes. Furthermore, it is said that they targeted children to insure that they’ll have another generation of smokers to keep the profits coming after the current generation dies off.
It seems to me that the key issue in these lawsuits is not whether cigarettes are unhealthy, because I can’t imagine somebody could think otherwise of burning something and sucking the smoke into their lungs…but since we live in a society that used to attach leaches to sick people to “bleed out” the illness then I guess I’ll have to let that one go. The issue seems to be whether the tobacco industry knew about these extent of the health risks, which range from cancer in the smoker to chronic asthma in the children of smokers, and hid this information from the public. Beyond that, however, is the question of whether cigarette makers also made their product more addictive by inflating the level of nicotine, the addictive drug in cigarettes. Forget about tobacco being a “tumor-causing, teeth-staining, smelling, puking, habit;” it’s an addiction, plain and simple. I have a habit of running my fingers through my hair when I’m thinking, but I’ve never said, “I’ve got to go outside in the freezing-cold because I need to run my fingers through my hair.”
The result of much of the so-called “tobacco legislation” is that tobacco companies now have to put larger warning labels on their products. They have to take steps to discourage underage smoking…sort of like having a “marketing” and an “anti-marketing” department. (How would you like to work in an industry that MUST take steps to discourage people from buying your product?) They’re also making billion-dollar donations to states in order to subsidize health-care costs for tobacco-related illness.
Back in the 50’s many people smoked because it was considered “cool.” How cool James Dean would have been as a 70-year-old cancer patient instead of a Rebel Without a Cause is something we’ll never know. Nevertheless, cigarettes were portrayed as something “cool” people had and if you weren’t smoking you were “square.” These days fewer cool people smoke because the health risks are clear, but there’s one thing they do have and that’s CELL PHONES!! Cell phones are not at all like cigarettes, right? They pose no health risks, right? Cellular phone companies don’t target children, right? Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
Many families have microwave ovens in their homes. Microwaves are used to cook food and the ovens provide excellent protection from the harmful radiation with all sorts of seals and automatic-shut-off mechanisms; but what about cellular phones? These phones also produce microwaves and the most common way to use them is to put one against your head. Most people wouldn’t dream of putting their head in a microwave oven, then again most people wouldn’t dream of wrapping their lips around the exhaust pipe of a running automobile, but inhaling the carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke amounts to a similar analogy.
In recent studies, mice exposed to microwaves mimicking the effect of cellular phones have had significant memory loss to the tune of forgetting how to swim; so if follows that putting a microwave-emitting device against one’s head is not particularly wise, but hey, as long as it’s “cool” right? What the heck…if the cool people of the 50’s could ignore the possibility of lung cancer why can’t the cool people of the 90’s ignore the possibility of brain cancer?
This danger seems to be greater with children because studies show that the penetration of radiation from the antenna goes deeper into a child’s brain because their heads and brains are smaller, but also because the conductivity properties of those tissues that are still developing differ, and it facilitates more of an exposure. Regardless, the cell-phone industry appears to be targeting young people with phone models bearing the likeness of various Disney characters and communications providers are encouraging people to switch to cellular-only calling plans. In the words of CNN anchor, Wolf Blitzer, “What the cellular-phone industry is now doing is what the tobacco industry did with its Joe Camel ads.”
Without much research savvy, you can find conflicting evidence about whether cellular phones pose health risks, much in the same way you can find conflicting evidence about tobacco. The similarities do not end there, though. Much of the research conducted that concluded that cigarettes do not pose a health risk, was (surprise!) funded by the tobacco industry. So when I read a quote stating, “We believe that wireless phones are safe, including use by children.” I’m not surprised to also read that it was a spokesman for AT&T Wireless that made it.
Do the companies who manufacture and sell cellular phones and calling plans know that microwave radiation is harmful? Sure. Do they sell them anyway in hopes that they’ll make a buck? You bet. So now that we’ve got the addiction for the next generation underway, we can look forward to the lawsuits continuing…but next time the defendants won’t be Philip Morris and R. J. Reynolds, they’ll be Motorola, Nokia, and Ericsson.
Shugyo: A Ritual of Training
In Forrest Morgan’s 1992 book, Living the Martial Way, he defines shugyo as “austere training”. Shugyo is a “ritual observed in some way, shape, or form by every warrior society in the world. It involved hardening the spirit through severe training or some extreme physical test. The ritual takes different forms in different cultures, but they all have a common element: the warrior drives himself, or is driven, to a level of endurance beyond what he previously believed possible. The experience is both grueling and frightening, but the warrior emerges from the ordeal feeling purified. One who has experienced this kind of training is never quite the same afterwards” (Morgan, pg. 59).
Why Shugyo?
For the samuari, shugyo was a way for warriors to build discipline during a time when their very survival depended on the preparedness for battle. So why would people today need to participate in a ritual that is meant to prepare them for a situation that they are not likely to encounter? Psychiatrist and jujutsu stylist, Dr. Alan Hasegawa, explained it best when he wrote: “In an affluent society, it is necessary to purposely seek out the challenges which were once a part of daily life of the warrior. This drive to test the limits of one’s own potential is universal (1987).”
Mr. Morgan recounts a story of shugyo from his days as a nineteen-year old taekwondo student; the story involved intense training during his first martial arts seminar. “Shugyo doesn’t have to take place in the training hall, and if your spirit is strong, you don’t need someone else to drive you on. If fact, undergoing shugyo along, with no one else to motivate you or look after you safety, can temper your spirit like nothing else can. And there’s no warrior ritual more traditional than solitary shugyo” (Morgan, pg. 60). On the seventh of November, nineteen-hundred, ninety-eight, I engaged in the ritual of solitary shugyo; and this paper is a recount of my actions, thoughts, and feelings while climbing the north of the four peaks, east-northeast of Phoenix, Arizona.
Background
Four Peaks, as the group is called, is a part of the Mazatzal Mountains within Tonto National Forest. The peaks are approximately 80 miles east-northeast of Phoenix and the tallest of which is 7,657 feet above sea level. About 800 feet below the north peak is an area known as “the saddle”. It is approximately one thousand feet above the parking area, which is 18 miles of unpaved road away from Arizona State Highway 87. The image above shows the north peak on the left, and “the saddle” below that to the left.
Preparations
Of course, I had been preparing for this ritual throughout my seven-plus years as a martial artist; but for the hike itself, my preparations began the evening before. Knowing that there would be no honor in getting hurt due to lack of preparation, I took this task very seriously. I went to a local supermarket and purchased several liters of water, some Clif bars, and a Met-Rx bar for sustenance. I did not want to be weighted down by heavy food, either in my stomach or on my back, so the bars were an obvious choice. I also purchased batteries for my camera, knowing that I would want to take pictures along my journey.
After returning home from the store, I placed the water in the refrigerator and searched for other items that would be needed: boots, extra socks, gloves, cellular phone, flashlight, my Leatherman multi-tool, and, of course, the camera. With everything laid out and ready to go, I set my alarm clock for 5:40 and went to bed early; sleep was the one thing I was sure I couldn’t buy at the convenience store by the highway before the Four Peaks Road turnoff.
The following morning my wife made me oatmeal and wheat toast for breakfast while I showered, got dressed, finished packing my bag, and loaded up my cooler with water and Gatorade. By seven in the morning, I was on my way.
Half the Fun
They say that getting there is half the fun and for the most part, I disagree; but in this case, the drive was nice. I had the top off of my 1997 Jeep Wrangler and sixty miles per hour makes for some cold wind in the morning, even in Arizona. I must have been a sight to see along the Superstition Freeway, all bundled up in a sweatshirt and gloves, singing along with “Jesus Christ Superstar”. I actually missed my exit for the Beeline Highway and had to double-back, as it turned out, it wouldn’t be the last time I had to turn around that day…
By nine o’clock or so, I had already filled-up my tank with gasoline and was getting ready to start the eighteen-mile climb up Four Peaks Road. I expected the climb to take about an hour and since the going is slow, it always seems to take longer. The road practically requires four-wheel drive, but I didn’t use mine. The biggest problem one faces on that road are the washes (deep trenches formed by water coming down the mountain) and the rocks, so vehicular clearance is the key. I tend to drive fast and love that kind of driving; an average of eighteen miles per hour on that road is a pretty good clip. I reached the parking lot at the trailhead at around ten o’clock, ready to go… My original plan was to ride my mountain bike up to the saddle and hike the rest of the way, but the parks service bans bikes from the trails, so my plan had to be adjusted. Flexibility is the key here, as in life, plans do not always end up being reality and the ability to adjust is the ability to succeed.
Back in the Saddle
The quest for the summit can be broken down into two distinct parts: from the trailhead to the saddle, and from the saddle to the peak. I’d been to the saddle three times previous and to the peak twice, but this will be the first time on my own. The trail to the saddle is pretty easy and it’s my feeling that anyone in reasonable shape can get to the saddle, the key is to avoid stepping on any critters that you encounter along the way.
I reached the saddle by eleven o’clock and took my first break there. I ate one of the Clif bars and downed some Gatorade, then took the time to take a picture of what lay ahead. The crevasse that starts from just to the right of the top and cuts down into the dark is what was in store for me if I wanted to reach the peak. At this point, I thought I’d spend some more time sitting and drinking Gatorade. I figured that if I could reach the saddle on the way down by two in the afternoon, I would make it off of Four Peaks Road by dark.
Into Thin Air
The toughest part about the climb to the peak is the fact that you can never be one-hundred percent sure that the rock you grab to pull yourself up isn’t going to tumble down the mountain with you. A close second to that is the complete lack of direct sunlight and wind-chill factor that brings the temperature of the already-thin air near freezing. Those factors aside, the climb is nothing more than doing about forty pull-ups and a hundred or so “mountain climbers”, which I learned are appropriately named.
My original intent was to hike to the second peak and I thought I could get there by taking a turn off of the trail to the first peak and hiking a quick “down and up”. As it turned out, I was wrong. I spent about forty minutes struggling through some pretty thick brush and pulling cactus needles out of my hands (and rear) before I reached a drop-off that was too high to take safely, along and without ropes. Since discretion is the better part of valor, I chose turn around go for the north peak; getting injured would defeat the purpose of this ritual and only go to show that I lack the judgement necessary to be an effective leader. This is as close as I got to the second peak, which will have to wait for another day.
On Top of the World
It didn’t take me long to reach the north peak after abandoning my quest for the second peak, perhaps another ten minutes. Once on the north peak, I could see Apache and Roosevelt Lakes to the north, as well as back down to the saddle. I took the time to sit for a while, enjoy another Clif bar and some more Gatorade, and of course, take some pictures. The air on the peak is very clear, but the haze that has settled over the city of Phoenix makes it invisible, almost as if the rest of the world had vanished.
Conclusion
The trip back down the mountain was uneventful and I spent a lot of time thinking, as I did during the trip up. I thought about why I chose to undergo the ritual of shugyo and what it would mean to me. I have never thought of myself as someone with “something to prove”, so that was not my motivation. I think it had something to do with just being on my own again, in a manner of speaking. I chose to go when I did for several reasons; the first of which is because it was roughly one year since I first reached the peak. The second reason is because “the idea is to find a memorable occasion that will have emotional significance to those taking part. Then the shugyo serves as a cleansing, a right of passage.” (Morgan, pg. 60) Three weeks before was my wedding day and I can’t think of a more memorable occasion than that.
Perhaps the ritual helped to prepare me for married life, by giving me the confidence I know I’ll need to be a good husband, and someday a good father. Or perhaps the shugyo just served as a chapter marker in my life; the first page of the first chapter of my life together with Brandi. I don’t know. During the trip, I thought about a lot of things and planned on recounting them here, but in retrospect I do not think that was the point of my shugyo. The point was just in the thinking.
I learned about myself that day, spending time alone will do that. I realized that there are some things I like, and others that I don’t. I may not have reached all of my goals during that day, but I think that my understanding about why I am the way I am has improved considerably. And I believe that if I am to understand anyone or anything, I must first understand myself.
References
- Morgan, Forrest E. “Living the Martial Way: A Manual for the Way a Modern Warrior Should Think.” Barricade Books: New York, 1992, pp. 56-61.
- Photos from this day can be found here.
Why Shugyo?
For the samuari, shugyo was a way for warriors to build discipline during a time when their very survival depended on the preparedness for battle. So why would people today need to participate in a ritual that is meant to prepare them for a situation that they are not likely to encounter? Psychiatrist and jujutsu stylist, Dr. Alan Hasegawa, explained it best when he wrote: “In an affluent society, it is necessary to purposely seek out the challenges which were once a part of daily life of the warrior. This drive to test the limits of one’s own potential is universal (1987).”
Mr. Morgan recounts a story of shugyo from his days as a nineteen-year old taekwondo student; the story involved intense training during his first martial arts seminar. “Shugyo doesn’t have to take place in the training hall, and if your spirit is strong, you don’t need someone else to drive you on. If fact, undergoing shugyo along, with no one else to motivate you or look after you safety, can temper your spirit like nothing else can. And there’s no warrior ritual more traditional than solitary shugyo” (Morgan, pg. 60). On the seventh of November, nineteen-hundred, ninety-eight, I engaged in the ritual of solitary shugyo; and this paper is a recount of my actions, thoughts, and feelings while climbing the north of the four peaks, east-northeast of Phoenix, Arizona.
Background
Four Peaks, as the group is called, is a part of the Mazatzal Mountains within Tonto National Forest. The peaks are approximately 80 miles east-northeast of Phoenix and the tallest of which is 7,657 feet above sea level. About 800 feet below the north peak is an area known as “the saddle”. It is approximately one thousand feet above the parking area, which is 18 miles of unpaved road away from Arizona State Highway 87. The image above shows the north peak on the left, and “the saddle” below that to the left.
Preparations
Of course, I had been preparing for this ritual throughout my seven-plus years as a martial artist; but for the hike itself, my preparations began the evening before. Knowing that there would be no honor in getting hurt due to lack of preparation, I took this task very seriously. I went to a local supermarket and purchased several liters of water, some Clif bars, and a Met-Rx bar for sustenance. I did not want to be weighted down by heavy food, either in my stomach or on my back, so the bars were an obvious choice. I also purchased batteries for my camera, knowing that I would want to take pictures along my journey.
After returning home from the store, I placed the water in the refrigerator and searched for other items that would be needed: boots, extra socks, gloves, cellular phone, flashlight, my Leatherman multi-tool, and, of course, the camera. With everything laid out and ready to go, I set my alarm clock for 5:40 and went to bed early; sleep was the one thing I was sure I couldn’t buy at the convenience store by the highway before the Four Peaks Road turnoff.
The following morning my wife made me oatmeal and wheat toast for breakfast while I showered, got dressed, finished packing my bag, and loaded up my cooler with water and Gatorade. By seven in the morning, I was on my way.
Half the Fun
They say that getting there is half the fun and for the most part, I disagree; but in this case, the drive was nice. I had the top off of my 1997 Jeep Wrangler and sixty miles per hour makes for some cold wind in the morning, even in Arizona. I must have been a sight to see along the Superstition Freeway, all bundled up in a sweatshirt and gloves, singing along with “Jesus Christ Superstar”. I actually missed my exit for the Beeline Highway and had to double-back, as it turned out, it wouldn’t be the last time I had to turn around that day…
By nine o’clock or so, I had already filled-up my tank with gasoline and was getting ready to start the eighteen-mile climb up Four Peaks Road. I expected the climb to take about an hour and since the going is slow, it always seems to take longer. The road practically requires four-wheel drive, but I didn’t use mine. The biggest problem one faces on that road are the washes (deep trenches formed by water coming down the mountain) and the rocks, so vehicular clearance is the key. I tend to drive fast and love that kind of driving; an average of eighteen miles per hour on that road is a pretty good clip. I reached the parking lot at the trailhead at around ten o’clock, ready to go… My original plan was to ride my mountain bike up to the saddle and hike the rest of the way, but the parks service bans bikes from the trails, so my plan had to be adjusted. Flexibility is the key here, as in life, plans do not always end up being reality and the ability to adjust is the ability to succeed.
Back in the Saddle
The quest for the summit can be broken down into two distinct parts: from the trailhead to the saddle, and from the saddle to the peak. I’d been to the saddle three times previous and to the peak twice, but this will be the first time on my own. The trail to the saddle is pretty easy and it’s my feeling that anyone in reasonable shape can get to the saddle, the key is to avoid stepping on any critters that you encounter along the way.
I reached the saddle by eleven o’clock and took my first break there. I ate one of the Clif bars and downed some Gatorade, then took the time to take a picture of what lay ahead. The crevasse that starts from just to the right of the top and cuts down into the dark is what was in store for me if I wanted to reach the peak. At this point, I thought I’d spend some more time sitting and drinking Gatorade. I figured that if I could reach the saddle on the way down by two in the afternoon, I would make it off of Four Peaks Road by dark.
Into Thin Air
The toughest part about the climb to the peak is the fact that you can never be one-hundred percent sure that the rock you grab to pull yourself up isn’t going to tumble down the mountain with you. A close second to that is the complete lack of direct sunlight and wind-chill factor that brings the temperature of the already-thin air near freezing. Those factors aside, the climb is nothing more than doing about forty pull-ups and a hundred or so “mountain climbers”, which I learned are appropriately named.
My original intent was to hike to the second peak and I thought I could get there by taking a turn off of the trail to the first peak and hiking a quick “down and up”. As it turned out, I was wrong. I spent about forty minutes struggling through some pretty thick brush and pulling cactus needles out of my hands (and rear) before I reached a drop-off that was too high to take safely, along and without ropes. Since discretion is the better part of valor, I chose turn around go for the north peak; getting injured would defeat the purpose of this ritual and only go to show that I lack the judgement necessary to be an effective leader. This is as close as I got to the second peak, which will have to wait for another day.
On Top of the World
It didn’t take me long to reach the north peak after abandoning my quest for the second peak, perhaps another ten minutes. Once on the north peak, I could see Apache and Roosevelt Lakes to the north, as well as back down to the saddle. I took the time to sit for a while, enjoy another Clif bar and some more Gatorade, and of course, take some pictures. The air on the peak is very clear, but the haze that has settled over the city of Phoenix makes it invisible, almost as if the rest of the world had vanished.
Conclusion
The trip back down the mountain was uneventful and I spent a lot of time thinking, as I did during the trip up. I thought about why I chose to undergo the ritual of shugyo and what it would mean to me. I have never thought of myself as someone with “something to prove”, so that was not my motivation. I think it had something to do with just being on my own again, in a manner of speaking. I chose to go when I did for several reasons; the first of which is because it was roughly one year since I first reached the peak. The second reason is because “the idea is to find a memorable occasion that will have emotional significance to those taking part. Then the shugyo serves as a cleansing, a right of passage.” (Morgan, pg. 60) Three weeks before was my wedding day and I can’t think of a more memorable occasion than that.
Perhaps the ritual helped to prepare me for married life, by giving me the confidence I know I’ll need to be a good husband, and someday a good father. Or perhaps the shugyo just served as a chapter marker in my life; the first page of the first chapter of my life together with Brandi. I don’t know. During the trip, I thought about a lot of things and planned on recounting them here, but in retrospect I do not think that was the point of my shugyo. The point was just in the thinking.
I learned about myself that day, spending time alone will do that. I realized that there are some things I like, and others that I don’t. I may not have reached all of my goals during that day, but I think that my understanding about why I am the way I am has improved considerably. And I believe that if I am to understand anyone or anything, I must first understand myself.
References
- Morgan, Forrest E. “Living the Martial Way: A Manual for the Way a Modern Warrior Should Think.” Barricade Books: New York, 1992, pp. 56-61.
- Photos from this day can be found here.
The Fourth Level of Forms
In my experience there are four levels of understanding forms. The first level is just being able to get through the pattern. The second level is being able to go through the pattern with appropriate speed and timing. The third level is knowing the interpretation of the moves and the meaning of the form. It is at this level that many martial artists stop. Granted, it can take a lifetime to truly understand the subtleties of the self-defense implications within the forms and I’m not suggesting that any martial artist should not continue to pursue this deeper understanding. However, reaching the fourth level of understanding, the ability to effectively teach the form to others, is often a skill that is overlooked in martial arts.
What makes being able to teach a form to others the fourth level of understanding is that it is the culmination of all of the other levels. Indeed, to be able to help a beginner to know the pattern, I’d have to know the pattern myself. To be able to help a beginner to execute the form with appropriate speed and timing, I’d have to be able to demonstrate appropriate speed and timing. Finally, to be able to demonstrate to a beginner the self-defense implications of a form, I would have to first understand them.
However, an important prerequisite for teaching is something that goes beyond what the teacher knows about the form itself. This prerequisite is, of course, effective communication skills. The best martial artist in the world would be a poor teacher if he or she could not communicate effectively. What’s tricky about teaching forms is that “effective” communication is defined solely by what helps the student to understand and this may differ from student to student. In to increase the chances that your methods of instruction will be universally effective, you need to be aware of the three main learning types: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.
Visual learners learn by seeing. In order to cater to visual learners you may have to adjust yourself so that you are always visible to the students. If there is a significant turn in the form, you may have to move to another position so that you are still in view of the students. Kinesthetic learners learn by doing. When teaching kinesthetic learners, it helps to have assistants who can mingle with the students and make minor physical adjustments to their positions. This may mean moving their head block into a more appropriate position or putting your hand in front of them to simulate a target.
Auditory learners learn by hearing. In order to teach auditory learners you must speak slowly and clearly, at the very least; but it is more than that. Many times instructors will go through a form and uses phrases such as “turn this way,” or “do this, then this.” These phrases are as meaningless to an auditory learner as they are to a reader. Instead, use precise names of techniques and directions, either relative or absolute. For example, saying “turn ninety degrees to your left” could mean the same saying “turn and fast the windows;” one is a relative direction, the other is absolute. However, it is generally better to use relative directions since they are more generic. If a student remembers to turn left by ninety degrees then they can do that whether they’re practicing at the dojo or at home.
Since many forms have sections that repeat, it is helpful to use language that makes that obvious. For example, the Okinawan Kenpo Karate form pinan nidan has a repeated section that includes a low cross-block, a break, a kick, and two punches. The first time this combination is done, it is with the right hand on top for the cross block, the right foot does the kick, and the left hand does the first punch. Everything is the opposite for the repeat of the combination. Below are two ways these combinations can be articulated:
Method #1
1. Turn and face this way in a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, right hand on top
3. Break out
4. Right leg kick, set it down in front
5. Right foot forward front stance
6. Left hand punch, right hand punch
7. Turn into a right foot forward front stance
8. Cross block low, left hand on top
9. Break out
10. Left leg kick, set it down in front
11. Left foot forward front stance
12. Right hand punch, left hand punch
Method #2:
1. Turn left 225 degrees into a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, back hand on top
3. Break out
4. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
5. Back hand punch, front hand punch
6. Turn right 90 degrees in the same stance
7. Cross block low, back hand on top
8. Break out
9. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
10. Back hand punch, front hand punch
Both methods accurately describe the techniques, but Method #2 is more effective because it makes the similarities between the two combinations obvious by using the same words. Notice that in Method #2, numbers two through five are the exact same as numbers seven through ten, but that’s not the case for Method #1. The reason this is better for auditory learners is that they don’t have to remember whether it is the right hand then the left hand in the first combination and then the left hand then the right hand in the second combination. They can just remember: back hand punch, front hand punch; and that will be correct for both.
By understanding these simple communication tricks and using them properly an instructor can help students get to the first level of forms, but in the process elevate themselves to the fourth level.
What makes being able to teach a form to others the fourth level of understanding is that it is the culmination of all of the other levels. Indeed, to be able to help a beginner to know the pattern, I’d have to know the pattern myself. To be able to help a beginner to execute the form with appropriate speed and timing, I’d have to be able to demonstrate appropriate speed and timing. Finally, to be able to demonstrate to a beginner the self-defense implications of a form, I would have to first understand them.
However, an important prerequisite for teaching is something that goes beyond what the teacher knows about the form itself. This prerequisite is, of course, effective communication skills. The best martial artist in the world would be a poor teacher if he or she could not communicate effectively. What’s tricky about teaching forms is that “effective” communication is defined solely by what helps the student to understand and this may differ from student to student. In to increase the chances that your methods of instruction will be universally effective, you need to be aware of the three main learning types: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.
Visual learners learn by seeing. In order to cater to visual learners you may have to adjust yourself so that you are always visible to the students. If there is a significant turn in the form, you may have to move to another position so that you are still in view of the students. Kinesthetic learners learn by doing. When teaching kinesthetic learners, it helps to have assistants who can mingle with the students and make minor physical adjustments to their positions. This may mean moving their head block into a more appropriate position or putting your hand in front of them to simulate a target.
Auditory learners learn by hearing. In order to teach auditory learners you must speak slowly and clearly, at the very least; but it is more than that. Many times instructors will go through a form and uses phrases such as “turn this way,” or “do this, then this.” These phrases are as meaningless to an auditory learner as they are to a reader. Instead, use precise names of techniques and directions, either relative or absolute. For example, saying “turn ninety degrees to your left” could mean the same saying “turn and fast the windows;” one is a relative direction, the other is absolute. However, it is generally better to use relative directions since they are more generic. If a student remembers to turn left by ninety degrees then they can do that whether they’re practicing at the dojo or at home.
Since many forms have sections that repeat, it is helpful to use language that makes that obvious. For example, the Okinawan Kenpo Karate form pinan nidan has a repeated section that includes a low cross-block, a break, a kick, and two punches. The first time this combination is done, it is with the right hand on top for the cross block, the right foot does the kick, and the left hand does the first punch. Everything is the opposite for the repeat of the combination. Below are two ways these combinations can be articulated:
Method #1
1. Turn and face this way in a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, right hand on top
3. Break out
4. Right leg kick, set it down in front
5. Right foot forward front stance
6. Left hand punch, right hand punch
7. Turn into a right foot forward front stance
8. Cross block low, left hand on top
9. Break out
10. Left leg kick, set it down in front
11. Left foot forward front stance
12. Right hand punch, left hand punch
Method #2:
1. Turn left 225 degrees into a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, back hand on top
3. Break out
4. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
5. Back hand punch, front hand punch
6. Turn right 90 degrees in the same stance
7. Cross block low, back hand on top
8. Break out
9. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
10. Back hand punch, front hand punch
Both methods accurately describe the techniques, but Method #2 is more effective because it makes the similarities between the two combinations obvious by using the same words. Notice that in Method #2, numbers two through five are the exact same as numbers seven through ten, but that’s not the case for Method #1. The reason this is better for auditory learners is that they don’t have to remember whether it is the right hand then the left hand in the first combination and then the left hand then the right hand in the second combination. They can just remember: back hand punch, front hand punch; and that will be correct for both.
By understanding these simple communication tricks and using them properly an instructor can help students get to the first level of forms, but in the process elevate themselves to the fourth level.
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Martial Artists
After I finished reading Steven Covey's The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, I began to consider how these habits would apply specifically to martial arts training. The habits are: be proactive; begin with the end in mind; put first things first; think win-win; seek first to understand, then to be understood; synergize; and sharpen the saw. Since my training has become such an integral part of my life, I was able to see how these habits could be applied to improve my training in a way similar to how they have improved my personal and professional life. Each habit can be interpreted in its own right, but all seven relate to one another in a way that can encompass every aspect of training in the arts.
Be Proactive. This habit is first for very good reason. It basically states that you are responsible for your own training. Your instructor may guide you along the way, but ultimately it is you that must choose the path your training will take. Martial arts training can be like putting a magnifying glass over your personality. It can make good people better, but on the same note can make bad people worse. The true goal of martial arts training should be to evaluate yourself through that magnifying glass and choose the right path.
Begin with the End in Mind. A martial artist who begins with the end in mind is able to see beyond day-to-day training to the greater goal of understanding and self-improvement. Since a martial artist's training, in the broad sense, is never really complete, this can refer to reaching certain goals that are part of that martial artist's training; goals such as earning the next belt level, or black belt, or simply becoming more comfortable executing complicated combinations. Beginning with the end in mind can allow certain aspects of training to be put into perspective. By not having goals that are so far off they seem unreachable, one is able to approach their day-to-day training knowing that they are taking steps towards a realizable goal.
Put First Things First. Every martial artist can probably remember being a beginner and having to do basics over and over, and thinking, "When is this going to end? When do we get to the good stuff?" Well, I've got news for all white belts: The basics are what it's all about. The basics are the first things taught because they are the foundation of all martial arts. Every advanced technique, every combination, and every form can all be broken down to the basics. Because of this, every training session should begin with the basics and build up from there. Consider this: If you are learning a form that contains a lot of a particular stance, strike, or block, what better way to improve the overall form than to simply practice that technique? By improving the basics that make up the forms, the forms themselves will improve as well.
Think Win-Win. This habit can be practiced each and every time you get the chance to work with another martial artist. If there is one thing that I've learned through my own teaching and studying is that one should never assume that they have nothing to learn from someone. Every martial artist is a student and every martial artist is a teacher, regardless of rank. Think of every person you meet as an opportunity to learn, and an opportunity to share what you have learned. This is a true win-win relationship.
Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood. This habit is especially important for instructors. People choose to become students of the martial arts for many different reasons. Since learning flows in both directions it is important for those who are the primary source of the flow to understand what motivates those whom they teach. Students are not simply troughs into which knowledge is dumped like so much water, nor are teachers simply spigots out of which knowledge flows. Teaching and learning are interactive processes and as a martial artist your primary goal should be understanding, both of the art and of the people.
Synergize. Synergy is when the relationship between the parts is a significant part of the whole. More simply, it is when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Synergy can occur for martial artists in many different ways. Synergy can occur during training with a partner because the training can be more significant and effective when two people who are striving for the same goal cooperate in order to reach it together; perhaps more quickly than they could have on their own. This type of synergy can be indicative of a win-win relationship between students. Synergy can also occur between different facets of a martial artist's training. Think of how, by putting first things first, you can improve your forms by improving your basics; or improve your knowledge of self-defense by increasing your knowledge of the interpretation of the forms. Synergy can also occur by training in several styles or cross-training. Think of how much your hand-work could improve by working regularly with a boxer. Think of how much your breathing could improve by incorporating yoga into your training. Why do you think so many three-hundred pound football players take ballet? The only caveat with this sort of training is that some have a tendency to fall into the jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none category. This can be avoided by choosing one style to be your "primary" style and using all of
your other training to augment it.
Sharpen the Saw. This is the habit of constant and continual learning. A martial artist's training is never "complete". If you feel you are at an impasse in your training in a particular style, perhaps it is time to move on; or perhaps it is time to re-evaluate your goals. It is possible that you have reached a plateau and must therefore train with even more vigilance to reach the next level. In any event, it is continual training and the practicing of these habits that lead to the highly effective martial artist.
Be Proactive. This habit is first for very good reason. It basically states that you are responsible for your own training. Your instructor may guide you along the way, but ultimately it is you that must choose the path your training will take. Martial arts training can be like putting a magnifying glass over your personality. It can make good people better, but on the same note can make bad people worse. The true goal of martial arts training should be to evaluate yourself through that magnifying glass and choose the right path.
Begin with the End in Mind. A martial artist who begins with the end in mind is able to see beyond day-to-day training to the greater goal of understanding and self-improvement. Since a martial artist's training, in the broad sense, is never really complete, this can refer to reaching certain goals that are part of that martial artist's training; goals such as earning the next belt level, or black belt, or simply becoming more comfortable executing complicated combinations. Beginning with the end in mind can allow certain aspects of training to be put into perspective. By not having goals that are so far off they seem unreachable, one is able to approach their day-to-day training knowing that they are taking steps towards a realizable goal.
Put First Things First. Every martial artist can probably remember being a beginner and having to do basics over and over, and thinking, "When is this going to end? When do we get to the good stuff?" Well, I've got news for all white belts: The basics are what it's all about. The basics are the first things taught because they are the foundation of all martial arts. Every advanced technique, every combination, and every form can all be broken down to the basics. Because of this, every training session should begin with the basics and build up from there. Consider this: If you are learning a form that contains a lot of a particular stance, strike, or block, what better way to improve the overall form than to simply practice that technique? By improving the basics that make up the forms, the forms themselves will improve as well.
Think Win-Win. This habit can be practiced each and every time you get the chance to work with another martial artist. If there is one thing that I've learned through my own teaching and studying is that one should never assume that they have nothing to learn from someone. Every martial artist is a student and every martial artist is a teacher, regardless of rank. Think of every person you meet as an opportunity to learn, and an opportunity to share what you have learned. This is a true win-win relationship.
Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood. This habit is especially important for instructors. People choose to become students of the martial arts for many different reasons. Since learning flows in both directions it is important for those who are the primary source of the flow to understand what motivates those whom they teach. Students are not simply troughs into which knowledge is dumped like so much water, nor are teachers simply spigots out of which knowledge flows. Teaching and learning are interactive processes and as a martial artist your primary goal should be understanding, both of the art and of the people.
Synergize. Synergy is when the relationship between the parts is a significant part of the whole. More simply, it is when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Synergy can occur for martial artists in many different ways. Synergy can occur during training with a partner because the training can be more significant and effective when two people who are striving for the same goal cooperate in order to reach it together; perhaps more quickly than they could have on their own. This type of synergy can be indicative of a win-win relationship between students. Synergy can also occur between different facets of a martial artist's training. Think of how, by putting first things first, you can improve your forms by improving your basics; or improve your knowledge of self-defense by increasing your knowledge of the interpretation of the forms. Synergy can also occur by training in several styles or cross-training. Think of how much your hand-work could improve by working regularly with a boxer. Think of how much your breathing could improve by incorporating yoga into your training. Why do you think so many three-hundred pound football players take ballet? The only caveat with this sort of training is that some have a tendency to fall into the jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none category. This can be avoided by choosing one style to be your "primary" style and using all of
your other training to augment it.
Sharpen the Saw. This is the habit of constant and continual learning. A martial artist's training is never "complete". If you feel you are at an impasse in your training in a particular style, perhaps it is time to move on; or perhaps it is time to re-evaluate your goals. It is possible that you have reached a plateau and must therefore train with even more vigilance to reach the next level. In any event, it is continual training and the practicing of these habits that lead to the highly effective martial artist.
Monday, November 23, 2009
How I Use Social Networking Sites
Hi!
I recently had a long conversation with Jeff Hodgkinson, project manager extraordinaire, LinkedIn stud, and all-around great guy. We mostly talked about social networking sites and their different usage models. Jeff asked me to write a blog post explaining how I use them, so here it is...
The main social networking sites I use are: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Blogger. I use each in a different way and tie them all together using my web site, which also contains other links. Here's my usage model for each of the main four:
Blogger
My blog is where I publish my writing. My blog posts tend to cover topics about which I've given considerable thought. They're not short posts, and while they may include links to other sites, they're mostly original. I have occasionally included large portions of other people's writing, but that's because that writing had a profound impact on me. I don't post every day, mostly due to time constraints. My blog is accessible to everyone on the Internet.
Twitter
Twitter is where I publish quick updates. My Twitter account is linked to both my LinkedIn and Facebook accounts. This means that my Twitter posts must be appropriate to both my personal and professional "circles," both of which will be defined below. I'll allow anyone to follow me on Twitter.
Facebook
Facebook is where I connect with those with whom I have a personal connection: Family, friends (new, long-time, and long-lost), and classmates (former and current). I have a few co-workers on my Facebook friends list, but no one that I don't consider a friend first and a co-worker second. My goal is not to collect as many friends as possible, so I don't accept friend requests from people I don't know personally. I also use Facebook for news and updates about other things that interest me.
LinkedIn
LinkedIn is where I connect with those with those with whom I have a personal and/or business-related connection. I'll pursue connections with people with whom I've shared one meeting, met briefly at a seminar, or had a interesting conversation with at a party. Like with Facebook, I won't accept a connection from just anyone, but the familiarity bar is lower for LinkedIn. Basically, anyone on my Facebook friends list would be a welcome addition to my LinkedIn connections list, but not necessarily vice versa. Some relationships I'd prefer to keep strictly business. I also use LinkedIn to build my network through groups and my resume through recommendations. I also have an on-line resume at VisualCV.
I understand that others have different models. Jeff, for example, is looking to maximize his LinkedIn network and will accept invitations from anyone. My cousin Timmy is a musician and seems to have a similar policy on Facebook. I also have friends who use Twitter as a way to share more information than I really need to know. There's nothing wrong with any of these models; they're just different than mine. What I'd encourage any social networker to do is to seriously consider what model they want for each site, then ensure the connections and content they share is consistent with that model.
Thanks,
Matt
I recently had a long conversation with Jeff Hodgkinson, project manager extraordinaire, LinkedIn stud, and all-around great guy. We mostly talked about social networking sites and their different usage models. Jeff asked me to write a blog post explaining how I use them, so here it is...
The main social networking sites I use are: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Blogger. I use each in a different way and tie them all together using my web site, which also contains other links. Here's my usage model for each of the main four:
Blogger
My blog is where I publish my writing. My blog posts tend to cover topics about which I've given considerable thought. They're not short posts, and while they may include links to other sites, they're mostly original. I have occasionally included large portions of other people's writing, but that's because that writing had a profound impact on me. I don't post every day, mostly due to time constraints. My blog is accessible to everyone on the Internet.
Twitter is where I publish quick updates. My Twitter account is linked to both my LinkedIn and Facebook accounts. This means that my Twitter posts must be appropriate to both my personal and professional "circles," both of which will be defined below. I'll allow anyone to follow me on Twitter.
Facebook is where I connect with those with whom I have a personal connection: Family, friends (new, long-time, and long-lost), and classmates (former and current). I have a few co-workers on my Facebook friends list, but no one that I don't consider a friend first and a co-worker second. My goal is not to collect as many friends as possible, so I don't accept friend requests from people I don't know personally. I also use Facebook for news and updates about other things that interest me.
LinkedIn is where I connect with those with those with whom I have a personal and/or business-related connection. I'll pursue connections with people with whom I've shared one meeting, met briefly at a seminar, or had a interesting conversation with at a party. Like with Facebook, I won't accept a connection from just anyone, but the familiarity bar is lower for LinkedIn. Basically, anyone on my Facebook friends list would be a welcome addition to my LinkedIn connections list, but not necessarily vice versa. Some relationships I'd prefer to keep strictly business. I also use LinkedIn to build my network through groups and my resume through recommendations. I also have an on-line resume at VisualCV.
I understand that others have different models. Jeff, for example, is looking to maximize his LinkedIn network and will accept invitations from anyone. My cousin Timmy is a musician and seems to have a similar policy on Facebook. I also have friends who use Twitter as a way to share more information than I really need to know. There's nothing wrong with any of these models; they're just different than mine. What I'd encourage any social networker to do is to seriously consider what model they want for each site, then ensure the connections and content they share is consistent with that model.
Thanks,
Matt
Friday, October 23, 2009
Walter Aircraft Engines
Hi!
Today we visited Walter Aircraft Engines. Walter is a wholly-owned subsidiary (since July 2008) of GE Aviation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric. This plant is also producing under capacity, but it seemed to be a much different feel than Avia. The manager who gave us the tour (blue shirt in the second picture) is from Ohio and previously held a similar post in Romania. Here are some pictures I took during the tour:
This is the metal as it comes into the factory:
This stores cut metal until the workers need it:
Here are some of the metal-working machines:
These are used to clean and plate the parts:
Here is a disassembled engine (sent in for an overhaul) waiting for new parts:
This is where the engines are reassembled:
This is where they're tested (a prop is attached and the doors are opened):
The most interesting aspects of our visit (in my opinion) were the difference between an acquisition by an Indian company (as in Avia's case) and an acquisition by a U.S. company (GE), and the difference between the Czech Republic and Romania.
While GE sent an American manager over, they didn't use a heavy-handed style with their newly acquired Czech employees. The focus was on the customer and seeking ways to reach common goals within the confines of Czech and GE culture. One example is safety. GE insisted that all employees wear safety glasses and offered to pay for prescription glasses for anyone who wanted them. This is standard in the U.S., but was new for the Czechs and they resisted. GE compromised by identifying areas where safety glasses weren't necessary and these are clearly marked.
Both Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and Romania were subject to communist rule post-WWII through the 80's. Czechoslovakia had what is called the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It was called that because things went so smoothly; in fact, no blood was shed as the people were ready, and the government was willing, to end communism. Contrast this with Romania, which had a very violent revolution leading to the public execution of Nicolae CeauÅŸescu and his wife, Elena. Unfortunately, all the Romanians did was cut off the head of the snake (so to speak), while the rest of the snake remained. By this, I mean that all the government/bureaucratic officials who implemented the communist government were left in place. Our host believes this is why the Czech Republic has progressed so much more quickly than Romania in the last 20 years.
It was an interesting visit and I'm sure Pratt & Whitney (rulers of the market Walter is going after with their new engine) will be taking notice soon.
Thanks,
Matt
Today we visited Walter Aircraft Engines. Walter is a wholly-owned subsidiary (since July 2008) of GE Aviation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric. This plant is also producing under capacity, but it seemed to be a much different feel than Avia. The manager who gave us the tour (blue shirt in the second picture) is from Ohio and previously held a similar post in Romania. Here are some pictures I took during the tour:
This is the metal as it comes into the factory:
This stores cut metal until the workers need it:
Here are some of the metal-working machines:
These are used to clean and plate the parts:
Here is a disassembled engine (sent in for an overhaul) waiting for new parts:
This is where the engines are reassembled:
This is where they're tested (a prop is attached and the doors are opened):
The most interesting aspects of our visit (in my opinion) were the difference between an acquisition by an Indian company (as in Avia's case) and an acquisition by a U.S. company (GE), and the difference between the Czech Republic and Romania.
While GE sent an American manager over, they didn't use a heavy-handed style with their newly acquired Czech employees. The focus was on the customer and seeking ways to reach common goals within the confines of Czech and GE culture. One example is safety. GE insisted that all employees wear safety glasses and offered to pay for prescription glasses for anyone who wanted them. This is standard in the U.S., but was new for the Czechs and they resisted. GE compromised by identifying areas where safety glasses weren't necessary and these are clearly marked.
Both Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and Romania were subject to communist rule post-WWII through the 80's. Czechoslovakia had what is called the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It was called that because things went so smoothly; in fact, no blood was shed as the people were ready, and the government was willing, to end communism. Contrast this with Romania, which had a very violent revolution leading to the public execution of Nicolae CeauÅŸescu and his wife, Elena. Unfortunately, all the Romanians did was cut off the head of the snake (so to speak), while the rest of the snake remained. By this, I mean that all the government/bureaucratic officials who implemented the communist government were left in place. Our host believes this is why the Czech Republic has progressed so much more quickly than Romania in the last 20 years.
It was an interesting visit and I'm sure Pratt & Whitney (rulers of the market Walter is going after with their new engine) will be taking notice soon.
Thanks,
Matt
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Avia Ashok Leyland Motors
Hi!
We had our first company visit today: Avia Ashok Leyland Motors. It is a Czech truck maker that was purchased by an Indian company, Ashok Leyland. The plant has a capacity of 20,000 trucks per year, but is currently producing only about 700. Workers are there only three days per week and they are clearly still WAY over capacity. Here are some pictures I took during our tour:
After the tour, we had a chance to speak with a few of the managers, two Czechs and two Indians. The Czechs were the production manager and the human resources manager. The Indians were the procurement manager (local) and a visiting VIP from another site (just got lucky). Here are a few things I learned.
- Czechs like to be managed by Czechs. Before being purchased by Ashok Leyland, Avia was owned by Daewoo. Daewoo sent Koreans to manage all aspects of the company and this was not appreciated.
- Prague does not have a very mobile workforce. In other words, people won't move for a job. The HR director told us that while hiring salesmen, they can really only hire people who already live in Prague.
Here are a few observations that I (and several others in the class) made during the discussion we had later:
- The production manager, who has been with the company for many decades, seems to be nostalgic for communism. He was pretty clear that it was a LOT easier to manage production when they didn't have to worry about planning or sales. They made a certain number of trucks each year that went to the Soviet Union and that was that.
- Avia seems to be dependent on the parent company for any and all strategy. They don't seem to have any kind of strategic goals for themselves. This is a recurring theme as we've heard from others that Czechs (in general) don't seem to think strategically. All the production improvements in the world won't help without a good marketing strategy to increase demand.
It was an interesting visit. It will be interesting to see how AALM does once the financial crisis is over and overall demand picks up.
Thanks,
Matt
We had our first company visit today: Avia Ashok Leyland Motors. It is a Czech truck maker that was purchased by an Indian company, Ashok Leyland. The plant has a capacity of 20,000 trucks per year, but is currently producing only about 700. Workers are there only three days per week and they are clearly still WAY over capacity. Here are some pictures I took during our tour:
After the tour, we had a chance to speak with a few of the managers, two Czechs and two Indians. The Czechs were the production manager and the human resources manager. The Indians were the procurement manager (local) and a visiting VIP from another site (just got lucky). Here are a few things I learned.
- Czechs like to be managed by Czechs. Before being purchased by Ashok Leyland, Avia was owned by Daewoo. Daewoo sent Koreans to manage all aspects of the company and this was not appreciated.
- Prague does not have a very mobile workforce. In other words, people won't move for a job. The HR director told us that while hiring salesmen, they can really only hire people who already live in Prague.
Here are a few observations that I (and several others in the class) made during the discussion we had later:
- The production manager, who has been with the company for many decades, seems to be nostalgic for communism. He was pretty clear that it was a LOT easier to manage production when they didn't have to worry about planning or sales. They made a certain number of trucks each year that went to the Soviet Union and that was that.
- Avia seems to be dependent on the parent company for any and all strategy. They don't seem to have any kind of strategic goals for themselves. This is a recurring theme as we've heard from others that Czechs (in general) don't seem to think strategically. All the production improvements in the world won't help without a good marketing strategy to increase demand.
It was an interesting visit. It will be interesting to see how AALM does once the financial crisis is over and overall demand picks up.
Thanks,
Matt
Monday, October 19, 2009
Reflection
Hi!
I arrived in Prague less than 24 hours ago. During that time I took a walking tour of the city and shot this photo of a modern building right across the street from a much older (and more typical in Prague) building:
Detractors complained that the building is ugly. Its architect encouraged people not to look at the glass, but rather in its reflection. In this, one sees the beauty of what is around it.
The same is true of people. No matter what we look like on the outside, we are still beautiful if we reflect beauty. The difference is that we choose what we reflect. What's in your reflection?
Thanks,
Matt
I arrived in Prague less than 24 hours ago. During that time I took a walking tour of the city and shot this photo of a modern building right across the street from a much older (and more typical in Prague) building:
Detractors complained that the building is ugly. Its architect encouraged people not to look at the glass, but rather in its reflection. In this, one sees the beauty of what is around it.
The same is true of people. No matter what we look like on the outside, we are still beautiful if we reflect beauty. The difference is that we choose what we reflect. What's in your reflection?
Thanks,
Matt
Sunday, September 27, 2009
My Chili Recipe
Hi!
It's starting to cool down a bit, so I've started making chili. I titled this post "My Chili Recipe" but it's really more of a philosophy. I'll list ingredients and amounts (assuming 24 cups), but it's really the approach that I think works for me. Let's start with the base. Here's what's in it:
- Four medium-sized tomatoes
- Two large Anaheim green chili peppers
- One large white onion
- Thirty ounces of tomato sauce
- Two teaspoons of ground cumin
- Three tablespoons of chili powder
- One-and-a-half teaspoons of pepper
- One teaspoon of celery salt
- One teaspoon of salt
- Two cups of water
This isn't very spicy. Ever since I discovered Dave's Gourmet, I know I can make any dish as hot as I want without having to worry about special peppers or powders. I can always add heat later one bowl at a time. What makes my approach different is that I put all that stuff in the blender so that my chili doesn't have chunks of vegetables leading to huge variations in the taste of each bite. For this batch size, I'll split everything into two blenders-full of ingredients and use the water to rinse the blender afterward so that none of the good stuff is left sticking to the side...
The base is put into a crock pot (slow cooker) at least eight hours before serving. I cook it for a long time on low to ensure that the beans are soft and everything else in the pot takes on the flavor of the base. What else goes into my chili depends on what strikes my fancy. I've added all of the following at one time or another:
- Kidney beans
- Garbanzo beans
- Northern beans
- White beans
- Black beans
- Corn
- Carnitas
- Ground turkey
- Ground beef
- Macaroni
- Rice
Basically, any kind of beans or meat would be fine. My rule of thumb is that if I'm adding meat (~1 lb), pasta, or rice, then I use four fifteen ounce cans of beans/corn. If not, I use six. I dump the cans of beans/corn one at a time into a strainer and rinse them off, removing casings and anything else that wouldn't look good on a spoon. I brown the ground meat, but don't fully cook it as if I were making tacos. When I use carnitas, it's usually purchased already spiced in packages (from TJ's) that are normally used in burritos. The rice is usually boil-in-a-bag or microwaveable. Rice and pasta shouldn't be added right away. In fact, the pasta (uncooked) shouldn't be added until ~20 before serving. A cup of either is plenty.
While it's cooking, I stir regularly, but not often. At first, it looks like there will be a LOT of liquid, but much of it will cook off...more will be absorbed by the pasta during its cooking. Even on low, the chili will be VERY hot, so I usually turn the heat off as I add the pasta. Stirring the pasta in and recovering it will ensure that it stays pretty hot and still cooks the pasta.
I've found over the years that I've experimented more and tried different kinds of meats and beans. It's fun and we usually end up with enough to last a few days. Serve with corn chips, soup crackers, or corn bread (The TJ's brand box is REALLY good.) and enjoy!
Take care!
Matt
It's starting to cool down a bit, so I've started making chili. I titled this post "My Chili Recipe" but it's really more of a philosophy. I'll list ingredients and amounts (assuming 24 cups), but it's really the approach that I think works for me. Let's start with the base. Here's what's in it:
- Four medium-sized tomatoes
- Two large Anaheim green chili peppers
- One large white onion
- Thirty ounces of tomato sauce
- Two teaspoons of ground cumin
- Three tablespoons of chili powder
- One-and-a-half teaspoons of pepper
- One teaspoon of celery salt
- One teaspoon of salt
- Two cups of water
This isn't very spicy. Ever since I discovered Dave's Gourmet, I know I can make any dish as hot as I want without having to worry about special peppers or powders. I can always add heat later one bowl at a time. What makes my approach different is that I put all that stuff in the blender so that my chili doesn't have chunks of vegetables leading to huge variations in the taste of each bite. For this batch size, I'll split everything into two blenders-full of ingredients and use the water to rinse the blender afterward so that none of the good stuff is left sticking to the side...
The base is put into a crock pot (slow cooker) at least eight hours before serving. I cook it for a long time on low to ensure that the beans are soft and everything else in the pot takes on the flavor of the base. What else goes into my chili depends on what strikes my fancy. I've added all of the following at one time or another:
- Kidney beans
- Garbanzo beans
- Northern beans
- White beans
- Black beans
- Corn
- Carnitas
- Ground turkey
- Ground beef
- Macaroni
- Rice
Basically, any kind of beans or meat would be fine. My rule of thumb is that if I'm adding meat (~1 lb), pasta, or rice, then I use four fifteen ounce cans of beans/corn. If not, I use six. I dump the cans of beans/corn one at a time into a strainer and rinse them off, removing casings and anything else that wouldn't look good on a spoon. I brown the ground meat, but don't fully cook it as if I were making tacos. When I use carnitas, it's usually purchased already spiced in packages (from TJ's) that are normally used in burritos. The rice is usually boil-in-a-bag or microwaveable. Rice and pasta shouldn't be added right away. In fact, the pasta (uncooked) shouldn't be added until ~20 before serving. A cup of either is plenty.
While it's cooking, I stir regularly, but not often. At first, it looks like there will be a LOT of liquid, but much of it will cook off...more will be absorbed by the pasta during its cooking. Even on low, the chili will be VERY hot, so I usually turn the heat off as I add the pasta. Stirring the pasta in and recovering it will ensure that it stays pretty hot and still cooks the pasta.
I've found over the years that I've experimented more and tried different kinds of meats and beans. It's fun and we usually end up with enough to last a few days. Serve with corn chips, soup crackers, or corn bread (The TJ's brand box is REALLY good.) and enjoy!
Take care!
Matt
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
George Washington's Rules of Civility
I found this on the NPR web site and wanted to share it:
As a young schoolboy in Virginia, George Washington took his first steps toward greatness by copying out by hand a list of 110 'Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation.' Based on a 16th-century set of precepts compiled for young gentlemen by Jesuit instructors, the Rules of Civility were one of the earliest and most powerful forces to shape America's first president, says historian Richard Brookhiser.
Most of the rules are concerned with details of etiquette, offering pointers on such issues as how to dress, walk, eat in public and address one's superiors. But in the introduction to the newly published Rules of Civility: The 110 Precepts That Guided Our First President in War and Peace, Brookhiser warns against dismissing the maxims as "mere" etiquette. "The rules address moral issues, but they address them indirectly," Brookhiser writes. "They seek to form the inner man (or boy) by shaping the outer."
Brookhiser says the advice the rules offer, though often outlandish in detail, is still applicable in our day and age: "Maybe they can work on us in our century as the Jesuits intended them to work in theirs — indirectly — by putting us in a more ambitious frame of mind."
The Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation
(For ease of reading, punctuation and spelling have been modernized.)
1. Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.
2. When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered.
3. Show nothing to your friend that may affright him.
4. In the presence of others, sing not to yourself with a humming voice, or drum with your fingers or feet.
5. If you cough, sneeze, sigh or yawn, do it not loud but privately, and speak not in your yawning, but put your handkerchief or hand before your face and turn aside.
6. Sleep not when others speak, sit not when others stand, speak not when you should hold your peace, walk not on when others stop.
7. Put not off your clothes in the presence of others, nor go out of your chamber half dressed.
8. At play and attire, it's good manners to give place to the last comer, and affect not to speak louder than ordinary.
9. Spit not into the fire, nor stoop low before it; neither put your hands into the flames to warm them, nor set your feet upon the fire, especially if there be meat before it.
10. When you sit down, keep your feet firm and even, without putting one on the other or crossing them.
11. Shift not yourself in the sight of others, nor gnaw your nails.
12. Shake not the head, feet, or legs; roll not the eyes; lift not one eyebrow higher than the other, wry not the mouth, and bedew no man's face with your spittle by approaching too near him when you speak.
13. Kill no vermin, or fleas, lice, ticks, etc. in the sight of others; if you see any filth or thick spittle put your foot dexterously upon it; if it be upon the clothes of your companions, put it off privately, and if it be upon your own clothes, return thanks to him who puts it off.
14. Turn not your back to others, especially in speaking; jog not the table or desk on which another reads or writes; lean not upon anyone.
15. Keep your nails clean and short, also your hands and teeth clean, yet without showing any great concern for them.
16. Do not puff up the cheeks, loll not out the tongue with the hands or beard, thrust out the lips or bite them, or keep the lips too open or too close.
17. Be no flatterer, neither play with any that delight not to be played withal.
18. Read no letter, books, or papers in company, but when there is a necessity for the doing of it, you must ask leave; come not near the books or writtings of another so as to read them unless desired, or give your opinion of them unasked. Also look not nigh when another is writing a letter.
19. Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave.
20. The gestures of the body must be suited to the discourse you are upon.
21. Reproach none for the infirmities of nature, nor delight to put them that have in mind of thereof.
22. Show not yourself glad at the misfortune of another though he were your enemy.
23. When you see a crime punished, you may be inwardly pleased; but always show pity to the suffering offender.
24. Do not laugh too loud or too much at any public spectacle.
25. Superfluous compliments and all affectation of ceremonies are to be avoided, yet where due they are not to be neglected.
26. In putting off your hat to persons of distinction, as noblemen, justices, churchmen, etc., make a reverence, bowing more or less according to the custom of the better bred, and quality of the persons. Among your equals expect not always that they should begin with you first, but to pull off the hat when there is no need is affectation. In the manner of saluting and resaluting in words, keep to the most usual custom.
27. 'Tis ill manners to bid one more eminent than yourself be covered, as well as not to do it to whom it is due. Likewise he that makes too much haste to put on his hat does not well, yet he ought to put it on at the first, or at most the second time of being asked. Now what is herein spoken, of qualification in behavior in saluting, ought also to be observed in taking of place and sitting down, for ceremonies without bounds are troublesome.
28. If any one come to speak to you while you are are sitting stand up, though he be your inferior, and when you present seats, let it be to everyone according to his degree.
29. When you meet with one of greater quality than yourself, stop and retire, especially if it be at a door or any straight place, to give way for him to pass.
30. In walking, the highest place in most countries seems to be on the right hand; therefore, place yourself on the left of him whom you desire to honor. But if three walk together the middest place is the most honorable; the wall is usally given to the most worthy if two walk together.
31. If anyone far surpasses others, either in age, estate, or merit, yet would give place to a meaner than himself in his own lodging or elsewhere, the one ought not to except it. So he on the other part should not use much earnestness nor offer it above once or twice.
32. To one that is your equal, or not much inferior, you are to give the chief place in your lodging, and he to whom it is offered ought at the first to refuse it, but at the second to accept though not without acknowledging his own unworthiness.
33. They that are in dignity or in office have in all places precedency, but whilst they are young, they ought to respect those that are their equals in birth or other qualities, though they have no public charge.
34. It is good manners to prefer them to whom we speak before ourselves, especially if they be above us, with whom in no sort we ought to begin.
35. Let your discourse with men of business be short and comprehensive.
36. Artificers and persons of low degree ought not to use many ceremonies to lords or others of high degree, but respect and highly honor then, and those of high degree ought to treat them with affability and courtesy, without arrogance.
37. In speaking to men of quality do not lean nor look them full in the face, nor approach too near them at left. Keep a full pace from them.
38. In visiting the sick, do not presently play the physician if you be not knowing therein.
39. In writing or speaking, give to every person his due title according to his degree and the custom of the place.
40. Strive not with your superior in argument, but always submit your judgment to others with modesty.
41. Undertake not to teach your equal in the art himself professes; it savors of arrogancy.
42. Let your ceremonies in courtesy be proper to the dignity of his place with whom you converse, for it is absurd to act the same with a clown and a prince.
43. Do not express joy before one sick in pain, for that contrary passion will aggravate his misery.
44. When a man does all he can, though it succeed not well, blame not him that did it.
45. Being to advise or reprehend any one, consider whether it ought to be in public or in private, and presently or at some other time; in what terms to do it; and in reproving show no signs of cholor but do it with all sweetness and mildness.
46. Take all admonitions thankfully in what time or place soever given, but afterwards not being culpable take a time and place convenient to let him know it that gave them.
47. Mock not nor jest at any thing of importance. Break no jests that are sharp, biting, and if you deliver any thing witty and pleasant, abstain from laughing thereat yourself.
48. Wherein you reprove another be unblameable yourself, for example is more prevalent than precepts.
49. Use no reproachful language against any one; neither curse nor revile.
50. Be not hasty to believe flying reports to the disparagement of any.
51. Wear not your clothes foul, or ripped, or dusty, but see they be brushed once every day at least and take heed that you approach not to any uncleaness.
52. In your apparel be modest and endeavor to accommodate nature, rather than to procure admiration; keep to the fashion of your equals, such as are civil and orderly with respect to time and places.
53. Run not in the streets, neither go too slowly, nor with mouth open; go not shaking of arms, nor upon the toes, kick not the earth with your feet, go not upon the toes, nor in a dancing fashion.
54. Play not the peacock, looking every where about you, to see if you be well decked, if your shoes fit well, if your stockings sit neatly and clothes handsomely.
55. Eat not in the streets, nor in the house, out of season.
56. Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone than in bad company.
57. In walking up and down in a house, only with one in company if he be greater than yourself, at the first give him the right hand and stop not till he does and be not the first that turns, and when you do turn let it be with your face towards him; if he be a man of great quality walk not with him cheek by jowl but somewhat behind him, but yet in such a manner that he may easily speak to you.
58. Let your conversation be without malice or envy, for 'tis a sign of a tractable and commendable nature, and in all causes of passion permit reason to govern.
59. Never express anything unbecoming, nor act against the rules moral before your inferiors.
60. Be not immodest in urging your friends to discover a secret.
61. Utter not base and frivolous things among grave and learned men, nor very difficult questions or subjects among the ignorant, or things hard to be believed; stuff not your discourse with sentences among your betters nor equals.
62. Speak not of doleful things in a time of mirth or at the table; speak not of melancholy things as death and wounds, and if others mention them, change if you can the discourse. Tell not your dreams, but to your intimate friend.
63. A man ought not to value himself of his achievements or rare qualities of wit; much less of his riches, virtue or kindred.
64. Break not a jest where none take pleasure in mirth; laugh not aloud, nor at all without occasion; deride no man's misfortune though there seem to be some cause.
65. Speak not injurious words neither in jest nor earnest; scoff at none although they give occasion.
66. Be not froward but friendly and courteous, the first to salute, hear and answer; and be not pensive when it's a time to converse.
67. Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.
68. Go not thither, where you know not whether you shall be welcome or not; give not advice without being asked, and when desired do it briefly.
69. If two contend together take not the part of either unconstrained, and be not obstinate in your own opinion. In things indifferent be of the major side.
70. Reprehend not the imperfections of others, for that belongs to parents, masters and superiors.
71. Gaze not on the marks or blemishes of others and ask not how they came. What you may speak in secret to your friend, deliver not before others.
72. Speak not in an unknown tongue in company but in your own language and that as those of quality do and not as the vulgar. Sublime matters treat seriously.
73. Think before you speak, pronounce not imperfectly, nor bring out your words too hastily, but orderly and distinctly.
74. When another speaks, be attentive yourself and disturb not the audience. If any hesitate in his words, help him not nor prompt him without desired. Interrupt him not, nor answer him till his speech be ended.
75. In the midst of discourse ask not of what one treats, but if you perceive any stop because of your coming, you may well entreat him gently to proceed. If a person of quality comes in while you're conversing, it's handsome to repeat what was said before.
76. While you are talking, point not with your finger at him of whom you discourse, nor approach too near him to whom you talk, especially to his face.
77. Treat with men at fit times about business and whisper not in the company of others.
78. Make no comparisons and if any of the company be commended for any brave act of virtue, commend not another for the same.
79. Be not apt to relate news if you know not the truth thereof. In discoursing of things you have heard, name not your author. Always a secret discover not.
80. Be not tedious in discourse or in reading unless you find the company pleased therewith.
81. Be not curious to know the affairs of others, neither approach those that speak in private.
82. Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.
83. When you deliver a matter do it without passion and with discretion, however mean the person be you do it to.
84. When your superiors talk to anybody hearken not, neither speak nor laugh.
85. In company of those of higher quality than yourself, speak not 'til you are asked a question, then stand upright, put off your hat and answer in few words.
86. In disputes, be not so desirous to overcome as not to give liberty to each one to deliver his opinion and submit to the judgment of the major part, especially if they are judges of the dispute.
87. Let your carriage be such as becomes a man grave, settled and attentive to that which is spoken. Contradict not at every turn what others say.
88. Be not tedious in discourse, make not many digressions, nor repeat often the same manner of discourse.
89. Speak not evil of the absent, for it is unjust.
90. Being set at meat scratch not, neither spit, cough or blow your nose except there's a necessity for it.
91. Make no show of taking great delight in your victuals. Feed not with greediness. Eat your bread with a knife. Lean not on the table, neither find fault with what you eat.
92. Take no salt or cut bread with your knife greasy.
93. Entertaining anyone at table it is decent to present him with meat. Undertake not to help others undesired by the master.
94. If you soak bread in the sauce, let it be no more than what you put in your mouth at a time, and blow not your broth at table but stay 'til it cools of itself.
95. Put not your meat to your mouth with your knife in your hand; neither spit forth the stones of any fruit pie upon a dish nor cast anything under the table.
96. It's unbecoming to heap much to one's mea. Keep your fingers clean and when foul wipe them on a corner of your table napkin.
97. Put not another bite into your mouth 'til the former be swallowed. Let not your morsels be too big for the jowls.
98. Drink not nor talk with your mouth full; neither gaze about you while you are drinking.
99. Drink not too leisurely nor yet too hastily. Before and after drinking wipe your lips. Breathe not then or ever with too great a noise, for it is uncivil.
100. Cleanse not your teeth with the tablecloth, napkin, fork or knife, but if others do it, let it be done with a pick tooth.
101. Rinse not your mouth in the presence of others.
102. It is out of use to call upon the company often to eat. Nor need you drink to others every time you drink.
103. In company of your betters be not longer in eating than they are. Lay not your arm but only your hand upon the table.
104. It belongs to the chiefest in company to unfold his napkin and fall to meat first. But he ought then to begin in time and to dispatch with dexterity that the slowest may have time allowed him.
105. Be not angry at table whatever happens and if you have reason to be so, show it not but on a cheerful countenance especially if there be strangers, for good humor makes one dish of meat a feast.
106. Set not yourself at the upper of the table but if it be your due, or that the master of the house will have it so. Contend not, lest you should trouble the company.
107. If others talk at table be attentive, but talk not with meat in your mouth.
108. When you speak of God or His attributes, let it be seriously and with reverence. Honor and obey your natural parents although they be poor.
109. Let your recreations be manful not sinful.
110. Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.
As a young schoolboy in Virginia, George Washington took his first steps toward greatness by copying out by hand a list of 110 'Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation.' Based on a 16th-century set of precepts compiled for young gentlemen by Jesuit instructors, the Rules of Civility were one of the earliest and most powerful forces to shape America's first president, says historian Richard Brookhiser.
Most of the rules are concerned with details of etiquette, offering pointers on such issues as how to dress, walk, eat in public and address one's superiors. But in the introduction to the newly published Rules of Civility: The 110 Precepts That Guided Our First President in War and Peace, Brookhiser warns against dismissing the maxims as "mere" etiquette. "The rules address moral issues, but they address them indirectly," Brookhiser writes. "They seek to form the inner man (or boy) by shaping the outer."
Brookhiser says the advice the rules offer, though often outlandish in detail, is still applicable in our day and age: "Maybe they can work on us in our century as the Jesuits intended them to work in theirs — indirectly — by putting us in a more ambitious frame of mind."
The Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation
(For ease of reading, punctuation and spelling have been modernized.)
1. Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.
2. When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered.
3. Show nothing to your friend that may affright him.
4. In the presence of others, sing not to yourself with a humming voice, or drum with your fingers or feet.
5. If you cough, sneeze, sigh or yawn, do it not loud but privately, and speak not in your yawning, but put your handkerchief or hand before your face and turn aside.
6. Sleep not when others speak, sit not when others stand, speak not when you should hold your peace, walk not on when others stop.
7. Put not off your clothes in the presence of others, nor go out of your chamber half dressed.
8. At play and attire, it's good manners to give place to the last comer, and affect not to speak louder than ordinary.
9. Spit not into the fire, nor stoop low before it; neither put your hands into the flames to warm them, nor set your feet upon the fire, especially if there be meat before it.
10. When you sit down, keep your feet firm and even, without putting one on the other or crossing them.
11. Shift not yourself in the sight of others, nor gnaw your nails.
12. Shake not the head, feet, or legs; roll not the eyes; lift not one eyebrow higher than the other, wry not the mouth, and bedew no man's face with your spittle by approaching too near him when you speak.
13. Kill no vermin, or fleas, lice, ticks, etc. in the sight of others; if you see any filth or thick spittle put your foot dexterously upon it; if it be upon the clothes of your companions, put it off privately, and if it be upon your own clothes, return thanks to him who puts it off.
14. Turn not your back to others, especially in speaking; jog not the table or desk on which another reads or writes; lean not upon anyone.
15. Keep your nails clean and short, also your hands and teeth clean, yet without showing any great concern for them.
16. Do not puff up the cheeks, loll not out the tongue with the hands or beard, thrust out the lips or bite them, or keep the lips too open or too close.
17. Be no flatterer, neither play with any that delight not to be played withal.
18. Read no letter, books, or papers in company, but when there is a necessity for the doing of it, you must ask leave; come not near the books or writtings of another so as to read them unless desired, or give your opinion of them unasked. Also look not nigh when another is writing a letter.
19. Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave.
20. The gestures of the body must be suited to the discourse you are upon.
21. Reproach none for the infirmities of nature, nor delight to put them that have in mind of thereof.
22. Show not yourself glad at the misfortune of another though he were your enemy.
23. When you see a crime punished, you may be inwardly pleased; but always show pity to the suffering offender.
24. Do not laugh too loud or too much at any public spectacle.
25. Superfluous compliments and all affectation of ceremonies are to be avoided, yet where due they are not to be neglected.
26. In putting off your hat to persons of distinction, as noblemen, justices, churchmen, etc., make a reverence, bowing more or less according to the custom of the better bred, and quality of the persons. Among your equals expect not always that they should begin with you first, but to pull off the hat when there is no need is affectation. In the manner of saluting and resaluting in words, keep to the most usual custom.
27. 'Tis ill manners to bid one more eminent than yourself be covered, as well as not to do it to whom it is due. Likewise he that makes too much haste to put on his hat does not well, yet he ought to put it on at the first, or at most the second time of being asked. Now what is herein spoken, of qualification in behavior in saluting, ought also to be observed in taking of place and sitting down, for ceremonies without bounds are troublesome.
28. If any one come to speak to you while you are are sitting stand up, though he be your inferior, and when you present seats, let it be to everyone according to his degree.
29. When you meet with one of greater quality than yourself, stop and retire, especially if it be at a door or any straight place, to give way for him to pass.
30. In walking, the highest place in most countries seems to be on the right hand; therefore, place yourself on the left of him whom you desire to honor. But if three walk together the middest place is the most honorable; the wall is usally given to the most worthy if two walk together.
31. If anyone far surpasses others, either in age, estate, or merit, yet would give place to a meaner than himself in his own lodging or elsewhere, the one ought not to except it. So he on the other part should not use much earnestness nor offer it above once or twice.
32. To one that is your equal, or not much inferior, you are to give the chief place in your lodging, and he to whom it is offered ought at the first to refuse it, but at the second to accept though not without acknowledging his own unworthiness.
33. They that are in dignity or in office have in all places precedency, but whilst they are young, they ought to respect those that are their equals in birth or other qualities, though they have no public charge.
34. It is good manners to prefer them to whom we speak before ourselves, especially if they be above us, with whom in no sort we ought to begin.
35. Let your discourse with men of business be short and comprehensive.
36. Artificers and persons of low degree ought not to use many ceremonies to lords or others of high degree, but respect and highly honor then, and those of high degree ought to treat them with affability and courtesy, without arrogance.
37. In speaking to men of quality do not lean nor look them full in the face, nor approach too near them at left. Keep a full pace from them.
38. In visiting the sick, do not presently play the physician if you be not knowing therein.
39. In writing or speaking, give to every person his due title according to his degree and the custom of the place.
40. Strive not with your superior in argument, but always submit your judgment to others with modesty.
41. Undertake not to teach your equal in the art himself professes; it savors of arrogancy.
42. Let your ceremonies in courtesy be proper to the dignity of his place with whom you converse, for it is absurd to act the same with a clown and a prince.
43. Do not express joy before one sick in pain, for that contrary passion will aggravate his misery.
44. When a man does all he can, though it succeed not well, blame not him that did it.
45. Being to advise or reprehend any one, consider whether it ought to be in public or in private, and presently or at some other time; in what terms to do it; and in reproving show no signs of cholor but do it with all sweetness and mildness.
46. Take all admonitions thankfully in what time or place soever given, but afterwards not being culpable take a time and place convenient to let him know it that gave them.
47. Mock not nor jest at any thing of importance. Break no jests that are sharp, biting, and if you deliver any thing witty and pleasant, abstain from laughing thereat yourself.
48. Wherein you reprove another be unblameable yourself, for example is more prevalent than precepts.
49. Use no reproachful language against any one; neither curse nor revile.
50. Be not hasty to believe flying reports to the disparagement of any.
51. Wear not your clothes foul, or ripped, or dusty, but see they be brushed once every day at least and take heed that you approach not to any uncleaness.
52. In your apparel be modest and endeavor to accommodate nature, rather than to procure admiration; keep to the fashion of your equals, such as are civil and orderly with respect to time and places.
53. Run not in the streets, neither go too slowly, nor with mouth open; go not shaking of arms, nor upon the toes, kick not the earth with your feet, go not upon the toes, nor in a dancing fashion.
54. Play not the peacock, looking every where about you, to see if you be well decked, if your shoes fit well, if your stockings sit neatly and clothes handsomely.
55. Eat not in the streets, nor in the house, out of season.
56. Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone than in bad company.
57. In walking up and down in a house, only with one in company if he be greater than yourself, at the first give him the right hand and stop not till he does and be not the first that turns, and when you do turn let it be with your face towards him; if he be a man of great quality walk not with him cheek by jowl but somewhat behind him, but yet in such a manner that he may easily speak to you.
58. Let your conversation be without malice or envy, for 'tis a sign of a tractable and commendable nature, and in all causes of passion permit reason to govern.
59. Never express anything unbecoming, nor act against the rules moral before your inferiors.
60. Be not immodest in urging your friends to discover a secret.
61. Utter not base and frivolous things among grave and learned men, nor very difficult questions or subjects among the ignorant, or things hard to be believed; stuff not your discourse with sentences among your betters nor equals.
62. Speak not of doleful things in a time of mirth or at the table; speak not of melancholy things as death and wounds, and if others mention them, change if you can the discourse. Tell not your dreams, but to your intimate friend.
63. A man ought not to value himself of his achievements or rare qualities of wit; much less of his riches, virtue or kindred.
64. Break not a jest where none take pleasure in mirth; laugh not aloud, nor at all without occasion; deride no man's misfortune though there seem to be some cause.
65. Speak not injurious words neither in jest nor earnest; scoff at none although they give occasion.
66. Be not froward but friendly and courteous, the first to salute, hear and answer; and be not pensive when it's a time to converse.
67. Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.
68. Go not thither, where you know not whether you shall be welcome or not; give not advice without being asked, and when desired do it briefly.
69. If two contend together take not the part of either unconstrained, and be not obstinate in your own opinion. In things indifferent be of the major side.
70. Reprehend not the imperfections of others, for that belongs to parents, masters and superiors.
71. Gaze not on the marks or blemishes of others and ask not how they came. What you may speak in secret to your friend, deliver not before others.
72. Speak not in an unknown tongue in company but in your own language and that as those of quality do and not as the vulgar. Sublime matters treat seriously.
73. Think before you speak, pronounce not imperfectly, nor bring out your words too hastily, but orderly and distinctly.
74. When another speaks, be attentive yourself and disturb not the audience. If any hesitate in his words, help him not nor prompt him without desired. Interrupt him not, nor answer him till his speech be ended.
75. In the midst of discourse ask not of what one treats, but if you perceive any stop because of your coming, you may well entreat him gently to proceed. If a person of quality comes in while you're conversing, it's handsome to repeat what was said before.
76. While you are talking, point not with your finger at him of whom you discourse, nor approach too near him to whom you talk, especially to his face.
77. Treat with men at fit times about business and whisper not in the company of others.
78. Make no comparisons and if any of the company be commended for any brave act of virtue, commend not another for the same.
79. Be not apt to relate news if you know not the truth thereof. In discoursing of things you have heard, name not your author. Always a secret discover not.
80. Be not tedious in discourse or in reading unless you find the company pleased therewith.
81. Be not curious to know the affairs of others, neither approach those that speak in private.
82. Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.
83. When you deliver a matter do it without passion and with discretion, however mean the person be you do it to.
84. When your superiors talk to anybody hearken not, neither speak nor laugh.
85. In company of those of higher quality than yourself, speak not 'til you are asked a question, then stand upright, put off your hat and answer in few words.
86. In disputes, be not so desirous to overcome as not to give liberty to each one to deliver his opinion and submit to the judgment of the major part, especially if they are judges of the dispute.
87. Let your carriage be such as becomes a man grave, settled and attentive to that which is spoken. Contradict not at every turn what others say.
88. Be not tedious in discourse, make not many digressions, nor repeat often the same manner of discourse.
89. Speak not evil of the absent, for it is unjust.
90. Being set at meat scratch not, neither spit, cough or blow your nose except there's a necessity for it.
91. Make no show of taking great delight in your victuals. Feed not with greediness. Eat your bread with a knife. Lean not on the table, neither find fault with what you eat.
92. Take no salt or cut bread with your knife greasy.
93. Entertaining anyone at table it is decent to present him with meat. Undertake not to help others undesired by the master.
94. If you soak bread in the sauce, let it be no more than what you put in your mouth at a time, and blow not your broth at table but stay 'til it cools of itself.
95. Put not your meat to your mouth with your knife in your hand; neither spit forth the stones of any fruit pie upon a dish nor cast anything under the table.
96. It's unbecoming to heap much to one's mea. Keep your fingers clean and when foul wipe them on a corner of your table napkin.
97. Put not another bite into your mouth 'til the former be swallowed. Let not your morsels be too big for the jowls.
98. Drink not nor talk with your mouth full; neither gaze about you while you are drinking.
99. Drink not too leisurely nor yet too hastily. Before and after drinking wipe your lips. Breathe not then or ever with too great a noise, for it is uncivil.
100. Cleanse not your teeth with the tablecloth, napkin, fork or knife, but if others do it, let it be done with a pick tooth.
101. Rinse not your mouth in the presence of others.
102. It is out of use to call upon the company often to eat. Nor need you drink to others every time you drink.
103. In company of your betters be not longer in eating than they are. Lay not your arm but only your hand upon the table.
104. It belongs to the chiefest in company to unfold his napkin and fall to meat first. But he ought then to begin in time and to dispatch with dexterity that the slowest may have time allowed him.
105. Be not angry at table whatever happens and if you have reason to be so, show it not but on a cheerful countenance especially if there be strangers, for good humor makes one dish of meat a feast.
106. Set not yourself at the upper of the table but if it be your due, or that the master of the house will have it so. Contend not, lest you should trouble the company.
107. If others talk at table be attentive, but talk not with meat in your mouth.
108. When you speak of God or His attributes, let it be seriously and with reverence. Honor and obey your natural parents although they be poor.
109. Let your recreations be manful not sinful.
110. Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)