I wrote this 10 years ago, but it's just as interesting today, I think...
Back in the 1950’s a lot of people smoked, and many of them did not understand the risks. There are a lot of lawsuits currently going on that claim the cigarette industry knew the risks and ignored them to make a buck. The main issue of these lawsuits is that the industry not only ignored the risks and aided in keeping the public ignorant of these risks, but also took steps to increase the addictive nature of cigarettes. Furthermore, it is said that they targeted children to insure that they’ll have another generation of smokers to keep the profits coming after the current generation dies off.
It seems to me that the key issue in these lawsuits is not whether cigarettes are unhealthy, because I can’t imagine somebody could think otherwise of burning something and sucking the smoke into their lungs…but since we live in a society that used to attach leaches to sick people to “bleed out” the illness then I guess I’ll have to let that one go. The issue seems to be whether the tobacco industry knew about these extent of the health risks, which range from cancer in the smoker to chronic asthma in the children of smokers, and hid this information from the public. Beyond that, however, is the question of whether cigarette makers also made their product more addictive by inflating the level of nicotine, the addictive drug in cigarettes. Forget about tobacco being a “tumor-causing, teeth-staining, smelling, puking, habit;” it’s an addiction, plain and simple. I have a habit of running my fingers through my hair when I’m thinking, but I’ve never said, “I’ve got to go outside in the freezing-cold because I need to run my fingers through my hair.”
The result of much of the so-called “tobacco legislation” is that tobacco companies now have to put larger warning labels on their products. They have to take steps to discourage underage smoking…sort of like having a “marketing” and an “anti-marketing” department. (How would you like to work in an industry that MUST take steps to discourage people from buying your product?) They’re also making billion-dollar donations to states in order to subsidize health-care costs for tobacco-related illness.
Back in the 50’s many people smoked because it was considered “cool.” How cool James Dean would have been as a 70-year-old cancer patient instead of a Rebel Without a Cause is something we’ll never know. Nevertheless, cigarettes were portrayed as something “cool” people had and if you weren’t smoking you were “square.” These days fewer cool people smoke because the health risks are clear, but there’s one thing they do have and that’s CELL PHONES!! Cell phones are not at all like cigarettes, right? They pose no health risks, right? Cellular phone companies don’t target children, right? Wrong, wrong, and wrong!
Many families have microwave ovens in their homes. Microwaves are used to cook food and the ovens provide excellent protection from the harmful radiation with all sorts of seals and automatic-shut-off mechanisms; but what about cellular phones? These phones also produce microwaves and the most common way to use them is to put one against your head. Most people wouldn’t dream of putting their head in a microwave oven, then again most people wouldn’t dream of wrapping their lips around the exhaust pipe of a running automobile, but inhaling the carbon monoxide in cigarette smoke amounts to a similar analogy.
In recent studies, mice exposed to microwaves mimicking the effect of cellular phones have had significant memory loss to the tune of forgetting how to swim; so if follows that putting a microwave-emitting device against one’s head is not particularly wise, but hey, as long as it’s “cool” right? What the heck…if the cool people of the 50’s could ignore the possibility of lung cancer why can’t the cool people of the 90’s ignore the possibility of brain cancer?
This danger seems to be greater with children because studies show that the penetration of radiation from the antenna goes deeper into a child’s brain because their heads and brains are smaller, but also because the conductivity properties of those tissues that are still developing differ, and it facilitates more of an exposure. Regardless, the cell-phone industry appears to be targeting young people with phone models bearing the likeness of various Disney characters and communications providers are encouraging people to switch to cellular-only calling plans. In the words of CNN anchor, Wolf Blitzer, “What the cellular-phone industry is now doing is what the tobacco industry did with its Joe Camel ads.”
Without much research savvy, you can find conflicting evidence about whether cellular phones pose health risks, much in the same way you can find conflicting evidence about tobacco. The similarities do not end there, though. Much of the research conducted that concluded that cigarettes do not pose a health risk, was (surprise!) funded by the tobacco industry. So when I read a quote stating, “We believe that wireless phones are safe, including use by children.” I’m not surprised to also read that it was a spokesman for AT&T Wireless that made it.
Do the companies who manufacture and sell cellular phones and calling plans know that microwave radiation is harmful? Sure. Do they sell them anyway in hopes that they’ll make a buck? You bet. So now that we’ve got the addiction for the next generation underway, we can look forward to the lawsuits continuing…but next time the defendants won’t be Philip Morris and R. J. Reynolds, they’ll be Motorola, Nokia, and Ericsson.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Shugyo: A Ritual of Training
In Forrest Morgan’s 1992 book, Living the Martial Way, he defines shugyo as “austere training”. Shugyo is a “ritual observed in some way, shape, or form by every warrior society in the world. It involved hardening the spirit through severe training or some extreme physical test. The ritual takes different forms in different cultures, but they all have a common element: the warrior drives himself, or is driven, to a level of endurance beyond what he previously believed possible. The experience is both grueling and frightening, but the warrior emerges from the ordeal feeling purified. One who has experienced this kind of training is never quite the same afterwards” (Morgan, pg. 59).
Why Shugyo?
For the samuari, shugyo was a way for warriors to build discipline during a time when their very survival depended on the preparedness for battle. So why would people today need to participate in a ritual that is meant to prepare them for a situation that they are not likely to encounter? Psychiatrist and jujutsu stylist, Dr. Alan Hasegawa, explained it best when he wrote: “In an affluent society, it is necessary to purposely seek out the challenges which were once a part of daily life of the warrior. This drive to test the limits of one’s own potential is universal (1987).”
Mr. Morgan recounts a story of shugyo from his days as a nineteen-year old taekwondo student; the story involved intense training during his first martial arts seminar. “Shugyo doesn’t have to take place in the training hall, and if your spirit is strong, you don’t need someone else to drive you on. If fact, undergoing shugyo along, with no one else to motivate you or look after you safety, can temper your spirit like nothing else can. And there’s no warrior ritual more traditional than solitary shugyo” (Morgan, pg. 60). On the seventh of November, nineteen-hundred, ninety-eight, I engaged in the ritual of solitary shugyo; and this paper is a recount of my actions, thoughts, and feelings while climbing the north of the four peaks, east-northeast of Phoenix, Arizona.
Background
Four Peaks, as the group is called, is a part of the Mazatzal Mountains within Tonto National Forest. The peaks are approximately 80 miles east-northeast of Phoenix and the tallest of which is 7,657 feet above sea level. About 800 feet below the north peak is an area known as “the saddle”. It is approximately one thousand feet above the parking area, which is 18 miles of unpaved road away from Arizona State Highway 87. The image above shows the north peak on the left, and “the saddle” below that to the left.
Preparations
Of course, I had been preparing for this ritual throughout my seven-plus years as a martial artist; but for the hike itself, my preparations began the evening before. Knowing that there would be no honor in getting hurt due to lack of preparation, I took this task very seriously. I went to a local supermarket and purchased several liters of water, some Clif bars, and a Met-Rx bar for sustenance. I did not want to be weighted down by heavy food, either in my stomach or on my back, so the bars were an obvious choice. I also purchased batteries for my camera, knowing that I would want to take pictures along my journey.
After returning home from the store, I placed the water in the refrigerator and searched for other items that would be needed: boots, extra socks, gloves, cellular phone, flashlight, my Leatherman multi-tool, and, of course, the camera. With everything laid out and ready to go, I set my alarm clock for 5:40 and went to bed early; sleep was the one thing I was sure I couldn’t buy at the convenience store by the highway before the Four Peaks Road turnoff.
The following morning my wife made me oatmeal and wheat toast for breakfast while I showered, got dressed, finished packing my bag, and loaded up my cooler with water and Gatorade. By seven in the morning, I was on my way.
Half the Fun
They say that getting there is half the fun and for the most part, I disagree; but in this case, the drive was nice. I had the top off of my 1997 Jeep Wrangler and sixty miles per hour makes for some cold wind in the morning, even in Arizona. I must have been a sight to see along the Superstition Freeway, all bundled up in a sweatshirt and gloves, singing along with “Jesus Christ Superstar”. I actually missed my exit for the Beeline Highway and had to double-back, as it turned out, it wouldn’t be the last time I had to turn around that day…
By nine o’clock or so, I had already filled-up my tank with gasoline and was getting ready to start the eighteen-mile climb up Four Peaks Road. I expected the climb to take about an hour and since the going is slow, it always seems to take longer. The road practically requires four-wheel drive, but I didn’t use mine. The biggest problem one faces on that road are the washes (deep trenches formed by water coming down the mountain) and the rocks, so vehicular clearance is the key. I tend to drive fast and love that kind of driving; an average of eighteen miles per hour on that road is a pretty good clip. I reached the parking lot at the trailhead at around ten o’clock, ready to go… My original plan was to ride my mountain bike up to the saddle and hike the rest of the way, but the parks service bans bikes from the trails, so my plan had to be adjusted. Flexibility is the key here, as in life, plans do not always end up being reality and the ability to adjust is the ability to succeed.
Back in the Saddle
The quest for the summit can be broken down into two distinct parts: from the trailhead to the saddle, and from the saddle to the peak. I’d been to the saddle three times previous and to the peak twice, but this will be the first time on my own. The trail to the saddle is pretty easy and it’s my feeling that anyone in reasonable shape can get to the saddle, the key is to avoid stepping on any critters that you encounter along the way.
I reached the saddle by eleven o’clock and took my first break there. I ate one of the Clif bars and downed some Gatorade, then took the time to take a picture of what lay ahead. The crevasse that starts from just to the right of the top and cuts down into the dark is what was in store for me if I wanted to reach the peak. At this point, I thought I’d spend some more time sitting and drinking Gatorade. I figured that if I could reach the saddle on the way down by two in the afternoon, I would make it off of Four Peaks Road by dark.
Into Thin Air
The toughest part about the climb to the peak is the fact that you can never be one-hundred percent sure that the rock you grab to pull yourself up isn’t going to tumble down the mountain with you. A close second to that is the complete lack of direct sunlight and wind-chill factor that brings the temperature of the already-thin air near freezing. Those factors aside, the climb is nothing more than doing about forty pull-ups and a hundred or so “mountain climbers”, which I learned are appropriately named.
My original intent was to hike to the second peak and I thought I could get there by taking a turn off of the trail to the first peak and hiking a quick “down and up”. As it turned out, I was wrong. I spent about forty minutes struggling through some pretty thick brush and pulling cactus needles out of my hands (and rear) before I reached a drop-off that was too high to take safely, along and without ropes. Since discretion is the better part of valor, I chose turn around go for the north peak; getting injured would defeat the purpose of this ritual and only go to show that I lack the judgement necessary to be an effective leader. This is as close as I got to the second peak, which will have to wait for another day.
On Top of the World
It didn’t take me long to reach the north peak after abandoning my quest for the second peak, perhaps another ten minutes. Once on the north peak, I could see Apache and Roosevelt Lakes to the north, as well as back down to the saddle. I took the time to sit for a while, enjoy another Clif bar and some more Gatorade, and of course, take some pictures. The air on the peak is very clear, but the haze that has settled over the city of Phoenix makes it invisible, almost as if the rest of the world had vanished.
Conclusion
The trip back down the mountain was uneventful and I spent a lot of time thinking, as I did during the trip up. I thought about why I chose to undergo the ritual of shugyo and what it would mean to me. I have never thought of myself as someone with “something to prove”, so that was not my motivation. I think it had something to do with just being on my own again, in a manner of speaking. I chose to go when I did for several reasons; the first of which is because it was roughly one year since I first reached the peak. The second reason is because “the idea is to find a memorable occasion that will have emotional significance to those taking part. Then the shugyo serves as a cleansing, a right of passage.” (Morgan, pg. 60) Three weeks before was my wedding day and I can’t think of a more memorable occasion than that.
Perhaps the ritual helped to prepare me for married life, by giving me the confidence I know I’ll need to be a good husband, and someday a good father. Or perhaps the shugyo just served as a chapter marker in my life; the first page of the first chapter of my life together with Brandi. I don’t know. During the trip, I thought about a lot of things and planned on recounting them here, but in retrospect I do not think that was the point of my shugyo. The point was just in the thinking.
I learned about myself that day, spending time alone will do that. I realized that there are some things I like, and others that I don’t. I may not have reached all of my goals during that day, but I think that my understanding about why I am the way I am has improved considerably. And I believe that if I am to understand anyone or anything, I must first understand myself.
References
- Morgan, Forrest E. “Living the Martial Way: A Manual for the Way a Modern Warrior Should Think.” Barricade Books: New York, 1992, pp. 56-61.
- Photos from this day can be found here.
Why Shugyo?
For the samuari, shugyo was a way for warriors to build discipline during a time when their very survival depended on the preparedness for battle. So why would people today need to participate in a ritual that is meant to prepare them for a situation that they are not likely to encounter? Psychiatrist and jujutsu stylist, Dr. Alan Hasegawa, explained it best when he wrote: “In an affluent society, it is necessary to purposely seek out the challenges which were once a part of daily life of the warrior. This drive to test the limits of one’s own potential is universal (1987).”
Mr. Morgan recounts a story of shugyo from his days as a nineteen-year old taekwondo student; the story involved intense training during his first martial arts seminar. “Shugyo doesn’t have to take place in the training hall, and if your spirit is strong, you don’t need someone else to drive you on. If fact, undergoing shugyo along, with no one else to motivate you or look after you safety, can temper your spirit like nothing else can. And there’s no warrior ritual more traditional than solitary shugyo” (Morgan, pg. 60). On the seventh of November, nineteen-hundred, ninety-eight, I engaged in the ritual of solitary shugyo; and this paper is a recount of my actions, thoughts, and feelings while climbing the north of the four peaks, east-northeast of Phoenix, Arizona.
Background
Four Peaks, as the group is called, is a part of the Mazatzal Mountains within Tonto National Forest. The peaks are approximately 80 miles east-northeast of Phoenix and the tallest of which is 7,657 feet above sea level. About 800 feet below the north peak is an area known as “the saddle”. It is approximately one thousand feet above the parking area, which is 18 miles of unpaved road away from Arizona State Highway 87. The image above shows the north peak on the left, and “the saddle” below that to the left.
Preparations
Of course, I had been preparing for this ritual throughout my seven-plus years as a martial artist; but for the hike itself, my preparations began the evening before. Knowing that there would be no honor in getting hurt due to lack of preparation, I took this task very seriously. I went to a local supermarket and purchased several liters of water, some Clif bars, and a Met-Rx bar for sustenance. I did not want to be weighted down by heavy food, either in my stomach or on my back, so the bars were an obvious choice. I also purchased batteries for my camera, knowing that I would want to take pictures along my journey.
After returning home from the store, I placed the water in the refrigerator and searched for other items that would be needed: boots, extra socks, gloves, cellular phone, flashlight, my Leatherman multi-tool, and, of course, the camera. With everything laid out and ready to go, I set my alarm clock for 5:40 and went to bed early; sleep was the one thing I was sure I couldn’t buy at the convenience store by the highway before the Four Peaks Road turnoff.
The following morning my wife made me oatmeal and wheat toast for breakfast while I showered, got dressed, finished packing my bag, and loaded up my cooler with water and Gatorade. By seven in the morning, I was on my way.
Half the Fun
They say that getting there is half the fun and for the most part, I disagree; but in this case, the drive was nice. I had the top off of my 1997 Jeep Wrangler and sixty miles per hour makes for some cold wind in the morning, even in Arizona. I must have been a sight to see along the Superstition Freeway, all bundled up in a sweatshirt and gloves, singing along with “Jesus Christ Superstar”. I actually missed my exit for the Beeline Highway and had to double-back, as it turned out, it wouldn’t be the last time I had to turn around that day…
By nine o’clock or so, I had already filled-up my tank with gasoline and was getting ready to start the eighteen-mile climb up Four Peaks Road. I expected the climb to take about an hour and since the going is slow, it always seems to take longer. The road practically requires four-wheel drive, but I didn’t use mine. The biggest problem one faces on that road are the washes (deep trenches formed by water coming down the mountain) and the rocks, so vehicular clearance is the key. I tend to drive fast and love that kind of driving; an average of eighteen miles per hour on that road is a pretty good clip. I reached the parking lot at the trailhead at around ten o’clock, ready to go… My original plan was to ride my mountain bike up to the saddle and hike the rest of the way, but the parks service bans bikes from the trails, so my plan had to be adjusted. Flexibility is the key here, as in life, plans do not always end up being reality and the ability to adjust is the ability to succeed.
Back in the Saddle
The quest for the summit can be broken down into two distinct parts: from the trailhead to the saddle, and from the saddle to the peak. I’d been to the saddle three times previous and to the peak twice, but this will be the first time on my own. The trail to the saddle is pretty easy and it’s my feeling that anyone in reasonable shape can get to the saddle, the key is to avoid stepping on any critters that you encounter along the way.
I reached the saddle by eleven o’clock and took my first break there. I ate one of the Clif bars and downed some Gatorade, then took the time to take a picture of what lay ahead. The crevasse that starts from just to the right of the top and cuts down into the dark is what was in store for me if I wanted to reach the peak. At this point, I thought I’d spend some more time sitting and drinking Gatorade. I figured that if I could reach the saddle on the way down by two in the afternoon, I would make it off of Four Peaks Road by dark.
Into Thin Air
The toughest part about the climb to the peak is the fact that you can never be one-hundred percent sure that the rock you grab to pull yourself up isn’t going to tumble down the mountain with you. A close second to that is the complete lack of direct sunlight and wind-chill factor that brings the temperature of the already-thin air near freezing. Those factors aside, the climb is nothing more than doing about forty pull-ups and a hundred or so “mountain climbers”, which I learned are appropriately named.
My original intent was to hike to the second peak and I thought I could get there by taking a turn off of the trail to the first peak and hiking a quick “down and up”. As it turned out, I was wrong. I spent about forty minutes struggling through some pretty thick brush and pulling cactus needles out of my hands (and rear) before I reached a drop-off that was too high to take safely, along and without ropes. Since discretion is the better part of valor, I chose turn around go for the north peak; getting injured would defeat the purpose of this ritual and only go to show that I lack the judgement necessary to be an effective leader. This is as close as I got to the second peak, which will have to wait for another day.
On Top of the World
It didn’t take me long to reach the north peak after abandoning my quest for the second peak, perhaps another ten minutes. Once on the north peak, I could see Apache and Roosevelt Lakes to the north, as well as back down to the saddle. I took the time to sit for a while, enjoy another Clif bar and some more Gatorade, and of course, take some pictures. The air on the peak is very clear, but the haze that has settled over the city of Phoenix makes it invisible, almost as if the rest of the world had vanished.
Conclusion
The trip back down the mountain was uneventful and I spent a lot of time thinking, as I did during the trip up. I thought about why I chose to undergo the ritual of shugyo and what it would mean to me. I have never thought of myself as someone with “something to prove”, so that was not my motivation. I think it had something to do with just being on my own again, in a manner of speaking. I chose to go when I did for several reasons; the first of which is because it was roughly one year since I first reached the peak. The second reason is because “the idea is to find a memorable occasion that will have emotional significance to those taking part. Then the shugyo serves as a cleansing, a right of passage.” (Morgan, pg. 60) Three weeks before was my wedding day and I can’t think of a more memorable occasion than that.
Perhaps the ritual helped to prepare me for married life, by giving me the confidence I know I’ll need to be a good husband, and someday a good father. Or perhaps the shugyo just served as a chapter marker in my life; the first page of the first chapter of my life together with Brandi. I don’t know. During the trip, I thought about a lot of things and planned on recounting them here, but in retrospect I do not think that was the point of my shugyo. The point was just in the thinking.
I learned about myself that day, spending time alone will do that. I realized that there are some things I like, and others that I don’t. I may not have reached all of my goals during that day, but I think that my understanding about why I am the way I am has improved considerably. And I believe that if I am to understand anyone or anything, I must first understand myself.
References
- Morgan, Forrest E. “Living the Martial Way: A Manual for the Way a Modern Warrior Should Think.” Barricade Books: New York, 1992, pp. 56-61.
- Photos from this day can be found here.
The Fourth Level of Forms
In my experience there are four levels of understanding forms. The first level is just being able to get through the pattern. The second level is being able to go through the pattern with appropriate speed and timing. The third level is knowing the interpretation of the moves and the meaning of the form. It is at this level that many martial artists stop. Granted, it can take a lifetime to truly understand the subtleties of the self-defense implications within the forms and I’m not suggesting that any martial artist should not continue to pursue this deeper understanding. However, reaching the fourth level of understanding, the ability to effectively teach the form to others, is often a skill that is overlooked in martial arts.
What makes being able to teach a form to others the fourth level of understanding is that it is the culmination of all of the other levels. Indeed, to be able to help a beginner to know the pattern, I’d have to know the pattern myself. To be able to help a beginner to execute the form with appropriate speed and timing, I’d have to be able to demonstrate appropriate speed and timing. Finally, to be able to demonstrate to a beginner the self-defense implications of a form, I would have to first understand them.
However, an important prerequisite for teaching is something that goes beyond what the teacher knows about the form itself. This prerequisite is, of course, effective communication skills. The best martial artist in the world would be a poor teacher if he or she could not communicate effectively. What’s tricky about teaching forms is that “effective” communication is defined solely by what helps the student to understand and this may differ from student to student. In to increase the chances that your methods of instruction will be universally effective, you need to be aware of the three main learning types: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.
Visual learners learn by seeing. In order to cater to visual learners you may have to adjust yourself so that you are always visible to the students. If there is a significant turn in the form, you may have to move to another position so that you are still in view of the students. Kinesthetic learners learn by doing. When teaching kinesthetic learners, it helps to have assistants who can mingle with the students and make minor physical adjustments to their positions. This may mean moving their head block into a more appropriate position or putting your hand in front of them to simulate a target.
Auditory learners learn by hearing. In order to teach auditory learners you must speak slowly and clearly, at the very least; but it is more than that. Many times instructors will go through a form and uses phrases such as “turn this way,” or “do this, then this.” These phrases are as meaningless to an auditory learner as they are to a reader. Instead, use precise names of techniques and directions, either relative or absolute. For example, saying “turn ninety degrees to your left” could mean the same saying “turn and fast the windows;” one is a relative direction, the other is absolute. However, it is generally better to use relative directions since they are more generic. If a student remembers to turn left by ninety degrees then they can do that whether they’re practicing at the dojo or at home.
Since many forms have sections that repeat, it is helpful to use language that makes that obvious. For example, the Okinawan Kenpo Karate form pinan nidan has a repeated section that includes a low cross-block, a break, a kick, and two punches. The first time this combination is done, it is with the right hand on top for the cross block, the right foot does the kick, and the left hand does the first punch. Everything is the opposite for the repeat of the combination. Below are two ways these combinations can be articulated:
Method #1
1. Turn and face this way in a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, right hand on top
3. Break out
4. Right leg kick, set it down in front
5. Right foot forward front stance
6. Left hand punch, right hand punch
7. Turn into a right foot forward front stance
8. Cross block low, left hand on top
9. Break out
10. Left leg kick, set it down in front
11. Left foot forward front stance
12. Right hand punch, left hand punch
Method #2:
1. Turn left 225 degrees into a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, back hand on top
3. Break out
4. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
5. Back hand punch, front hand punch
6. Turn right 90 degrees in the same stance
7. Cross block low, back hand on top
8. Break out
9. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
10. Back hand punch, front hand punch
Both methods accurately describe the techniques, but Method #2 is more effective because it makes the similarities between the two combinations obvious by using the same words. Notice that in Method #2, numbers two through five are the exact same as numbers seven through ten, but that’s not the case for Method #1. The reason this is better for auditory learners is that they don’t have to remember whether it is the right hand then the left hand in the first combination and then the left hand then the right hand in the second combination. They can just remember: back hand punch, front hand punch; and that will be correct for both.
By understanding these simple communication tricks and using them properly an instructor can help students get to the first level of forms, but in the process elevate themselves to the fourth level.
What makes being able to teach a form to others the fourth level of understanding is that it is the culmination of all of the other levels. Indeed, to be able to help a beginner to know the pattern, I’d have to know the pattern myself. To be able to help a beginner to execute the form with appropriate speed and timing, I’d have to be able to demonstrate appropriate speed and timing. Finally, to be able to demonstrate to a beginner the self-defense implications of a form, I would have to first understand them.
However, an important prerequisite for teaching is something that goes beyond what the teacher knows about the form itself. This prerequisite is, of course, effective communication skills. The best martial artist in the world would be a poor teacher if he or she could not communicate effectively. What’s tricky about teaching forms is that “effective” communication is defined solely by what helps the student to understand and this may differ from student to student. In to increase the chances that your methods of instruction will be universally effective, you need to be aware of the three main learning types: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.
Visual learners learn by seeing. In order to cater to visual learners you may have to adjust yourself so that you are always visible to the students. If there is a significant turn in the form, you may have to move to another position so that you are still in view of the students. Kinesthetic learners learn by doing. When teaching kinesthetic learners, it helps to have assistants who can mingle with the students and make minor physical adjustments to their positions. This may mean moving their head block into a more appropriate position or putting your hand in front of them to simulate a target.
Auditory learners learn by hearing. In order to teach auditory learners you must speak slowly and clearly, at the very least; but it is more than that. Many times instructors will go through a form and uses phrases such as “turn this way,” or “do this, then this.” These phrases are as meaningless to an auditory learner as they are to a reader. Instead, use precise names of techniques and directions, either relative or absolute. For example, saying “turn ninety degrees to your left” could mean the same saying “turn and fast the windows;” one is a relative direction, the other is absolute. However, it is generally better to use relative directions since they are more generic. If a student remembers to turn left by ninety degrees then they can do that whether they’re practicing at the dojo or at home.
Since many forms have sections that repeat, it is helpful to use language that makes that obvious. For example, the Okinawan Kenpo Karate form pinan nidan has a repeated section that includes a low cross-block, a break, a kick, and two punches. The first time this combination is done, it is with the right hand on top for the cross block, the right foot does the kick, and the left hand does the first punch. Everything is the opposite for the repeat of the combination. Below are two ways these combinations can be articulated:
Method #1
1. Turn and face this way in a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, right hand on top
3. Break out
4. Right leg kick, set it down in front
5. Right foot forward front stance
6. Left hand punch, right hand punch
7. Turn into a right foot forward front stance
8. Cross block low, left hand on top
9. Break out
10. Left leg kick, set it down in front
11. Left foot forward front stance
12. Right hand punch, left hand punch
Method #2:
1. Turn left 225 degrees into a left foot forward front stance
2. Cross block low, back hand on top
3. Break out
4. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
5. Back hand punch, front hand punch
6. Turn right 90 degrees in the same stance
7. Cross block low, back hand on top
8. Break out
9. Back leg front kick, set it down in front in a front stance
10. Back hand punch, front hand punch
Both methods accurately describe the techniques, but Method #2 is more effective because it makes the similarities between the two combinations obvious by using the same words. Notice that in Method #2, numbers two through five are the exact same as numbers seven through ten, but that’s not the case for Method #1. The reason this is better for auditory learners is that they don’t have to remember whether it is the right hand then the left hand in the first combination and then the left hand then the right hand in the second combination. They can just remember: back hand punch, front hand punch; and that will be correct for both.
By understanding these simple communication tricks and using them properly an instructor can help students get to the first level of forms, but in the process elevate themselves to the fourth level.
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Martial Artists
After I finished reading Steven Covey's The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, I began to consider how these habits would apply specifically to martial arts training. The habits are: be proactive; begin with the end in mind; put first things first; think win-win; seek first to understand, then to be understood; synergize; and sharpen the saw. Since my training has become such an integral part of my life, I was able to see how these habits could be applied to improve my training in a way similar to how they have improved my personal and professional life. Each habit can be interpreted in its own right, but all seven relate to one another in a way that can encompass every aspect of training in the arts.
Be Proactive. This habit is first for very good reason. It basically states that you are responsible for your own training. Your instructor may guide you along the way, but ultimately it is you that must choose the path your training will take. Martial arts training can be like putting a magnifying glass over your personality. It can make good people better, but on the same note can make bad people worse. The true goal of martial arts training should be to evaluate yourself through that magnifying glass and choose the right path.
Begin with the End in Mind. A martial artist who begins with the end in mind is able to see beyond day-to-day training to the greater goal of understanding and self-improvement. Since a martial artist's training, in the broad sense, is never really complete, this can refer to reaching certain goals that are part of that martial artist's training; goals such as earning the next belt level, or black belt, or simply becoming more comfortable executing complicated combinations. Beginning with the end in mind can allow certain aspects of training to be put into perspective. By not having goals that are so far off they seem unreachable, one is able to approach their day-to-day training knowing that they are taking steps towards a realizable goal.
Put First Things First. Every martial artist can probably remember being a beginner and having to do basics over and over, and thinking, "When is this going to end? When do we get to the good stuff?" Well, I've got news for all white belts: The basics are what it's all about. The basics are the first things taught because they are the foundation of all martial arts. Every advanced technique, every combination, and every form can all be broken down to the basics. Because of this, every training session should begin with the basics and build up from there. Consider this: If you are learning a form that contains a lot of a particular stance, strike, or block, what better way to improve the overall form than to simply practice that technique? By improving the basics that make up the forms, the forms themselves will improve as well.
Think Win-Win. This habit can be practiced each and every time you get the chance to work with another martial artist. If there is one thing that I've learned through my own teaching and studying is that one should never assume that they have nothing to learn from someone. Every martial artist is a student and every martial artist is a teacher, regardless of rank. Think of every person you meet as an opportunity to learn, and an opportunity to share what you have learned. This is a true win-win relationship.
Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood. This habit is especially important for instructors. People choose to become students of the martial arts for many different reasons. Since learning flows in both directions it is important for those who are the primary source of the flow to understand what motivates those whom they teach. Students are not simply troughs into which knowledge is dumped like so much water, nor are teachers simply spigots out of which knowledge flows. Teaching and learning are interactive processes and as a martial artist your primary goal should be understanding, both of the art and of the people.
Synergize. Synergy is when the relationship between the parts is a significant part of the whole. More simply, it is when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Synergy can occur for martial artists in many different ways. Synergy can occur during training with a partner because the training can be more significant and effective when two people who are striving for the same goal cooperate in order to reach it together; perhaps more quickly than they could have on their own. This type of synergy can be indicative of a win-win relationship between students. Synergy can also occur between different facets of a martial artist's training. Think of how, by putting first things first, you can improve your forms by improving your basics; or improve your knowledge of self-defense by increasing your knowledge of the interpretation of the forms. Synergy can also occur by training in several styles or cross-training. Think of how much your hand-work could improve by working regularly with a boxer. Think of how much your breathing could improve by incorporating yoga into your training. Why do you think so many three-hundred pound football players take ballet? The only caveat with this sort of training is that some have a tendency to fall into the jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none category. This can be avoided by choosing one style to be your "primary" style and using all of
your other training to augment it.
Sharpen the Saw. This is the habit of constant and continual learning. A martial artist's training is never "complete". If you feel you are at an impasse in your training in a particular style, perhaps it is time to move on; or perhaps it is time to re-evaluate your goals. It is possible that you have reached a plateau and must therefore train with even more vigilance to reach the next level. In any event, it is continual training and the practicing of these habits that lead to the highly effective martial artist.
Be Proactive. This habit is first for very good reason. It basically states that you are responsible for your own training. Your instructor may guide you along the way, but ultimately it is you that must choose the path your training will take. Martial arts training can be like putting a magnifying glass over your personality. It can make good people better, but on the same note can make bad people worse. The true goal of martial arts training should be to evaluate yourself through that magnifying glass and choose the right path.
Begin with the End in Mind. A martial artist who begins with the end in mind is able to see beyond day-to-day training to the greater goal of understanding and self-improvement. Since a martial artist's training, in the broad sense, is never really complete, this can refer to reaching certain goals that are part of that martial artist's training; goals such as earning the next belt level, or black belt, or simply becoming more comfortable executing complicated combinations. Beginning with the end in mind can allow certain aspects of training to be put into perspective. By not having goals that are so far off they seem unreachable, one is able to approach their day-to-day training knowing that they are taking steps towards a realizable goal.
Put First Things First. Every martial artist can probably remember being a beginner and having to do basics over and over, and thinking, "When is this going to end? When do we get to the good stuff?" Well, I've got news for all white belts: The basics are what it's all about. The basics are the first things taught because they are the foundation of all martial arts. Every advanced technique, every combination, and every form can all be broken down to the basics. Because of this, every training session should begin with the basics and build up from there. Consider this: If you are learning a form that contains a lot of a particular stance, strike, or block, what better way to improve the overall form than to simply practice that technique? By improving the basics that make up the forms, the forms themselves will improve as well.
Think Win-Win. This habit can be practiced each and every time you get the chance to work with another martial artist. If there is one thing that I've learned through my own teaching and studying is that one should never assume that they have nothing to learn from someone. Every martial artist is a student and every martial artist is a teacher, regardless of rank. Think of every person you meet as an opportunity to learn, and an opportunity to share what you have learned. This is a true win-win relationship.
Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood. This habit is especially important for instructors. People choose to become students of the martial arts for many different reasons. Since learning flows in both directions it is important for those who are the primary source of the flow to understand what motivates those whom they teach. Students are not simply troughs into which knowledge is dumped like so much water, nor are teachers simply spigots out of which knowledge flows. Teaching and learning are interactive processes and as a martial artist your primary goal should be understanding, both of the art and of the people.
Synergize. Synergy is when the relationship between the parts is a significant part of the whole. More simply, it is when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Synergy can occur for martial artists in many different ways. Synergy can occur during training with a partner because the training can be more significant and effective when two people who are striving for the same goal cooperate in order to reach it together; perhaps more quickly than they could have on their own. This type of synergy can be indicative of a win-win relationship between students. Synergy can also occur between different facets of a martial artist's training. Think of how, by putting first things first, you can improve your forms by improving your basics; or improve your knowledge of self-defense by increasing your knowledge of the interpretation of the forms. Synergy can also occur by training in several styles or cross-training. Think of how much your hand-work could improve by working regularly with a boxer. Think of how much your breathing could improve by incorporating yoga into your training. Why do you think so many three-hundred pound football players take ballet? The only caveat with this sort of training is that some have a tendency to fall into the jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none category. This can be avoided by choosing one style to be your "primary" style and using all of
your other training to augment it.
Sharpen the Saw. This is the habit of constant and continual learning. A martial artist's training is never "complete". If you feel you are at an impasse in your training in a particular style, perhaps it is time to move on; or perhaps it is time to re-evaluate your goals. It is possible that you have reached a plateau and must therefore train with even more vigilance to reach the next level. In any event, it is continual training and the practicing of these habits that lead to the highly effective martial artist.
Monday, November 23, 2009
How I Use Social Networking Sites
Hi!
I recently had a long conversation with Jeff Hodgkinson, project manager extraordinaire, LinkedIn stud, and all-around great guy. We mostly talked about social networking sites and their different usage models. Jeff asked me to write a blog post explaining how I use them, so here it is...
The main social networking sites I use are: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Blogger. I use each in a different way and tie them all together using my web site, which also contains other links. Here's my usage model for each of the main four:
Blogger
My blog is where I publish my writing. My blog posts tend to cover topics about which I've given considerable thought. They're not short posts, and while they may include links to other sites, they're mostly original. I have occasionally included large portions of other people's writing, but that's because that writing had a profound impact on me. I don't post every day, mostly due to time constraints. My blog is accessible to everyone on the Internet.
Twitter
Twitter is where I publish quick updates. My Twitter account is linked to both my LinkedIn and Facebook accounts. This means that my Twitter posts must be appropriate to both my personal and professional "circles," both of which will be defined below. I'll allow anyone to follow me on Twitter.
Facebook
Facebook is where I connect with those with whom I have a personal connection: Family, friends (new, long-time, and long-lost), and classmates (former and current). I have a few co-workers on my Facebook friends list, but no one that I don't consider a friend first and a co-worker second. My goal is not to collect as many friends as possible, so I don't accept friend requests from people I don't know personally. I also use Facebook for news and updates about other things that interest me.
LinkedIn
LinkedIn is where I connect with those with those with whom I have a personal and/or business-related connection. I'll pursue connections with people with whom I've shared one meeting, met briefly at a seminar, or had a interesting conversation with at a party. Like with Facebook, I won't accept a connection from just anyone, but the familiarity bar is lower for LinkedIn. Basically, anyone on my Facebook friends list would be a welcome addition to my LinkedIn connections list, but not necessarily vice versa. Some relationships I'd prefer to keep strictly business. I also use LinkedIn to build my network through groups and my resume through recommendations. I also have an on-line resume at VisualCV.
I understand that others have different models. Jeff, for example, is looking to maximize his LinkedIn network and will accept invitations from anyone. My cousin Timmy is a musician and seems to have a similar policy on Facebook. I also have friends who use Twitter as a way to share more information than I really need to know. There's nothing wrong with any of these models; they're just different than mine. What I'd encourage any social networker to do is to seriously consider what model they want for each site, then ensure the connections and content they share is consistent with that model.
Thanks,
Matt
I recently had a long conversation with Jeff Hodgkinson, project manager extraordinaire, LinkedIn stud, and all-around great guy. We mostly talked about social networking sites and their different usage models. Jeff asked me to write a blog post explaining how I use them, so here it is...
The main social networking sites I use are: Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Blogger. I use each in a different way and tie them all together using my web site, which also contains other links. Here's my usage model for each of the main four:
Blogger
My blog is where I publish my writing. My blog posts tend to cover topics about which I've given considerable thought. They're not short posts, and while they may include links to other sites, they're mostly original. I have occasionally included large portions of other people's writing, but that's because that writing had a profound impact on me. I don't post every day, mostly due to time constraints. My blog is accessible to everyone on the Internet.
Twitter is where I publish quick updates. My Twitter account is linked to both my LinkedIn and Facebook accounts. This means that my Twitter posts must be appropriate to both my personal and professional "circles," both of which will be defined below. I'll allow anyone to follow me on Twitter.
Facebook is where I connect with those with whom I have a personal connection: Family, friends (new, long-time, and long-lost), and classmates (former and current). I have a few co-workers on my Facebook friends list, but no one that I don't consider a friend first and a co-worker second. My goal is not to collect as many friends as possible, so I don't accept friend requests from people I don't know personally. I also use Facebook for news and updates about other things that interest me.
LinkedIn is where I connect with those with those with whom I have a personal and/or business-related connection. I'll pursue connections with people with whom I've shared one meeting, met briefly at a seminar, or had a interesting conversation with at a party. Like with Facebook, I won't accept a connection from just anyone, but the familiarity bar is lower for LinkedIn. Basically, anyone on my Facebook friends list would be a welcome addition to my LinkedIn connections list, but not necessarily vice versa. Some relationships I'd prefer to keep strictly business. I also use LinkedIn to build my network through groups and my resume through recommendations. I also have an on-line resume at VisualCV.
I understand that others have different models. Jeff, for example, is looking to maximize his LinkedIn network and will accept invitations from anyone. My cousin Timmy is a musician and seems to have a similar policy on Facebook. I also have friends who use Twitter as a way to share more information than I really need to know. There's nothing wrong with any of these models; they're just different than mine. What I'd encourage any social networker to do is to seriously consider what model they want for each site, then ensure the connections and content they share is consistent with that model.
Thanks,
Matt
Friday, October 23, 2009
Walter Aircraft Engines
Hi!
Today we visited Walter Aircraft Engines. Walter is a wholly-owned subsidiary (since July 2008) of GE Aviation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric. This plant is also producing under capacity, but it seemed to be a much different feel than Avia. The manager who gave us the tour (blue shirt in the second picture) is from Ohio and previously held a similar post in Romania. Here are some pictures I took during the tour:
This is the metal as it comes into the factory:
This stores cut metal until the workers need it:
Here are some of the metal-working machines:
These are used to clean and plate the parts:
Here is a disassembled engine (sent in for an overhaul) waiting for new parts:
This is where the engines are reassembled:
This is where they're tested (a prop is attached and the doors are opened):
The most interesting aspects of our visit (in my opinion) were the difference between an acquisition by an Indian company (as in Avia's case) and an acquisition by a U.S. company (GE), and the difference between the Czech Republic and Romania.
While GE sent an American manager over, they didn't use a heavy-handed style with their newly acquired Czech employees. The focus was on the customer and seeking ways to reach common goals within the confines of Czech and GE culture. One example is safety. GE insisted that all employees wear safety glasses and offered to pay for prescription glasses for anyone who wanted them. This is standard in the U.S., but was new for the Czechs and they resisted. GE compromised by identifying areas where safety glasses weren't necessary and these are clearly marked.
Both Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and Romania were subject to communist rule post-WWII through the 80's. Czechoslovakia had what is called the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It was called that because things went so smoothly; in fact, no blood was shed as the people were ready, and the government was willing, to end communism. Contrast this with Romania, which had a very violent revolution leading to the public execution of Nicolae Ceauşescu and his wife, Elena. Unfortunately, all the Romanians did was cut off the head of the snake (so to speak), while the rest of the snake remained. By this, I mean that all the government/bureaucratic officials who implemented the communist government were left in place. Our host believes this is why the Czech Republic has progressed so much more quickly than Romania in the last 20 years.
It was an interesting visit and I'm sure Pratt & Whitney (rulers of the market Walter is going after with their new engine) will be taking notice soon.
Thanks,
Matt
Today we visited Walter Aircraft Engines. Walter is a wholly-owned subsidiary (since July 2008) of GE Aviation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of General Electric. This plant is also producing under capacity, but it seemed to be a much different feel than Avia. The manager who gave us the tour (blue shirt in the second picture) is from Ohio and previously held a similar post in Romania. Here are some pictures I took during the tour:
This is the metal as it comes into the factory:
This stores cut metal until the workers need it:
Here are some of the metal-working machines:
These are used to clean and plate the parts:
Here is a disassembled engine (sent in for an overhaul) waiting for new parts:
This is where the engines are reassembled:
This is where they're tested (a prop is attached and the doors are opened):
The most interesting aspects of our visit (in my opinion) were the difference between an acquisition by an Indian company (as in Avia's case) and an acquisition by a U.S. company (GE), and the difference between the Czech Republic and Romania.
While GE sent an American manager over, they didn't use a heavy-handed style with their newly acquired Czech employees. The focus was on the customer and seeking ways to reach common goals within the confines of Czech and GE culture. One example is safety. GE insisted that all employees wear safety glasses and offered to pay for prescription glasses for anyone who wanted them. This is standard in the U.S., but was new for the Czechs and they resisted. GE compromised by identifying areas where safety glasses weren't necessary and these are clearly marked.
Both Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and Romania were subject to communist rule post-WWII through the 80's. Czechoslovakia had what is called the Velvet Revolution in 1989. It was called that because things went so smoothly; in fact, no blood was shed as the people were ready, and the government was willing, to end communism. Contrast this with Romania, which had a very violent revolution leading to the public execution of Nicolae Ceauşescu and his wife, Elena. Unfortunately, all the Romanians did was cut off the head of the snake (so to speak), while the rest of the snake remained. By this, I mean that all the government/bureaucratic officials who implemented the communist government were left in place. Our host believes this is why the Czech Republic has progressed so much more quickly than Romania in the last 20 years.
It was an interesting visit and I'm sure Pratt & Whitney (rulers of the market Walter is going after with their new engine) will be taking notice soon.
Thanks,
Matt
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Avia Ashok Leyland Motors
Hi!
We had our first company visit today: Avia Ashok Leyland Motors. It is a Czech truck maker that was purchased by an Indian company, Ashok Leyland. The plant has a capacity of 20,000 trucks per year, but is currently producing only about 700. Workers are there only three days per week and they are clearly still WAY over capacity. Here are some pictures I took during our tour:
After the tour, we had a chance to speak with a few of the managers, two Czechs and two Indians. The Czechs were the production manager and the human resources manager. The Indians were the procurement manager (local) and a visiting VIP from another site (just got lucky). Here are a few things I learned.
- Czechs like to be managed by Czechs. Before being purchased by Ashok Leyland, Avia was owned by Daewoo. Daewoo sent Koreans to manage all aspects of the company and this was not appreciated.
- Prague does not have a very mobile workforce. In other words, people won't move for a job. The HR director told us that while hiring salesmen, they can really only hire people who already live in Prague.
Here are a few observations that I (and several others in the class) made during the discussion we had later:
- The production manager, who has been with the company for many decades, seems to be nostalgic for communism. He was pretty clear that it was a LOT easier to manage production when they didn't have to worry about planning or sales. They made a certain number of trucks each year that went to the Soviet Union and that was that.
- Avia seems to be dependent on the parent company for any and all strategy. They don't seem to have any kind of strategic goals for themselves. This is a recurring theme as we've heard from others that Czechs (in general) don't seem to think strategically. All the production improvements in the world won't help without a good marketing strategy to increase demand.
It was an interesting visit. It will be interesting to see how AALM does once the financial crisis is over and overall demand picks up.
Thanks,
Matt
We had our first company visit today: Avia Ashok Leyland Motors. It is a Czech truck maker that was purchased by an Indian company, Ashok Leyland. The plant has a capacity of 20,000 trucks per year, but is currently producing only about 700. Workers are there only three days per week and they are clearly still WAY over capacity. Here are some pictures I took during our tour:
After the tour, we had a chance to speak with a few of the managers, two Czechs and two Indians. The Czechs were the production manager and the human resources manager. The Indians were the procurement manager (local) and a visiting VIP from another site (just got lucky). Here are a few things I learned.
- Czechs like to be managed by Czechs. Before being purchased by Ashok Leyland, Avia was owned by Daewoo. Daewoo sent Koreans to manage all aspects of the company and this was not appreciated.
- Prague does not have a very mobile workforce. In other words, people won't move for a job. The HR director told us that while hiring salesmen, they can really only hire people who already live in Prague.
Here are a few observations that I (and several others in the class) made during the discussion we had later:
- The production manager, who has been with the company for many decades, seems to be nostalgic for communism. He was pretty clear that it was a LOT easier to manage production when they didn't have to worry about planning or sales. They made a certain number of trucks each year that went to the Soviet Union and that was that.
- Avia seems to be dependent on the parent company for any and all strategy. They don't seem to have any kind of strategic goals for themselves. This is a recurring theme as we've heard from others that Czechs (in general) don't seem to think strategically. All the production improvements in the world won't help without a good marketing strategy to increase demand.
It was an interesting visit. It will be interesting to see how AALM does once the financial crisis is over and overall demand picks up.
Thanks,
Matt
Monday, October 19, 2009
Reflection
Hi!
I arrived in Prague less than 24 hours ago. During that time I took a walking tour of the city and shot this photo of a modern building right across the street from a much older (and more typical in Prague) building:
Detractors complained that the building is ugly. Its architect encouraged people not to look at the glass, but rather in its reflection. In this, one sees the beauty of what is around it.
The same is true of people. No matter what we look like on the outside, we are still beautiful if we reflect beauty. The difference is that we choose what we reflect. What's in your reflection?
Thanks,
Matt
I arrived in Prague less than 24 hours ago. During that time I took a walking tour of the city and shot this photo of a modern building right across the street from a much older (and more typical in Prague) building:
Detractors complained that the building is ugly. Its architect encouraged people not to look at the glass, but rather in its reflection. In this, one sees the beauty of what is around it.
The same is true of people. No matter what we look like on the outside, we are still beautiful if we reflect beauty. The difference is that we choose what we reflect. What's in your reflection?
Thanks,
Matt
Sunday, September 27, 2009
My Chili Recipe
Hi!
It's starting to cool down a bit, so I've started making chili. I titled this post "My Chili Recipe" but it's really more of a philosophy. I'll list ingredients and amounts (assuming 24 cups), but it's really the approach that I think works for me. Let's start with the base. Here's what's in it:
- Four medium-sized tomatoes
- Two large Anaheim green chili peppers
- One large white onion
- Thirty ounces of tomato sauce
- Two teaspoons of ground cumin
- Three tablespoons of chili powder
- One-and-a-half teaspoons of pepper
- One teaspoon of celery salt
- One teaspoon of salt
- Two cups of water
This isn't very spicy. Ever since I discovered Dave's Gourmet, I know I can make any dish as hot as I want without having to worry about special peppers or powders. I can always add heat later one bowl at a time. What makes my approach different is that I put all that stuff in the blender so that my chili doesn't have chunks of vegetables leading to huge variations in the taste of each bite. For this batch size, I'll split everything into two blenders-full of ingredients and use the water to rinse the blender afterward so that none of the good stuff is left sticking to the side...
The base is put into a crock pot (slow cooker) at least eight hours before serving. I cook it for a long time on low to ensure that the beans are soft and everything else in the pot takes on the flavor of the base. What else goes into my chili depends on what strikes my fancy. I've added all of the following at one time or another:
- Kidney beans
- Garbanzo beans
- Northern beans
- White beans
- Black beans
- Corn
- Carnitas
- Ground turkey
- Ground beef
- Macaroni
- Rice
Basically, any kind of beans or meat would be fine. My rule of thumb is that if I'm adding meat (~1 lb), pasta, or rice, then I use four fifteen ounce cans of beans/corn. If not, I use six. I dump the cans of beans/corn one at a time into a strainer and rinse them off, removing casings and anything else that wouldn't look good on a spoon. I brown the ground meat, but don't fully cook it as if I were making tacos. When I use carnitas, it's usually purchased already spiced in packages (from TJ's) that are normally used in burritos. The rice is usually boil-in-a-bag or microwaveable. Rice and pasta shouldn't be added right away. In fact, the pasta (uncooked) shouldn't be added until ~20 before serving. A cup of either is plenty.
While it's cooking, I stir regularly, but not often. At first, it looks like there will be a LOT of liquid, but much of it will cook off...more will be absorbed by the pasta during its cooking. Even on low, the chili will be VERY hot, so I usually turn the heat off as I add the pasta. Stirring the pasta in and recovering it will ensure that it stays pretty hot and still cooks the pasta.
I've found over the years that I've experimented more and tried different kinds of meats and beans. It's fun and we usually end up with enough to last a few days. Serve with corn chips, soup crackers, or corn bread (The TJ's brand box is REALLY good.) and enjoy!
Take care!
Matt
It's starting to cool down a bit, so I've started making chili. I titled this post "My Chili Recipe" but it's really more of a philosophy. I'll list ingredients and amounts (assuming 24 cups), but it's really the approach that I think works for me. Let's start with the base. Here's what's in it:
- Four medium-sized tomatoes
- Two large Anaheim green chili peppers
- One large white onion
- Thirty ounces of tomato sauce
- Two teaspoons of ground cumin
- Three tablespoons of chili powder
- One-and-a-half teaspoons of pepper
- One teaspoon of celery salt
- One teaspoon of salt
- Two cups of water
This isn't very spicy. Ever since I discovered Dave's Gourmet, I know I can make any dish as hot as I want without having to worry about special peppers or powders. I can always add heat later one bowl at a time. What makes my approach different is that I put all that stuff in the blender so that my chili doesn't have chunks of vegetables leading to huge variations in the taste of each bite. For this batch size, I'll split everything into two blenders-full of ingredients and use the water to rinse the blender afterward so that none of the good stuff is left sticking to the side...
The base is put into a crock pot (slow cooker) at least eight hours before serving. I cook it for a long time on low to ensure that the beans are soft and everything else in the pot takes on the flavor of the base. What else goes into my chili depends on what strikes my fancy. I've added all of the following at one time or another:
- Kidney beans
- Garbanzo beans
- Northern beans
- White beans
- Black beans
- Corn
- Carnitas
- Ground turkey
- Ground beef
- Macaroni
- Rice
Basically, any kind of beans or meat would be fine. My rule of thumb is that if I'm adding meat (~1 lb), pasta, or rice, then I use four fifteen ounce cans of beans/corn. If not, I use six. I dump the cans of beans/corn one at a time into a strainer and rinse them off, removing casings and anything else that wouldn't look good on a spoon. I brown the ground meat, but don't fully cook it as if I were making tacos. When I use carnitas, it's usually purchased already spiced in packages (from TJ's) that are normally used in burritos. The rice is usually boil-in-a-bag or microwaveable. Rice and pasta shouldn't be added right away. In fact, the pasta (uncooked) shouldn't be added until ~20 before serving. A cup of either is plenty.
While it's cooking, I stir regularly, but not often. At first, it looks like there will be a LOT of liquid, but much of it will cook off...more will be absorbed by the pasta during its cooking. Even on low, the chili will be VERY hot, so I usually turn the heat off as I add the pasta. Stirring the pasta in and recovering it will ensure that it stays pretty hot and still cooks the pasta.
I've found over the years that I've experimented more and tried different kinds of meats and beans. It's fun and we usually end up with enough to last a few days. Serve with corn chips, soup crackers, or corn bread (The TJ's brand box is REALLY good.) and enjoy!
Take care!
Matt
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
George Washington's Rules of Civility
I found this on the NPR web site and wanted to share it:
As a young schoolboy in Virginia, George Washington took his first steps toward greatness by copying out by hand a list of 110 'Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation.' Based on a 16th-century set of precepts compiled for young gentlemen by Jesuit instructors, the Rules of Civility were one of the earliest and most powerful forces to shape America's first president, says historian Richard Brookhiser.
Most of the rules are concerned with details of etiquette, offering pointers on such issues as how to dress, walk, eat in public and address one's superiors. But in the introduction to the newly published Rules of Civility: The 110 Precepts That Guided Our First President in War and Peace, Brookhiser warns against dismissing the maxims as "mere" etiquette. "The rules address moral issues, but they address them indirectly," Brookhiser writes. "They seek to form the inner man (or boy) by shaping the outer."
Brookhiser says the advice the rules offer, though often outlandish in detail, is still applicable in our day and age: "Maybe they can work on us in our century as the Jesuits intended them to work in theirs — indirectly — by putting us in a more ambitious frame of mind."
The Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation
(For ease of reading, punctuation and spelling have been modernized.)
1. Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.
2. When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered.
3. Show nothing to your friend that may affright him.
4. In the presence of others, sing not to yourself with a humming voice, or drum with your fingers or feet.
5. If you cough, sneeze, sigh or yawn, do it not loud but privately, and speak not in your yawning, but put your handkerchief or hand before your face and turn aside.
6. Sleep not when others speak, sit not when others stand, speak not when you should hold your peace, walk not on when others stop.
7. Put not off your clothes in the presence of others, nor go out of your chamber half dressed.
8. At play and attire, it's good manners to give place to the last comer, and affect not to speak louder than ordinary.
9. Spit not into the fire, nor stoop low before it; neither put your hands into the flames to warm them, nor set your feet upon the fire, especially if there be meat before it.
10. When you sit down, keep your feet firm and even, without putting one on the other or crossing them.
11. Shift not yourself in the sight of others, nor gnaw your nails.
12. Shake not the head, feet, or legs; roll not the eyes; lift not one eyebrow higher than the other, wry not the mouth, and bedew no man's face with your spittle by approaching too near him when you speak.
13. Kill no vermin, or fleas, lice, ticks, etc. in the sight of others; if you see any filth or thick spittle put your foot dexterously upon it; if it be upon the clothes of your companions, put it off privately, and if it be upon your own clothes, return thanks to him who puts it off.
14. Turn not your back to others, especially in speaking; jog not the table or desk on which another reads or writes; lean not upon anyone.
15. Keep your nails clean and short, also your hands and teeth clean, yet without showing any great concern for them.
16. Do not puff up the cheeks, loll not out the tongue with the hands or beard, thrust out the lips or bite them, or keep the lips too open or too close.
17. Be no flatterer, neither play with any that delight not to be played withal.
18. Read no letter, books, or papers in company, but when there is a necessity for the doing of it, you must ask leave; come not near the books or writtings of another so as to read them unless desired, or give your opinion of them unasked. Also look not nigh when another is writing a letter.
19. Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave.
20. The gestures of the body must be suited to the discourse you are upon.
21. Reproach none for the infirmities of nature, nor delight to put them that have in mind of thereof.
22. Show not yourself glad at the misfortune of another though he were your enemy.
23. When you see a crime punished, you may be inwardly pleased; but always show pity to the suffering offender.
24. Do not laugh too loud or too much at any public spectacle.
25. Superfluous compliments and all affectation of ceremonies are to be avoided, yet where due they are not to be neglected.
26. In putting off your hat to persons of distinction, as noblemen, justices, churchmen, etc., make a reverence, bowing more or less according to the custom of the better bred, and quality of the persons. Among your equals expect not always that they should begin with you first, but to pull off the hat when there is no need is affectation. In the manner of saluting and resaluting in words, keep to the most usual custom.
27. 'Tis ill manners to bid one more eminent than yourself be covered, as well as not to do it to whom it is due. Likewise he that makes too much haste to put on his hat does not well, yet he ought to put it on at the first, or at most the second time of being asked. Now what is herein spoken, of qualification in behavior in saluting, ought also to be observed in taking of place and sitting down, for ceremonies without bounds are troublesome.
28. If any one come to speak to you while you are are sitting stand up, though he be your inferior, and when you present seats, let it be to everyone according to his degree.
29. When you meet with one of greater quality than yourself, stop and retire, especially if it be at a door or any straight place, to give way for him to pass.
30. In walking, the highest place in most countries seems to be on the right hand; therefore, place yourself on the left of him whom you desire to honor. But if three walk together the middest place is the most honorable; the wall is usally given to the most worthy if two walk together.
31. If anyone far surpasses others, either in age, estate, or merit, yet would give place to a meaner than himself in his own lodging or elsewhere, the one ought not to except it. So he on the other part should not use much earnestness nor offer it above once or twice.
32. To one that is your equal, or not much inferior, you are to give the chief place in your lodging, and he to whom it is offered ought at the first to refuse it, but at the second to accept though not without acknowledging his own unworthiness.
33. They that are in dignity or in office have in all places precedency, but whilst they are young, they ought to respect those that are their equals in birth or other qualities, though they have no public charge.
34. It is good manners to prefer them to whom we speak before ourselves, especially if they be above us, with whom in no sort we ought to begin.
35. Let your discourse with men of business be short and comprehensive.
36. Artificers and persons of low degree ought not to use many ceremonies to lords or others of high degree, but respect and highly honor then, and those of high degree ought to treat them with affability and courtesy, without arrogance.
37. In speaking to men of quality do not lean nor look them full in the face, nor approach too near them at left. Keep a full pace from them.
38. In visiting the sick, do not presently play the physician if you be not knowing therein.
39. In writing or speaking, give to every person his due title according to his degree and the custom of the place.
40. Strive not with your superior in argument, but always submit your judgment to others with modesty.
41. Undertake not to teach your equal in the art himself professes; it savors of arrogancy.
42. Let your ceremonies in courtesy be proper to the dignity of his place with whom you converse, for it is absurd to act the same with a clown and a prince.
43. Do not express joy before one sick in pain, for that contrary passion will aggravate his misery.
44. When a man does all he can, though it succeed not well, blame not him that did it.
45. Being to advise or reprehend any one, consider whether it ought to be in public or in private, and presently or at some other time; in what terms to do it; and in reproving show no signs of cholor but do it with all sweetness and mildness.
46. Take all admonitions thankfully in what time or place soever given, but afterwards not being culpable take a time and place convenient to let him know it that gave them.
47. Mock not nor jest at any thing of importance. Break no jests that are sharp, biting, and if you deliver any thing witty and pleasant, abstain from laughing thereat yourself.
48. Wherein you reprove another be unblameable yourself, for example is more prevalent than precepts.
49. Use no reproachful language against any one; neither curse nor revile.
50. Be not hasty to believe flying reports to the disparagement of any.
51. Wear not your clothes foul, or ripped, or dusty, but see they be brushed once every day at least and take heed that you approach not to any uncleaness.
52. In your apparel be modest and endeavor to accommodate nature, rather than to procure admiration; keep to the fashion of your equals, such as are civil and orderly with respect to time and places.
53. Run not in the streets, neither go too slowly, nor with mouth open; go not shaking of arms, nor upon the toes, kick not the earth with your feet, go not upon the toes, nor in a dancing fashion.
54. Play not the peacock, looking every where about you, to see if you be well decked, if your shoes fit well, if your stockings sit neatly and clothes handsomely.
55. Eat not in the streets, nor in the house, out of season.
56. Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone than in bad company.
57. In walking up and down in a house, only with one in company if he be greater than yourself, at the first give him the right hand and stop not till he does and be not the first that turns, and when you do turn let it be with your face towards him; if he be a man of great quality walk not with him cheek by jowl but somewhat behind him, but yet in such a manner that he may easily speak to you.
58. Let your conversation be without malice or envy, for 'tis a sign of a tractable and commendable nature, and in all causes of passion permit reason to govern.
59. Never express anything unbecoming, nor act against the rules moral before your inferiors.
60. Be not immodest in urging your friends to discover a secret.
61. Utter not base and frivolous things among grave and learned men, nor very difficult questions or subjects among the ignorant, or things hard to be believed; stuff not your discourse with sentences among your betters nor equals.
62. Speak not of doleful things in a time of mirth or at the table; speak not of melancholy things as death and wounds, and if others mention them, change if you can the discourse. Tell not your dreams, but to your intimate friend.
63. A man ought not to value himself of his achievements or rare qualities of wit; much less of his riches, virtue or kindred.
64. Break not a jest where none take pleasure in mirth; laugh not aloud, nor at all without occasion; deride no man's misfortune though there seem to be some cause.
65. Speak not injurious words neither in jest nor earnest; scoff at none although they give occasion.
66. Be not froward but friendly and courteous, the first to salute, hear and answer; and be not pensive when it's a time to converse.
67. Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.
68. Go not thither, where you know not whether you shall be welcome or not; give not advice without being asked, and when desired do it briefly.
69. If two contend together take not the part of either unconstrained, and be not obstinate in your own opinion. In things indifferent be of the major side.
70. Reprehend not the imperfections of others, for that belongs to parents, masters and superiors.
71. Gaze not on the marks or blemishes of others and ask not how they came. What you may speak in secret to your friend, deliver not before others.
72. Speak not in an unknown tongue in company but in your own language and that as those of quality do and not as the vulgar. Sublime matters treat seriously.
73. Think before you speak, pronounce not imperfectly, nor bring out your words too hastily, but orderly and distinctly.
74. When another speaks, be attentive yourself and disturb not the audience. If any hesitate in his words, help him not nor prompt him without desired. Interrupt him not, nor answer him till his speech be ended.
75. In the midst of discourse ask not of what one treats, but if you perceive any stop because of your coming, you may well entreat him gently to proceed. If a person of quality comes in while you're conversing, it's handsome to repeat what was said before.
76. While you are talking, point not with your finger at him of whom you discourse, nor approach too near him to whom you talk, especially to his face.
77. Treat with men at fit times about business and whisper not in the company of others.
78. Make no comparisons and if any of the company be commended for any brave act of virtue, commend not another for the same.
79. Be not apt to relate news if you know not the truth thereof. In discoursing of things you have heard, name not your author. Always a secret discover not.
80. Be not tedious in discourse or in reading unless you find the company pleased therewith.
81. Be not curious to know the affairs of others, neither approach those that speak in private.
82. Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.
83. When you deliver a matter do it without passion and with discretion, however mean the person be you do it to.
84. When your superiors talk to anybody hearken not, neither speak nor laugh.
85. In company of those of higher quality than yourself, speak not 'til you are asked a question, then stand upright, put off your hat and answer in few words.
86. In disputes, be not so desirous to overcome as not to give liberty to each one to deliver his opinion and submit to the judgment of the major part, especially if they are judges of the dispute.
87. Let your carriage be such as becomes a man grave, settled and attentive to that which is spoken. Contradict not at every turn what others say.
88. Be not tedious in discourse, make not many digressions, nor repeat often the same manner of discourse.
89. Speak not evil of the absent, for it is unjust.
90. Being set at meat scratch not, neither spit, cough or blow your nose except there's a necessity for it.
91. Make no show of taking great delight in your victuals. Feed not with greediness. Eat your bread with a knife. Lean not on the table, neither find fault with what you eat.
92. Take no salt or cut bread with your knife greasy.
93. Entertaining anyone at table it is decent to present him with meat. Undertake not to help others undesired by the master.
94. If you soak bread in the sauce, let it be no more than what you put in your mouth at a time, and blow not your broth at table but stay 'til it cools of itself.
95. Put not your meat to your mouth with your knife in your hand; neither spit forth the stones of any fruit pie upon a dish nor cast anything under the table.
96. It's unbecoming to heap much to one's mea. Keep your fingers clean and when foul wipe them on a corner of your table napkin.
97. Put not another bite into your mouth 'til the former be swallowed. Let not your morsels be too big for the jowls.
98. Drink not nor talk with your mouth full; neither gaze about you while you are drinking.
99. Drink not too leisurely nor yet too hastily. Before and after drinking wipe your lips. Breathe not then or ever with too great a noise, for it is uncivil.
100. Cleanse not your teeth with the tablecloth, napkin, fork or knife, but if others do it, let it be done with a pick tooth.
101. Rinse not your mouth in the presence of others.
102. It is out of use to call upon the company often to eat. Nor need you drink to others every time you drink.
103. In company of your betters be not longer in eating than they are. Lay not your arm but only your hand upon the table.
104. It belongs to the chiefest in company to unfold his napkin and fall to meat first. But he ought then to begin in time and to dispatch with dexterity that the slowest may have time allowed him.
105. Be not angry at table whatever happens and if you have reason to be so, show it not but on a cheerful countenance especially if there be strangers, for good humor makes one dish of meat a feast.
106. Set not yourself at the upper of the table but if it be your due, or that the master of the house will have it so. Contend not, lest you should trouble the company.
107. If others talk at table be attentive, but talk not with meat in your mouth.
108. When you speak of God or His attributes, let it be seriously and with reverence. Honor and obey your natural parents although they be poor.
109. Let your recreations be manful not sinful.
110. Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.
As a young schoolboy in Virginia, George Washington took his first steps toward greatness by copying out by hand a list of 110 'Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation.' Based on a 16th-century set of precepts compiled for young gentlemen by Jesuit instructors, the Rules of Civility were one of the earliest and most powerful forces to shape America's first president, says historian Richard Brookhiser.
Most of the rules are concerned with details of etiquette, offering pointers on such issues as how to dress, walk, eat in public and address one's superiors. But in the introduction to the newly published Rules of Civility: The 110 Precepts That Guided Our First President in War and Peace, Brookhiser warns against dismissing the maxims as "mere" etiquette. "The rules address moral issues, but they address them indirectly," Brookhiser writes. "They seek to form the inner man (or boy) by shaping the outer."
Brookhiser says the advice the rules offer, though often outlandish in detail, is still applicable in our day and age: "Maybe they can work on us in our century as the Jesuits intended them to work in theirs — indirectly — by putting us in a more ambitious frame of mind."
The Rules of Civility & Decent Behavior in Company and Conversation
(For ease of reading, punctuation and spelling have been modernized.)
1. Every action done in company ought to be with some sign of respect to those that are present.
2. When in company, put not your hands to any part of the body not usually discovered.
3. Show nothing to your friend that may affright him.
4. In the presence of others, sing not to yourself with a humming voice, or drum with your fingers or feet.
5. If you cough, sneeze, sigh or yawn, do it not loud but privately, and speak not in your yawning, but put your handkerchief or hand before your face and turn aside.
6. Sleep not when others speak, sit not when others stand, speak not when you should hold your peace, walk not on when others stop.
7. Put not off your clothes in the presence of others, nor go out of your chamber half dressed.
8. At play and attire, it's good manners to give place to the last comer, and affect not to speak louder than ordinary.
9. Spit not into the fire, nor stoop low before it; neither put your hands into the flames to warm them, nor set your feet upon the fire, especially if there be meat before it.
10. When you sit down, keep your feet firm and even, without putting one on the other or crossing them.
11. Shift not yourself in the sight of others, nor gnaw your nails.
12. Shake not the head, feet, or legs; roll not the eyes; lift not one eyebrow higher than the other, wry not the mouth, and bedew no man's face with your spittle by approaching too near him when you speak.
13. Kill no vermin, or fleas, lice, ticks, etc. in the sight of others; if you see any filth or thick spittle put your foot dexterously upon it; if it be upon the clothes of your companions, put it off privately, and if it be upon your own clothes, return thanks to him who puts it off.
14. Turn not your back to others, especially in speaking; jog not the table or desk on which another reads or writes; lean not upon anyone.
15. Keep your nails clean and short, also your hands and teeth clean, yet without showing any great concern for them.
16. Do not puff up the cheeks, loll not out the tongue with the hands or beard, thrust out the lips or bite them, or keep the lips too open or too close.
17. Be no flatterer, neither play with any that delight not to be played withal.
18. Read no letter, books, or papers in company, but when there is a necessity for the doing of it, you must ask leave; come not near the books or writtings of another so as to read them unless desired, or give your opinion of them unasked. Also look not nigh when another is writing a letter.
19. Let your countenance be pleasant but in serious matters somewhat grave.
20. The gestures of the body must be suited to the discourse you are upon.
21. Reproach none for the infirmities of nature, nor delight to put them that have in mind of thereof.
22. Show not yourself glad at the misfortune of another though he were your enemy.
23. When you see a crime punished, you may be inwardly pleased; but always show pity to the suffering offender.
24. Do not laugh too loud or too much at any public spectacle.
25. Superfluous compliments and all affectation of ceremonies are to be avoided, yet where due they are not to be neglected.
26. In putting off your hat to persons of distinction, as noblemen, justices, churchmen, etc., make a reverence, bowing more or less according to the custom of the better bred, and quality of the persons. Among your equals expect not always that they should begin with you first, but to pull off the hat when there is no need is affectation. In the manner of saluting and resaluting in words, keep to the most usual custom.
27. 'Tis ill manners to bid one more eminent than yourself be covered, as well as not to do it to whom it is due. Likewise he that makes too much haste to put on his hat does not well, yet he ought to put it on at the first, or at most the second time of being asked. Now what is herein spoken, of qualification in behavior in saluting, ought also to be observed in taking of place and sitting down, for ceremonies without bounds are troublesome.
28. If any one come to speak to you while you are are sitting stand up, though he be your inferior, and when you present seats, let it be to everyone according to his degree.
29. When you meet with one of greater quality than yourself, stop and retire, especially if it be at a door or any straight place, to give way for him to pass.
30. In walking, the highest place in most countries seems to be on the right hand; therefore, place yourself on the left of him whom you desire to honor. But if three walk together the middest place is the most honorable; the wall is usally given to the most worthy if two walk together.
31. If anyone far surpasses others, either in age, estate, or merit, yet would give place to a meaner than himself in his own lodging or elsewhere, the one ought not to except it. So he on the other part should not use much earnestness nor offer it above once or twice.
32. To one that is your equal, or not much inferior, you are to give the chief place in your lodging, and he to whom it is offered ought at the first to refuse it, but at the second to accept though not without acknowledging his own unworthiness.
33. They that are in dignity or in office have in all places precedency, but whilst they are young, they ought to respect those that are their equals in birth or other qualities, though they have no public charge.
34. It is good manners to prefer them to whom we speak before ourselves, especially if they be above us, with whom in no sort we ought to begin.
35. Let your discourse with men of business be short and comprehensive.
36. Artificers and persons of low degree ought not to use many ceremonies to lords or others of high degree, but respect and highly honor then, and those of high degree ought to treat them with affability and courtesy, without arrogance.
37. In speaking to men of quality do not lean nor look them full in the face, nor approach too near them at left. Keep a full pace from them.
38. In visiting the sick, do not presently play the physician if you be not knowing therein.
39. In writing or speaking, give to every person his due title according to his degree and the custom of the place.
40. Strive not with your superior in argument, but always submit your judgment to others with modesty.
41. Undertake not to teach your equal in the art himself professes; it savors of arrogancy.
42. Let your ceremonies in courtesy be proper to the dignity of his place with whom you converse, for it is absurd to act the same with a clown and a prince.
43. Do not express joy before one sick in pain, for that contrary passion will aggravate his misery.
44. When a man does all he can, though it succeed not well, blame not him that did it.
45. Being to advise or reprehend any one, consider whether it ought to be in public or in private, and presently or at some other time; in what terms to do it; and in reproving show no signs of cholor but do it with all sweetness and mildness.
46. Take all admonitions thankfully in what time or place soever given, but afterwards not being culpable take a time and place convenient to let him know it that gave them.
47. Mock not nor jest at any thing of importance. Break no jests that are sharp, biting, and if you deliver any thing witty and pleasant, abstain from laughing thereat yourself.
48. Wherein you reprove another be unblameable yourself, for example is more prevalent than precepts.
49. Use no reproachful language against any one; neither curse nor revile.
50. Be not hasty to believe flying reports to the disparagement of any.
51. Wear not your clothes foul, or ripped, or dusty, but see they be brushed once every day at least and take heed that you approach not to any uncleaness.
52. In your apparel be modest and endeavor to accommodate nature, rather than to procure admiration; keep to the fashion of your equals, such as are civil and orderly with respect to time and places.
53. Run not in the streets, neither go too slowly, nor with mouth open; go not shaking of arms, nor upon the toes, kick not the earth with your feet, go not upon the toes, nor in a dancing fashion.
54. Play not the peacock, looking every where about you, to see if you be well decked, if your shoes fit well, if your stockings sit neatly and clothes handsomely.
55. Eat not in the streets, nor in the house, out of season.
56. Associate yourself with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for 'tis better to be alone than in bad company.
57. In walking up and down in a house, only with one in company if he be greater than yourself, at the first give him the right hand and stop not till he does and be not the first that turns, and when you do turn let it be with your face towards him; if he be a man of great quality walk not with him cheek by jowl but somewhat behind him, but yet in such a manner that he may easily speak to you.
58. Let your conversation be without malice or envy, for 'tis a sign of a tractable and commendable nature, and in all causes of passion permit reason to govern.
59. Never express anything unbecoming, nor act against the rules moral before your inferiors.
60. Be not immodest in urging your friends to discover a secret.
61. Utter not base and frivolous things among grave and learned men, nor very difficult questions or subjects among the ignorant, or things hard to be believed; stuff not your discourse with sentences among your betters nor equals.
62. Speak not of doleful things in a time of mirth or at the table; speak not of melancholy things as death and wounds, and if others mention them, change if you can the discourse. Tell not your dreams, but to your intimate friend.
63. A man ought not to value himself of his achievements or rare qualities of wit; much less of his riches, virtue or kindred.
64. Break not a jest where none take pleasure in mirth; laugh not aloud, nor at all without occasion; deride no man's misfortune though there seem to be some cause.
65. Speak not injurious words neither in jest nor earnest; scoff at none although they give occasion.
66. Be not froward but friendly and courteous, the first to salute, hear and answer; and be not pensive when it's a time to converse.
67. Detract not from others, neither be excessive in commanding.
68. Go not thither, where you know not whether you shall be welcome or not; give not advice without being asked, and when desired do it briefly.
69. If two contend together take not the part of either unconstrained, and be not obstinate in your own opinion. In things indifferent be of the major side.
70. Reprehend not the imperfections of others, for that belongs to parents, masters and superiors.
71. Gaze not on the marks or blemishes of others and ask not how they came. What you may speak in secret to your friend, deliver not before others.
72. Speak not in an unknown tongue in company but in your own language and that as those of quality do and not as the vulgar. Sublime matters treat seriously.
73. Think before you speak, pronounce not imperfectly, nor bring out your words too hastily, but orderly and distinctly.
74. When another speaks, be attentive yourself and disturb not the audience. If any hesitate in his words, help him not nor prompt him without desired. Interrupt him not, nor answer him till his speech be ended.
75. In the midst of discourse ask not of what one treats, but if you perceive any stop because of your coming, you may well entreat him gently to proceed. If a person of quality comes in while you're conversing, it's handsome to repeat what was said before.
76. While you are talking, point not with your finger at him of whom you discourse, nor approach too near him to whom you talk, especially to his face.
77. Treat with men at fit times about business and whisper not in the company of others.
78. Make no comparisons and if any of the company be commended for any brave act of virtue, commend not another for the same.
79. Be not apt to relate news if you know not the truth thereof. In discoursing of things you have heard, name not your author. Always a secret discover not.
80. Be not tedious in discourse or in reading unless you find the company pleased therewith.
81. Be not curious to know the affairs of others, neither approach those that speak in private.
82. Undertake not what you cannot perform but be careful to keep your promise.
83. When you deliver a matter do it without passion and with discretion, however mean the person be you do it to.
84. When your superiors talk to anybody hearken not, neither speak nor laugh.
85. In company of those of higher quality than yourself, speak not 'til you are asked a question, then stand upright, put off your hat and answer in few words.
86. In disputes, be not so desirous to overcome as not to give liberty to each one to deliver his opinion and submit to the judgment of the major part, especially if they are judges of the dispute.
87. Let your carriage be such as becomes a man grave, settled and attentive to that which is spoken. Contradict not at every turn what others say.
88. Be not tedious in discourse, make not many digressions, nor repeat often the same manner of discourse.
89. Speak not evil of the absent, for it is unjust.
90. Being set at meat scratch not, neither spit, cough or blow your nose except there's a necessity for it.
91. Make no show of taking great delight in your victuals. Feed not with greediness. Eat your bread with a knife. Lean not on the table, neither find fault with what you eat.
92. Take no salt or cut bread with your knife greasy.
93. Entertaining anyone at table it is decent to present him with meat. Undertake not to help others undesired by the master.
94. If you soak bread in the sauce, let it be no more than what you put in your mouth at a time, and blow not your broth at table but stay 'til it cools of itself.
95. Put not your meat to your mouth with your knife in your hand; neither spit forth the stones of any fruit pie upon a dish nor cast anything under the table.
96. It's unbecoming to heap much to one's mea. Keep your fingers clean and when foul wipe them on a corner of your table napkin.
97. Put not another bite into your mouth 'til the former be swallowed. Let not your morsels be too big for the jowls.
98. Drink not nor talk with your mouth full; neither gaze about you while you are drinking.
99. Drink not too leisurely nor yet too hastily. Before and after drinking wipe your lips. Breathe not then or ever with too great a noise, for it is uncivil.
100. Cleanse not your teeth with the tablecloth, napkin, fork or knife, but if others do it, let it be done with a pick tooth.
101. Rinse not your mouth in the presence of others.
102. It is out of use to call upon the company often to eat. Nor need you drink to others every time you drink.
103. In company of your betters be not longer in eating than they are. Lay not your arm but only your hand upon the table.
104. It belongs to the chiefest in company to unfold his napkin and fall to meat first. But he ought then to begin in time and to dispatch with dexterity that the slowest may have time allowed him.
105. Be not angry at table whatever happens and if you have reason to be so, show it not but on a cheerful countenance especially if there be strangers, for good humor makes one dish of meat a feast.
106. Set not yourself at the upper of the table but if it be your due, or that the master of the house will have it so. Contend not, lest you should trouble the company.
107. If others talk at table be attentive, but talk not with meat in your mouth.
108. When you speak of God or His attributes, let it be seriously and with reverence. Honor and obey your natural parents although they be poor.
109. Let your recreations be manful not sinful.
110. Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire called conscience.
Lemon Chicken
Hi!
I cooked three pounds of chicken last night and as it's one of our family favorites, I thought I'd share the recipe. This is an Italian-style (as opposed to Chinese) lemon chicken made with white wine and capers. Here are the ingredients:
- 3lbs of chicken, trimmed of fat and cut into chunks (~4 to a breast)
- 2 sticks of unsalted butter (not margarine or some other fake crap)
- 1 cup of lemon juice, preferably fresh-squeezed (it makes a difference)
- 1 cup of white wine; use one you like, single-serving bottles are enough
- 1 3.5oz jar of non-pareil capers, drained; use more if you like
- Enough olive oil; use the best you can find, Canola is never the answer!
- A coating mix that is half-flour and half-garlic powder
Heat the pan to medium-high, between six and seven out of ten on my range. Pre-heat the oven to ~200 degrees. (This will make sense later.) Put some olive oil in the pan; how much depends on the stickiness of the pan and your penchant for olive oil. Coat a piece chicken in the flour/garlic mix and drop it in the pan. Repeat until the pan is full, but not so full that you can move the chicken around with a shake of the pan. After a few minutes, flip the chicken over. When the chicken is done, transfer it to something you can keep in the oven. This will keep the cooked chicken warm while you finish the rest...
After the chicken is all cooked and in the oven, pour the lemon juice into the pan. Don't clean the pan first! If there are stuck bits of chicken, let them be a part of the sauce... Let the juice simmer for a few minutes. Pour in the wine and stir for a bit. Let it all simmer for a few minutes. Cut the butter into patty-sized chunks and melt it into the pan. Don't let it just sit there; stir constantly so that the butter, lemon juice, and wine are mixed together very well. After the butter is melted and the mixture is smooth, pour in the capers. Stir for a bit, then pour the sauce over the chicken.
The whole chicken/sauce mixture can stay in the oven while you prepare the rest of the meal. We usually have this with pasta, but it's good with rice and by itself. If you choose pasta, pick one with a lot of surface area so that the sauce will stick to it. Keep in mind that three pounds is enough to feed six to ten people. If you want to cook less chicken, don't cut the sauce recipe by the same proportion. The least amount of sauce I'd recommend is half of what's given above, even if you only cook one-quarter the amount of chicken...
Enjoy!
Matt
I cooked three pounds of chicken last night and as it's one of our family favorites, I thought I'd share the recipe. This is an Italian-style (as opposed to Chinese) lemon chicken made with white wine and capers. Here are the ingredients:
- 3lbs of chicken, trimmed of fat and cut into chunks (~4 to a breast)
- 2 sticks of unsalted butter (not margarine or some other fake crap)
- 1 cup of lemon juice, preferably fresh-squeezed (it makes a difference)
- 1 cup of white wine; use one you like, single-serving bottles are enough
- 1 3.5oz jar of non-pareil capers, drained; use more if you like
- Enough olive oil; use the best you can find, Canola is never the answer!
- A coating mix that is half-flour and half-garlic powder
Heat the pan to medium-high, between six and seven out of ten on my range. Pre-heat the oven to ~200 degrees. (This will make sense later.) Put some olive oil in the pan; how much depends on the stickiness of the pan and your penchant for olive oil. Coat a piece chicken in the flour/garlic mix and drop it in the pan. Repeat until the pan is full, but not so full that you can move the chicken around with a shake of the pan. After a few minutes, flip the chicken over. When the chicken is done, transfer it to something you can keep in the oven. This will keep the cooked chicken warm while you finish the rest...
After the chicken is all cooked and in the oven, pour the lemon juice into the pan. Don't clean the pan first! If there are stuck bits of chicken, let them be a part of the sauce... Let the juice simmer for a few minutes. Pour in the wine and stir for a bit. Let it all simmer for a few minutes. Cut the butter into patty-sized chunks and melt it into the pan. Don't let it just sit there; stir constantly so that the butter, lemon juice, and wine are mixed together very well. After the butter is melted and the mixture is smooth, pour in the capers. Stir for a bit, then pour the sauce over the chicken.
The whole chicken/sauce mixture can stay in the oven while you prepare the rest of the meal. We usually have this with pasta, but it's good with rice and by itself. If you choose pasta, pick one with a lot of surface area so that the sauce will stick to it. Keep in mind that three pounds is enough to feed six to ten people. If you want to cook less chicken, don't cut the sauce recipe by the same proportion. The least amount of sauce I'd recommend is half of what's given above, even if you only cook one-quarter the amount of chicken...
Enjoy!
Matt
Monday, September 21, 2009
Coffee: Organic Mexican Zaragoza Select
Hi!
Brandi and I were out of coffee and I was going to Whole Foods anyway, so I thought we'd try something new. I was in the mood for a light roast, and the Organic Mexican Zaragoza Select caught my eye:
.jpg)
The barista behind the counter said, "Going for the good stuff, huh?" I replied, "We'll see..." since I'd never had it before and the last time I had Mexican coffee (in Mexico), I decided that Jacqueline could use the rest of the beans for potions...
.jpg)
She said that ALL the baristas drink that blend and she HAS to have some every morning. I figure that's high praise. A barista at Whole Foods is probably as much of a coffee snob as I am, so I put about eight tablespoons of beans (two four-cup pots) in a bag. Before I could leave the counter, though, she insisted that I try it and brewed me a sample. It was worth the extra couple of minutes.
When I got it home and showed Brandi the photos, she said "Uh, Mexican..." probably remembering the same incident from our trip. I told her what the barista said, so she agreed to give it a try. It IS very good. We had the first pot last night and I'm brewing the second pot now. Highly recommended...
Thanks,
Matt
Brandi and I were out of coffee and I was going to Whole Foods anyway, so I thought we'd try something new. I was in the mood for a light roast, and the Organic Mexican Zaragoza Select caught my eye:
.jpg)
The barista behind the counter said, "Going for the good stuff, huh?" I replied, "We'll see..." since I'd never had it before and the last time I had Mexican coffee (in Mexico), I decided that Jacqueline could use the rest of the beans for potions...
.jpg)
She said that ALL the baristas drink that blend and she HAS to have some every morning. I figure that's high praise. A barista at Whole Foods is probably as much of a coffee snob as I am, so I put about eight tablespoons of beans (two four-cup pots) in a bag. Before I could leave the counter, though, she insisted that I try it and brewed me a sample. It was worth the extra couple of minutes.
When I got it home and showed Brandi the photos, she said "Uh, Mexican..." probably remembering the same incident from our trip. I told her what the barista said, so she agreed to give it a try. It IS very good. We had the first pot last night and I'm brewing the second pot now. Highly recommended...
Thanks,
Matt
Saturday, September 19, 2009
NurtureShock: New Thinking About Children
Hi!
I found this post titled "How to Raise Your Kids—and Maybe Your Company, Too" through Guy Kawasaki's blog. I was more interested in the kids part of it. Here's a Q&A with authors of "NurtureShock," Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman:
A couple of comments... First, I don't think any of this is particularly new. Alfie Kohn wrote "Punished By Rewards" 16 years ago. In it, he cites numerous studies that suggest rewarding kids for "good" behavior doesn't reinforce the behavior, it reinforces the desire to get rewarded.
I also don't think "be truthful" is much of a revelation. Who wouldn't recommend that? What's interesting is that there is an assumption that going to school is the right thing and the goal seems to try and minimize the damage. This is just another reason that I'm glad we're unschooling. Someday, I hope to live in a world where those sending their kids off to schools are the ones who have to justify themselves...
Thanks,
Matt
I found this post titled "How to Raise Your Kids—and Maybe Your Company, Too" through Guy Kawasaki's blog. I was more interested in the kids part of it. Here's a Q&A with authors of "NurtureShock," Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman:
1. Question: Are children “little adults”? Do their minds work like an adult’s?
Answer: Of course, if you ask a parent if his child’s brain works the same as his, he’ll say, “No.” However, in practice, it’s surprising how often we expect kids to respond to things in the same way that adults do; we use ourselves as the frame of reference.
A good example of that is how adults use praise. Adults expect praise and financial rewards for their good work—bonuses are motivating. So people assume praise or prizes—even money—motivate kids, but there is no evidence that’s true. If anything, the opposite seems more true. Kids increasingly seek activities that bring immediate, tangible benefits, and doing something just for the joy of it fades away.
2. Question: If they aren’t “little adults,” should we do the opposite of what adult-logic would suggest?
Answer: It’s enough to stop assuming that kids share our perspectives and start asking kids what they understand. Even young kids can be quite articulate about how they see the world, and hearing their answers can lead to some fascinating insight. Almost all 5-year-old kids know that lying is “bad,” but then scientists asked them why lying was bad. The kids replied that lying was bad because it got them punished. It had little to do with the value of honesty.
3. Question: What should one do if he/she sees friends or relatives praising their kid’s intelligence?
Answer: I’d suggest that they focus their praise on what the kid is doing—that is, “You worked really hard on that, didn’t you?” My very-short-hand cocktail party explanation for the research on praise is that praising intelligence teaches kids that success is based on an innate skill either they have or they don’t. What we want to teach kids is that their fate is in their hands—that they can change outcomes, depending on how much they work at things.
4. Question: What’s more dangerous: over-nurturing or under-nurturing kids?
Answer: I’d take the overly attentive parent over the parent who ignored a kid any day. And more enriched environments and interactions are great for kids. There’s some research indicating that more attentive parenting for one kid may change parent-child interactions for generations.
I think over-involved parenting is a real issue only when it prevents kids from being able to make mistakes and work things out on their own. Sure, we can offer advice if they are stuck, but making mistakes is how kids learn problem-solving. I mean, every CEO I’ve interviewed has told me the same thing: it’s in the missteps, not the successes, that you learn the most.
5. Question: On a scale of 1-10, where 1 is strict and 10 is lenient, where should parents be?
Answer: A three, maybe? But the issue isn’t simply about strictness versus leniency: it’s also about warmth. Scholars always look at discipline and warmth of a parent-child relationship at the same time. If the parent-child relationship is generally warm, caring, and supportive, that dramatically improves the effectiveness of discipline. Nancy Darling, a researcher at Oberlin, is the one who really clarified the discipline issue for me. She said that it’s easy to make rules, but it’s hard to enforce them. So the better approach is to set just a few rules on things that a parent believes are truly important, and when those are violated, be consistent in the response (i.e., punishment). However, even for those rules, once in a while, if the kid has a legitimate reason why you should bend a rule, it doesn’t damage your authority to agree. It actually increases your authority because your kid knows that you can be reasonable and fair.
6. Question: How should one teach kids about race?
Answer: There’s a fear, particularly among white parents, that talking about race teaches kids to be racist. But the reality is that parents’ silence leaves kids with a vacuum of knowledge to fill on their own. The other trap is that a lot of us fall into saying things like, “Everybody’s equal.” That’s just too vague for young children to understand: they don’t even know that is a comment about race. The better course is to talk about race in the same way we talk about gender. We have no problem saying, “Girls and boys can both be good at sports.” That’s how we should talk about it.
7. Question: How can you tell if a school is operating according to the findings of your book?
Answer: I hope schools will address how they assess children for gifted programs, so that they become less focused on early testing. I also hope that schools will look past ethnic demographics and determine if kids are having meaningful cross-race interactions outside the classroom.
Schools that require kids to get on buses at 7 am or earlier trouble me. Dr. Mark Mahowald threw down a gauntlet when he told me that school schedules are for adults’ convenience, not for kids’ learning. No one has even tried to refute his argument. School start times need to move back.
8. Question: What’s a parent to do if he/she is basically raising their kids in the wrong way according to your book?
Answer: Both Po and I think that most people do the best they can for their kids, so NurtureShock isn’t about laying blame. We aren’t saying there is a “right” or “wrong” way to raise a child. NurtureShock is intended to catalyze a new way of thinking about learning and growth. I’d rather people read the book with an orientation towards the future, rather than worry about past mistakes.
I do hope that parents and other caregivers consider kids’ actions in light of the science. If the science seems to have an explanation that illuminates their kids’ behavior, then it would make sense to follow the scientists’ recommendations—or look for more information out there. I know there were a lot of things that once I’d read the science, I had to change.
Also, I’d never say that the research applies in every circumstance with every kid. Kids are much more complicated than that. If the science just doesn’t seem to be consistent with that kid’s development, maybe it’ll be more relevant later. The scientists themselves are enormously respectful of parents’ individual experiences.
9. Question: What does it mean if a kid is a skillful liar?
Answer: It depends on the child’s age. Between 3 and 4, almost all kids begin experimenting with some lying. So, at a very young age, the ability to lie actually signals cognitive advancement because lying requires kids to know one reality while trying to convince someone of something else entirely. They have to keep those two competing ideas going on in their heads at the same time. The important thing is how we respond to those initial lies—making sure that kids understand we value honesty. That it makes grown-ups happy to hear the truth, even if the truth means admitting some wrongdoing.
For kids older than 7, lying—skillful or otherwise—is more of a concern. At that point, kids can start to believe that lying is the best way to handle uncomfortable social situations. Once that strategy is in place, lying becomes much more difficult to stop.
10. Question: After writing the book, what child-raising practices have you or Po changed?
Answer: Every chapter changed how we did things. One quick example: I was really struck by an idea that one scholar, Debbie Leong, pointed out: good students know when they are doing well and when they’re having trouble. Kids who struggle are genuinely unsure of how they are doing. The key is to help them develop this self-awareness. So I used to look at a kid’s essay, marking up the mistakes so that he could fix them. Now I point to the paper and say, “Somewhere in this line is a mistake. What is it?” Nine times out of ten, they find it without my help. And if they’ve repeated the error, they often spot it on their own later on. They really become aware of how important it is to pay attention to their work.
11. Question: Your book cites study after study—what if they have their own bias, flaws, etc., such that the studies are no more “true” than what parents are doing now?
Answer: Scientific methodology has transformed over the past ten years. The scholars can now statistically analyze findings to see if they hold true across race, gender, age, and other factors. But beyond that, the best scholars are extremely critical of their own work. They’re the first to point out what their studies do and don’t accomplish; they seem as eager to tell you what went wrong with a study as what went right. And rather than bristle under hard questioning, they usually welcome the input.
As for what’s in NurtureShock, when psychologists, neuro-imaging scientists, demographers, sociologists, and others all independently come to the same conclusions, there’s real strength in the findings. That’s the kind of scientific consensus we wanted to see before we included research in the book. And if a study seemed rife with bias-issues or methodological concerns, we didn’t include it in the book.
Also, we included a lot of specifics on the scientists’ experiments. We did so because we didn’t want people to just take our word on the research; we wanted readers to have enough information that they could make up their own minds about the findings. The value of understanding the scientists’ process isn’t limited to a specific result. It’s more about learning what questions we need to ask scientists now and in the future.
12. Question: Knowing all that you know, what is the one summary piece of advice you want to give to parents?
Answer: Be truthful with kids. While it isn’t necessary to be brutally honest, before I praise a kid, I ask myself if I really believe what I’m saying. If I do, then I think it’s probably right to say. It’s better for a kid to hear parents argue and resolve the quarrel, then it is to pretend the argument never occurred because the kids usually already know about the dispute. It’s the result they’re unsure of. A lot of communication by adults is intended to manipulate kids, and they’re usually on to us. And when we are constantly trying to outsmart kids, it may work in the moment, but ultimately it can hurt our credibility. Then kids don’t believe that they can turn to us when they need some honest advice. If we expect kids to be truthful with us, we should be truthful with them.
A couple of comments... First, I don't think any of this is particularly new. Alfie Kohn wrote "Punished By Rewards" 16 years ago. In it, he cites numerous studies that suggest rewarding kids for "good" behavior doesn't reinforce the behavior, it reinforces the desire to get rewarded.
I also don't think "be truthful" is much of a revelation. Who wouldn't recommend that? What's interesting is that there is an assumption that going to school is the right thing and the goal seems to try and minimize the damage. This is just another reason that I'm glad we're unschooling. Someday, I hope to live in a world where those sending their kids off to schools are the ones who have to justify themselves...
Thanks,
Matt
Thursday, September 17, 2009
New Year's Resolutions
Hi!
It's been over a month, but a lot has happened since my last update. This time it's emphasis on "new." I won't change what I wrote in January, but I will change how I'm thinking about it...
1) Get back into martial arts as a family activity. After listening to Jeff Sabo speak at the Good Vibrations Unschooling Conference last weekend, I realized that this wasn't about my family. It was about me. I was trying to to get my family to follow my passions. I'm willing to support them no matter where their passions lead, even if they lead away from what I love to do... One of the true joys of parenting is to see your child fully engaged in something they love to do. It can be quite perplexing when it's something you don't understand or enjoy, but it's still wonderful...
2) Successfully complete my courses at Thunderbird. When I wrote this in January, I was defining "success" as earning an A. I didn't explicitly state this, but that's what was on my mind. I earned a B+ in Global Financial Management. It was my first non-A in a non-science, non-engineering course post-high school (undergrad and two+ graduate degrees). At first, I as pretty bummed. Now, I think it's liberating. I'm taking three courses now and it's a LOT of work. (Thunderbird moved a 1.5-credit course that was supposed to be in the second half of the term to the first half because of the instructor's availability.) Having already blown my "perfect" GPA, I can focus on learning and balance...
3) Establish better communication with friends and family. Communication is a two-way street. I'll claim that I'm doing well because I'm writing a blog, posting on Facebook, and maintaining a web site...but until I work to understand better what my friends and family have to say then I'm not really doing a good job. It has to be more than just reading the blogs and status updates of others... I'm working on it...
4) Establish and maintain good exercise and financial habits. I've been sick and stressed, which is a bad combination for maintaining health. I've also made two trips to California in the last month, which is hard on our finances. Fortunately, I'm in pretty good overall health and YNAB has helped us plan ahead so we're not getting deeper in debt to pay for these trips. We still have work to do, but we're on the right track. As for exercise habits, a good friend and personal trainer, James Godin, has helped me create an exercise routine that will fit my schedule and goals. Now, I just need to get started...
Well, that's my update for now. I feel like I took a step backwards, but only because I have a different perspective. That's okay. I think that new year's resolutions are meant to do that from time to time. We'll see how the last three months of 2009 go and start again in 2010...
Take care!
Matt
It's been over a month, but a lot has happened since my last update. This time it's emphasis on "new." I won't change what I wrote in January, but I will change how I'm thinking about it...
1) Get back into martial arts as a family activity. After listening to Jeff Sabo speak at the Good Vibrations Unschooling Conference last weekend, I realized that this wasn't about my family. It was about me. I was trying to to get my family to follow my passions. I'm willing to support them no matter where their passions lead, even if they lead away from what I love to do... One of the true joys of parenting is to see your child fully engaged in something they love to do. It can be quite perplexing when it's something you don't understand or enjoy, but it's still wonderful...
2) Successfully complete my courses at Thunderbird. When I wrote this in January, I was defining "success" as earning an A. I didn't explicitly state this, but that's what was on my mind. I earned a B+ in Global Financial Management. It was my first non-A in a non-science, non-engineering course post-high school (undergrad and two+ graduate degrees). At first, I as pretty bummed. Now, I think it's liberating. I'm taking three courses now and it's a LOT of work. (Thunderbird moved a 1.5-credit course that was supposed to be in the second half of the term to the first half because of the instructor's availability.) Having already blown my "perfect" GPA, I can focus on learning and balance...
3) Establish better communication with friends and family. Communication is a two-way street. I'll claim that I'm doing well because I'm writing a blog, posting on Facebook, and maintaining a web site...but until I work to understand better what my friends and family have to say then I'm not really doing a good job. It has to be more than just reading the blogs and status updates of others... I'm working on it...
4) Establish and maintain good exercise and financial habits. I've been sick and stressed, which is a bad combination for maintaining health. I've also made two trips to California in the last month, which is hard on our finances. Fortunately, I'm in pretty good overall health and YNAB has helped us plan ahead so we're not getting deeper in debt to pay for these trips. We still have work to do, but we're on the right track. As for exercise habits, a good friend and personal trainer, James Godin, has helped me create an exercise routine that will fit my schedule and goals. Now, I just need to get started...
Well, that's my update for now. I feel like I took a step backwards, but only because I have a different perspective. That's okay. I think that new year's resolutions are meant to do that from time to time. We'll see how the last three months of 2009 go and start again in 2010...
Take care!
Matt
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Shihan Larry Isaac Promotion to 10th Degree
Local karate schools help instructor attain 10th degree black belt !
Two schools in the Tempe/Ahwatukee and QueenCreek areas participated together by the direction of Renshi Robyn Rush-James, 5th degree Black Belt, (from Maricopa, AZ) in fundraising for a surprise promotion for thier Head Instructor of thier Okinawan Weapons martial arts division Shihan Larry Isaac from Jacksonville, North Carolina. JB Martial Arts owned by Glen Wong and S&H Martial Arts owned by Mike Stevens were the key players to making this happen. Shihan Larry Isaac attended the Universal Martial Arts Association 2009 Hall of Fame Banquet in Washington DC., September 5th, to receive a Founders Award for contributions to the martial arts. The two schools together sponsored the fees related for this rank promotion. With the assistance of Shihan Frank Williams, Hall of fame promoter who brought Grandmaster/Hanshi Seifuku Nitta in from Okinawa and presented him with a surprise award of this 10th degree Black Belt (Highest attainable rank). The greatest honor was when Mr. Frank Williams Phd announced these two school names during this presentation and event. Renshi Rush-James will be hosting Shihan Isaac to the local area either later this fall or early spring to hold martial arts seminars at these two schools.
Copy of Press Release: Sept 6th, 2009
Photo provided/taken by Polly Melick
Sunday, September 06, 2009
The Public Option
Hi!
As the debate over universal health care rages, it amazes me to hear people who so vehemently oppose the public option for health care are often the same folks who are happy to send their kids to public school. Since kids spend a LOT more time in school then they do at the doctor, and there is a LOT more variability in the quality of schools than the quality of doctors, it seems VERY hypocritical.
Full disclosure: My kids are homeschooled. However, my wife and I consider this a choice that we're glad we have the option to make. We considered the public option, and chose another. We believe that public schools SHOULD be available to everyone and don't mind paying taxes to support schools that don't benefit our kids, because they do benefit society. Of course, I'd understand opposition to the public health care option if schools are any indication of what we'd expect. If public health care were run like public schools...
1) Kids would see a doctor in groups of 30 and the sickest kid would define the treatment all 30 would receive. The following year, kids would be grouped differently and see a different set of doctors.
2) In order to improve health, the government would (with the help of for-profit hospitals who administer the tests) define what "healthy" means based on what some very simple tests can measure.
3) Kids who are not healthy are labeld "special" and encouraged to drop out of the system by administrators and doctors who are paid based on the "health scores" their kids receive.
Any others? Clearly, this would be an insane way to run a health care system for our kids, but it is almost EXACTLY how our public school system is run. Fortunately, no one (I repeat, NO ONE) is suggesting this kind of system for universal health care. Rather than fight what is a perfectly reasonable (though, admittedly, not perfect) universal health care proposal, why not oppose what is clearly a public school system that is disfunctional?
Take care!
Matt
As the debate over universal health care rages, it amazes me to hear people who so vehemently oppose the public option for health care are often the same folks who are happy to send their kids to public school. Since kids spend a LOT more time in school then they do at the doctor, and there is a LOT more variability in the quality of schools than the quality of doctors, it seems VERY hypocritical.
Full disclosure: My kids are homeschooled. However, my wife and I consider this a choice that we're glad we have the option to make. We considered the public option, and chose another. We believe that public schools SHOULD be available to everyone and don't mind paying taxes to support schools that don't benefit our kids, because they do benefit society. Of course, I'd understand opposition to the public health care option if schools are any indication of what we'd expect. If public health care were run like public schools...
1) Kids would see a doctor in groups of 30 and the sickest kid would define the treatment all 30 would receive. The following year, kids would be grouped differently and see a different set of doctors.
2) In order to improve health, the government would (with the help of for-profit hospitals who administer the tests) define what "healthy" means based on what some very simple tests can measure.
3) Kids who are not healthy are labeld "special" and encouraged to drop out of the system by administrators and doctors who are paid based on the "health scores" their kids receive.
Any others? Clearly, this would be an insane way to run a health care system for our kids, but it is almost EXACTLY how our public school system is run. Fortunately, no one (I repeat, NO ONE) is suggesting this kind of system for universal health care. Rather than fight what is a perfectly reasonable (though, admittedly, not perfect) universal health care proposal, why not oppose what is clearly a public school system that is disfunctional?
Take care!
Matt
Friday, September 04, 2009
Top 10 Ideas for Restarting an IP Program
Hi!
I recently read an article titled "Top 10 Ideas for Restarting an IP Program" by Bill Meade at www.openforum.com. Since I'm currently taking Global Enterprise at Thunderbird and one of the aspects of the course is Corporate Entrepreneurship, I found it very interesting... Here's an extended excerpt describing what companies should do to restart their IP (Intellectual Property, or patent generation) program.
Thanks!
Matt
I recently read an article titled "Top 10 Ideas for Restarting an IP Program" by Bill Meade at www.openforum.com. Since I'm currently taking Global Enterprise at Thunderbird and one of the aspects of the course is Corporate Entrepreneurship, I found it very interesting... Here's an extended excerpt describing what companies should do to restart their IP (Intellectual Property, or patent generation) program.
1. Isolate your patent business model. The big question here is how will patents pay for themselves? By protecting markets from competitors? By being licensed? By reducing the rate of patent litigation? The best place to start an IP program is with a solid foundation on profitability. Then, once you’ve decided what the IP business model is, measure it. Gilb’s Law of Quantification is that there is always a way to measure that is better to not measuring at all. Supertrue for the area of IP. Measure and ye shall receive.
2. Tell inventors the “what.” If you write down the seven areas where you want inventions, and make these areas into a cover sheet on your invention disclosure, you will increase the rate of strategic inventing. Increase from whatever it is now, to over 90%. Until inventors get calibrated, filling out invention disclosure forms is an uncertain, risky, stab in the dark. Tell inventors what you need, and you drain the uncertainty, risk, and much of the career threat from sharing ideas.
3. Tell inventors the “why.” If you can proactively communicate the criteria by which invention disclosures are evaluated, you will increase your rate and quality of inventing dramatically. I think the best way to do this is to pick four scales that range from 1 (low) to 10 (high), have a legal person rate each disclosure on these scales, and have a technical person do the same. You’ll learn a lot as the two raters talk about the differences in their scores and begin to converge. Information is contained in contrasts such as these:
* Scale 1: Bringing in new business
* Scale 2: Required investment
* Scale 3: Competitive pain caused
* Scale 4: Current business protected
This process forces your legal and business people to operationalize their currently implicit theories—for example, “Above 30 is a default file patent decision”. Then you can objectively communicate these scores with inventors to calibrate them to the company’s standards. Numerical clarity simultaneously increases the rate and quality of inventing. Quality comes up rapidly, so rapidly that the IP department budgets become immediately overtaxed with potential patent ideas that attorneys canʼt bear not to file on.
4. Make a contract between IP and Senior Management. The biggest sin of omission in starting an IP program is not having an activity-based budget contract between management and the legal department. It can seem like an approach of “Break it. We’ll fix it as we go” is a good enough start—especially before you have shown that you can improve either quality or quantity of IP.
It’s not true.
Break-fix does not work for legal departments. Legal is not a BUSINESS function. Legal is a dignified profession. When corporate lawyers need more money, they won’t demand it. Every legal department I’ve worked with has been a wall flower about money—denial ain’t just a River in Egypt. Lawyers won’t pound the table (like psychotic marketing VPs) and demand funding. So without a contract you are likely to end up killing your IP program with success as the legal department chokes on increased activity and improved quality.
If you have a contract between the IP people and Senior Management, the IP people wonʼt drown in the great disclosures theyʼve always wished to see. And management, for the first time, will have to specify (cap) the appropriate activity level for IP in the company.
5. Establish a translation layer. I have a Ph.D. in marketing with minors in electrical engineering, evolutionary ecology, econometrics, and statistics. When I arrived at HP I was a in marketing, managing printer products. Very soon I was beamed across the group into managing the business side of a million dollar a month burn rate, patent litigation event between HP and Xerox. My background in BOTH hard science and soft science sides was the reason for this assignment. Hard science plus soft science training prepared me to be able to translate between all the stakeholder groups in intellectual property.
Being able to translate between engineer and marketeer, engineer and attorney, between attorney and VP of Technology, and between outside counsel and inside counsel, and most importantly for that litigation event, between the PR people, business people, and patent attorneys, we were able to shut down the HP/Xerox litigation at minimum cost. The IP management game is won by simplifying and accelerating communication. Hire a translation layer person, someone who delights at being stuck in the middle of people who can’t, don’t, or won’t communicate.
6. Build the rebel alliance. Unrecognized in every great technical company is an incipient alliance of people who want to help intellectual property management happen. IP rebel alliance members are sometimes are visible as patent coordinators in business groups, but the vast majority of potential rebel alliance members are below the waterline like an iceberg. By tapping the rebel alliance, I was able to keep IP strategies moving while remaining flat to the wall—not leaving a cost profile that a computer or finance person could see.
For example, I built a world wide automatic payment system for IP payments. But, by tapping the rebel alliance, I built this system without head count, budget, or even an accounting code. No company knows what it should be spending on IP. So the less you have to spend, the more successful you can be. The way to spend less on IP than anyone for a given level of success is to build the rebel alliance.
7. Democratize inventing. If you haven not engineered an ‘inventing democracy,’ you don’t have it. Being content with inventions that find you, means you have biased and filtered access to the ideas created in your organization. A lot of things make inventing undemocratic: habit, cultural assumptions, ignorance, and inertia. My personal favorite ‘wrong’ cultural assumption is that engineers in engineering groups CAN be inventors while engineers in sales groups CAN NOT be inventors - even if the engineer came from an engineering group and used to be an inventor.
You need to build business processes between the legal department and the inventors. Between the legal department and the business people. And probably between legal, finance, business, and inventors if you have invention incentive program. Democratization of invention is engineered in over time as you feel your way iteratively discovering breakthrough processes. If you design in open-ness, you’ll maximize the quality and income of your IP system.
8. Be enthusiastic. The root words of “enthusiasm” are “en” which means “in” and “theos” which means god. Enthusiasm is the god within. And enthusiasm is responsible for all the results I’ve achieved in IP management. This was surprising to my boss; he was a twenty-five year managing counsel for IP who once said, “The policies have been on the books for seven years. The doors of the legal department have always been open. Why is everything happening now? … I’m surprised at how much more happens when enthusiasm is behind the process pushing.”
Enthusiasm is not taught in law school. So, enthusiasm is crucial complementary skill to your legal department. Make sure whoever you hire is famous for enthusiasm. For example, while I was running an invention workshop for the first time at a client. During the presentation the IP attorney (now GC for IP) present looked at me and blurted out “This is like an intellectual property revival meeting!” Yes, exactly!!!
9. Strip your disclosure. Invention disclosures are complex forms created by patent attorneys to pass muster with other patent attorneys. The requirements to document an invention are however, very few. Why complex forms for simple inventions? Because attorneys are shifting the work they are supposed to do, on to inventors. If you want more and better disclosures from the inventors, simplify. Take the legal department’s work, off the backs of your inventors. If the legal department needs more people to process invention disclosures, so be it.
Starting up an intellectual property program is about profit, not cost. Groundrule #1 is that nobody in the system gets to optimize their own costs at the expense of other people in the system. Simplify the disclosure, put a targeting cover sheet on it, you’ll be delighted with how the results come in good and then continue to get better every month.
10. Close the open loops. Intellectual property is managed open loop. Invention incentives if companies have policies, are always a disaster as far as inventors are concerned. Companies are either months (or years) behind in payments, or the payments come so far after invention (4 years if the patent has to issue before the inventor receives payment) that the “incentives” are useless for making inventors feel like they are part of a team. Basic strategies like how IP pays for itself, are not written, reviewed, measured, or routinely revised.
But donʼt feel bad about IP being open loop. This is what an ground floor opportunity looks like!! Intellectual property infrastructure and culture are built up over-time. Reigniting an IP program is a lot of fun because reigniting IP programs helps companies protect and re-monetize themselves, gets employees working together in new ways, and makes jobs more meaningful for people when they see that their work is valuable, patentable, and part of the company’s competitive advantage going forward.
Thanks!
Matt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)