Friday, March 20, 2009

An Alternative to Competition: The Demo Team

Hi!

I've written several posts related to the case against competition, most of which are excerpts from my article in Taekwondo Times magazine. They've covered the concept of kiai, martial arts forms, the purpose of stances, and point sparring. This post will cover the positive aspects of martial arts tournaments and how these can still be achieved without the use of competition.

Martial arts tournaments can be a showcase for students to perform in front of large, unfamiliar audiences. Getting over nervousness and having the self-confidence necessary to do this is one of the main benefits of martial arts training. However, a tournament is not the only (or even the best) way to do this. A demonstration not only achieves the same thing, but if done as part of a multi-school event will also encourage students (and instructors) to share knowledge and learn from one another. Tournament competition not only doesn't encourage this, but it would not be in a competitor's best interests to share knowledge if they believe it would hurt their chances of winning. If everyone's goal is to learn and put on a great show, then everyone will have an incentive to share.

A demo team is also a great way for a school to create camaraderie among its students (and perhaps generate some additional revenue for the school). Demo team members don't (and shouldn't) have to be the highest-ranking, most-talented martial artists in the school. By showcasing lower ranks and people with obvious physical limitations (I, for one, am severely gravitationally challenged.), the school will project an "anyone can do this" attitude. Having a diverse demo team will also allow people to see the transformations possible through martial arts.

Removing the competitive undercurrents from training will not only help the students see people as enablers of their success, but will also help the school become a stronger family. Most schools will claim this is their goal, but if a school owner pushes competition, then he may be kicking himself in the foot...

Thanks,
Matt

No comments: